• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Capital Punishment

Extracts from this document...


Capital Punishment A strong case can be made in principle for and against capital punishment. The argument in favor is based on justice and the nature of a moral community, which requires that each person respect the life and liberty of others. Those who commit vicious crimes destroy the basis on which a moral community rests and forfeit their rights to citizenship and even to life itself. The argument against is based on love and the nature of an ideal community in which forgiveness and the hope for redemption are guiding aims. Protection of the innocent requires that criminals be isolated, perhaps permanently. Just punishment is appropriate, but love never gives up even on those who show no love. The most compelling argument against capital punishment, however, is based on its actual administration in our society: the risk of killing an innocent person, disproportionate infliction on the poor and minorities, weakness of the deterrence argument, failure to recognize that destructive life histories of criminals may have damaged their humanity to the point that it is unfair to hold them fully accountable for their wrongdoing, and so on. Life imprisonment without parole serves the same purposes as capital punishment at less cost without the practical disadvantages and injustices of its actual practice. Churches should call for an immediate moratorium and work for the eventual end of the death penalty. ...read more.


Society may actually be pleased with, or at least content with, the value it is getting for its capital punishment dollar. Retributive Arguments Concerning Capital Punishment The retributive notion of punishment in general is that (a) as a foundational matter of justice, criminals deserve punishment, and (b) punishment should be equal to the harm done. In determining what counts as "punishment equal to harm," theorists further distinguish between two types of retributive punishment. First, lex talionis retribution involves punishment in kind and is commonly expressed in the expression "an eye for an eye." Second, lex salica retribution involves punishment through compensation, and the harm inflicted can be repaired by payment or atonement. Historically, capital punishment is most often associated lex talionis retribution. One of the most early written statements of capital punishment from the lex talionis or "eye for an eye" perspective is from the 18th century BCE Babylonian Law of Hammurabi: If a builder builds a house for someone, and does not construct it properly, and the house which he built falls in and kills its owner, then that builder shall be put to death. If it kills the son of the owner, then the son of that builder shall be put to death. Critics of classic lex talionis-oriented capital punishment point out several problems with this view. ...read more.


Dignity, humanity and love are foundational moral goods and as such are prima facie in nature. That is, they are each morally binding on face value until a stronger duty emerges with which it conflicts, thereby creating a moral dilemma. Defenders of capital punishment argue that retributive justice is one such conflicting duty. For, even though we are duty bound to acknowledge a criminal's dignity, the duty of retribution is also present and is in fact outweighs the other duties. A second direct attack on the practice of capital punishment is that, at least at present, it is virtually impossible to apply death sentences fairly. People on death row are typically poor and thus could not afford the best defense at their initial trial. They are also predominately Afro-American or Hispanic which raises larger issues of racial inequality in the US. As ethnic minorities, they are also likely to receive more strict judgments from juries than their white counterparts who commit the same crime. These considerations recently prompted a US Supreme Court Justice to change his own views on capital punishment and reject the practice. In addition to problems of class bias, the practice of capital punishment is further tainted by the tragic fact that innocent people are sometimes executed. Eliminating capital punishment not only prevents their wrongful execution, but gives them more time to to clear their names and return to society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Free essay

    "Death is nothing to us." How good are the Epicurean arguments for this ...

    They believe we reach that by being virtuous and committed to our morals as well as others, via friendships and being a part of the community. Freedom of pain and trouble is what we really want. If one is already happy and leads a satisfying and Epicurean life, then one

  2. Capital Punishment: Explain what differing Christian attitudes might be to Capital Punishment

    As Jesus does not condemn the woman the story suggests that because no person on earth is without sin, then no one has the right to carry out Capital Punishment.

  1. Capital Punishment

    The utilitarian principle is bound to regard punishment itself as undesirable. According to the utilitarian maxim of maximising happiness and avoiding pain, any deliberate infliction of pain could only be justified utilitarianly provided it resulted in greater happiness or satisfactions.

  2. Capital Punishment Workshop.

    When her technique of calling Macbeth a coward fails and then her technique of using reverse physiology doesn't work either she resorts to flirting and seducing Macbeth until she gets what she wants. The next thing we studied in class was two articles, which explored the inns and outs of capital punishment.

  1. Capital Punishment

    Public executions were abolished in 1868, and in the 1970s beheading, hanging and quartering of traitors were all eliminated. Less than one century later, Parliament voted to suspend for five years the death penalty for murder, when it passed Sidney Silverman's private members bill in 1965.

  2. Speed Kills.

    "It's really, really shocking," says one pupil. "You don't really realise the magnitude of what can happen through speeding." Money matters Another way that young drivers are being targeted is through their wallets. Eighteen year old Sean Duffy has an insurance quote of �3,000 - a quote that can be reduced through the Pass Plus scheme.

  1. Reconciliation and Punishment

    However his Father forgave him instantly. This shows if you are truly sorry for sins God will always forgive you. The parable teaches us affectively on how to follow the way of God. Forgiveness is not always handed out by God we also as good Catholics need to learn to forgive others.

  2. Analyse the philosophical principles of at least one ethical theory and evaluate its application ...

    killing a killer may be too harsh a punishment for some murders, but this objection is purely one of application if the penalty is accepted on principle. Arguing against it would require showing that even the most heinous crime should not be punished by death.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work