• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Cavour was the most important and the most successful of the exponents of Italian Unification" How far do you agree with this assertion?

Extracts from this document...


"Cavour was the most important and the most successful of the exponents of Italian Unification." How far do you agree with this assertion? Italian unification had been achieved after decades of revolution interspersed with differing political ideas and agendas. Cavour, it would seem, had brought about the prestige and power Italy needed in the form of a powerful Piedmont, therefore realizing the pre 1848 notion of unification via the leading state of Piedmont. However despite the effects of his political and diplomatic activities, his motives were far from nationalistic in the true sense of Italy. Cavour was concerned mainly with his ambitions for a dominant Piedmont in Northern Italy indifferent to the situation in the South hoping not to be hindered by its inherent social and economic inadequacies. This inadvertently aided the wider drive for unification, benefiting from Cavour's diplomatic tact in achieving a vital French alliance and embarking on a successful foreign policy aiding the removal of foreign rule in Italy. ...read more.


Mazzini consistently deplored that, despite introducing liberal reforms, Cavour and most politicians in Turin suspected or even disliked the objective of national unification. Such fears were well founded since Cavour had a very narrow form of patriotism, preoccupied by the ambition of dominating an enlarged state in northern Italy1. This ambition however saw the modernization of the state, with improved infrastructure, and economic reforms vital in putting Piedmont ahead of other Italian states and subsequently advancing military power, inevitably furthering the cause for unification. Cavour was in effect a political opportunist intent on power for he disagreed greatly with Mazzini's principles with the argument that Italians could not achieve independence by themselves, tactfully omitting the fact that if they did attempt a dangerous 'levee en masse'2, Piedmont's conservative constitution and her dominant position in Italy would be greatly threatened and possibly destroyed. In order to ensure his position, he adopted certain underhand tactics such as falsely abetting with some of Mazzini's party in order to undermine their efforts and exploit any success that they might achieve. ...read more.


In conclusion it seems that Garibaldi was the most important and successful exponent in the unification of Italy. His combination of political adeptness, charismatic leadership and military competence played a major role in first conquering and unifying the South then prompting the unification of Italy as a whole. In 1860 Garibaldi set sail for Sicily with his 'thousand', volunteer army in the name of Victor Emmanuel II in order that the unrest created would provoke Piedmont to commit to the impoverished South, which Cavour had failed to address previously. Garibaldi's capture of Palermo, as well as arousing immense enthusiasm in public opinion, was proof that the Mazzinian idea of national unification might no longer be a utopian dream3. Cavour was not an exponent of Italian unification. He was merely pressurized into thinking on a broader more national level by Mazzini and Garibaldi who were vigorously intent on unification. If it were not for the sharp actions of Garibaldi and the legendary 'thousand' the north and south may not have been tied to form a unified Italian state so soon. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How far were Gandhi's actions after 1920 responsible for Indiagaining her independence in 1947?

    When the civil disobedience was recommenced, it was met with severe repression. Formally called off in 1934, Gandhi woke up to the realisation that the people as a whole were tired of conflict, and the masses which had supported him were more concerned with the realities of increasing cost of

  2. How far do you agree that it was Cavour's diplomacy rather that Garibaldi's ideas ...

    Another point to acknowledge when considering this source was that it was a British newspaper and Garibaldi was loved, in Britain nearly as greatly as in his native Italy4 Nonetheless, Garibaldi became the vital link between the masses and the politicians, with his legendary adventures making him a focal point for patriotic nationalist sentiment.

  1. How far is it true to say that 'having made Italy', Italian governments were ...

    Liberal Italy was so called not only because it was a constitutional monarchy rather than a republic, but also because power lay in the hands of the old aristocracy and middle classes as they felt that the peasants and working classes were too ignorant to use power responsibly.

  2. How has the role and impact of military rulers and civilian politicians differed in ...

    Sharif got a two third majority in the parliament. Thus Shariff adopted a new strategy of holding to the power. He used his power in parliament to secure his seat. He through the 13th amendment withdrew the power of President to dismiss the Parliament. Then in order to have a control over the military, he through another amendment in

  1. The rise of Fascism in Italy was the result of a conservative reaction to ...

    Italy, as the government was controlled by corrupt politicians who bribed the voters, thus controlling the elections and once in power were more interested in making personal gains rather than solving the problems of the people. Due to the decaying situation, thousands of Italians were forced to emigrate abroad.

  2. How successful was the government of King Philip II of Spain?

    This factional conflict was enhanced by Philip's chosen style of government and administration, based on his father Charles V. It was the largest in Europe, and due to Philip's micro managing style, it grew even more complex throughout his reign.

  1. How successful was Peel's Ministry 1841-1846?

    the working environment for workers safer, reducing fatalities where death was frequent. The '1842 Mines Act' forbade women and children under 10 to work underground, and the '1844 Factory Act' which was largely driven by Peel's home secretary, Sir James Graham, limited the hours children under 13 could work, and recommended safety improvements.

  2. Civil Service Reform.

    He was clearly not Margaret's type. In her view, the choice lay between Middleton and the Second Permanent Secretary in charge of Public Expenditure, Anthony Rawlinson. He was not only the best looking ... something that always cut ice with her.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work