• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigation in to the bending Of material in the form of A beam.

Extracts from this document...


Investigation in to the bending Of material in the form of A beam In this experiment we wanted to investigate how far a beam would bend when weights were attached to the end. We put a 1m ruler on the end of a desk and then added weights to the end of the ruler; the weights went from 100g to 800g. The height of the ruler off the ground was 82cm. There are many variables you can change for this investigation, such as: The length of the ruler, the length of the ruler off the desk, the height above ground and the mass on the ruler. We changed the mass put on the ruler. Prediction My prediction for this experiment is that the more weight added to the ruler, the more the ruler would bend. ...read more.


3.05 4 70 82 78.1 78 78.05 3.95 5 70 82 77.2 77 77.1 4.9 6 70 82 76.3 76 76.15 5.85 7 70 82 75.3 75.3 75.3 6.7 8 70 82 74.4 74.4 74.4 7.6 We then put all these results in to a graph and drew the line of best fit. Fair Test To make this experiment a fair test, we have to: * Keep the ruler at the same length after each weight has been placed on. * Keep the ruler at the same height so it does not change the bendiness of the ruler. * Add 1 weight at a time * Always measure the bend of the ruler at a certain time after the ruler has stopped bouncing, so you do not get a wrong measurement. ...read more.


This can also mean that1 weight can be � to 1cm off bending. These results do match my prediction because the more force added to an object the more the object will have to bend/move etc. Evaluation I think the experiment went well, because our results were all accurate and in a graph all went together well in the line of best fit. The graph does show a very good line of best fit. Most off the results in the graph are not anomalous, however the results are not exact and a few are a little bit under or over the line of best fit. The results are quite accurate, but you would not be able to tell the difference of decimal points. We could improve this investigation by choosing a different variable, which would have been a little harder to work out answers. Lauren Ardolino 9CW ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations essays

  1. Mayfield School Investigation

    159 38 Rebecca Louise Collins 145 52 Clara Croft 158 48 Sarah Cullen 157 45 Elizabeth Dean 155 50 Sarah Ditchmoor 164 44 Maggie Dugan 149 53 Sioban Jane Ennis 156 57 Natasha Caralone Gate 132 40 Tanya Harding 153 40 Julie Harrison 130 36 Joanne Alicia Higgins 150 45

  2. Mayfield igh Investigation

    Year 11 Boys Heights (cm) Frequency Heights (cm) Cumulative frequency 145?h>150.5 1 145?h>150.5 1 150.5?h>160.5 2 150.5?h>160.5 3 160.5?h>165.5 7 160.5?h>165.5 10 165.5?h>170.5 1 165.5?h>170.5 11 170.5?h>175.5 2 170.5?h>175.5 13 175.5?h>195 8 175.5?h>195 21 The modal class is 175.5?h>195. The median class is (21+1)/2 which is 165.5?h>170.5.

  1. I am conducting an experiment to show the relationship between the rate of reaction ...

    10 1 9 F 23 19 2 9 F 29 17 3 9 F 39 35 4 9 F 37 28 5 9 F 29 30 6 9 F 17 40 7 9 F 36 14 8 9 F 13 12 9 9 F 18 16 1 10 M 30

  2. Statistical investigation.

    This was to ensure that I had sorted the data successfully with out any errors. I then used the random number formula on the spreadsheet to select the exact amount of data I needed from each section.. I made a table of all the random numbers I collected and used

  1. Introduction to arodynamics - Investigation into the design features of aircraft.

    This in turn prevents the airflow from reaching supersonic speeds until a much higher TAS is reached, thus raising the MCRIT number. The thinner wing section also significantly reduces drag and the Detachment Mach number (MDET). Figure 5. Resultant changes of drag with wing sweep A thinner cross section will

  2. Investigating a Bending Bridge.

    This is because I am only investigating this experiment with varying weight. (100mm) * The length of the bridge (900mm) Experiment B * The position of the weight must be in the same position. If it weren't it would mean that the moments on each side would be different.

  1. Telepathy Investigation.

    These shapes have been chosen because they are very different from one another and so will not be easily confused. For example, a five pointed star like this: has been chosen instead of this: because the 8 pointed star may be confused with the plus sign.

  2. Obtaining Zinc Oxide form Calamine

    Here are the percentage yields I worked out. Mass of Calamine used Mass of Zinc Oxide Weight of Zinc Oxide Produced (g) Percentage yield (%) 1.0 0.6 0.77 128.33 1.0 0.6 0.71 118.33 1.5 1.0 1.37 137.00 1.5 1.0 0.98 98.00 2.0 1.3 1.39 106.92 2.0 1.3 1.46 112.31 2.5 1.6 1.67 104.38 2.5 1.6 1.76 110.00 3.0

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work