• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Different religious and philosophical views on controversial topics.

Extracts from this document...


Jonathan Lloyd PRE assessed essay The smallest wonder Amillia, born only 21 weeks and six days after conception, is the most premature baby ever to survive. In England the cut-off point for abortion with no medical reason is 24 weeks, Amillia is destined to grow into a healthy human being, and so does abortion amount to murder? Buddhist A Buddhist would say that all life is sacred and should never be taken away, and to have an abortion would amount to murder and as such would place the worst kind of bad karma upon your soul. The first Buddhist precept is do not kill, this is to say that to take the life of any living creature is wrong and because they believe in ensoulment at birth that even a foetus is considered living. However, they would also say that intention is a great factor and as such if you mean well and spare the mother or the child future pain then abortion may not give as much bad karma. Utilitarian A utilitarian would say that this proves that the abortion cut-off point is too long because no amount of pain on the parent's part would ever account for all of the pleasure in the child's life. However if the child was to be handicapped and would not have the ability to live with an acceptable quality of life then it would cause less pain overall to abort the birth. ...read more.


In order to follow the first precept we should not harm any living being and if we pollute our planet and make it uninhabitable by global warming we are, by proxy harming the life upon it which would douse every soul who is apathetic to this issue with a large amount of bad karma, thus making this an ethical issue rather than purely scientific. Utilitarian A utilitarian would say that if we destroy our planet's ecosystem then we will also cause a large amount of suffering and even death to the people who live upon it and are therefore causing much more pain than any pleasure that could ever be generated by the use of the technology that creates that pollution. Allowing it to continue therefore is unethical. Kantian A Kantian would say that we have a duty to protect our planet and that if all humans were to allow global warming to continue then we would be in a negative position and as such it is in breach of the rule of university. He would also say that by allowing our planet to fall into a state of disrepair we are also in breach of our duty to protect the human race. As such, in Kant's opinion, this is most definitely an ethical issue. Christian A Christian would say that since the earth is God's creation we have a moral duty to keep it in good order, because all of God's creations are inherently sacred. ...read more.


However he would also say that we have a duty to protect world piece so unless the opposition is in threat of thus then the war is unethical. As for the Iraq war, Saddam may have been a threat to world peace due to the possibility of him being in possession of weapons of mass destruction. Christian A Christian would say that war is right as long as it is in the name of righteousness and as such if war is in the name of the lord or any Christian ideals then it is ethical. As for the Iraq war it was not in relation to the Christian God, however it was in protection of our allies and thus was protecting the weak and as such is, by Christian standards, ethical. Myself I believe that war and tribalism is in natural human instinct and that it is folly to deny this, as such war is a necessary and at some points is even a constructive solution. However I believe that as far as ethics goes, the Iraq war was not justified. In my opinion it was simply a poor excuse for an international scrap for oil and the only suspicions that they had weapons of mass destruction was that we sold them to them in the first place. It is strange that when no weapons were discovered in the more obvious areas that the search seemed to correlate quite consistently with the areas of the oil fields in that area... ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What is the relationship between religion and morality?

    Religious people call these their religious beliefs, and those with no religion will refer to them as their philosophy of life. These beliefs affect our behavior, so our beliefs determine our behavior. If God is the basis of moral values, then such values must be objective, and we are, therefore, faced with the following questions.

  2. In this essay I will talk about this question Do we need God to ...

    Some people who don't believe in god have said that if he was real the all the bad things in the world wouldn't be there, but if there wasn't people in the world who do bad things then maybe all the bad wouldn't be there.

  1. Analysis of Moral Luck Views of Aristotle and Epictetus.

    Being unconscious and performing involuntary actions, we cannot hold him responsible for anything he does. Let's analyze Epictetus' perspective through the same examples. Epictetus' main objective in his handbook was to distinguish between things that are up to us and things that are not up to us.

  2. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    that any one person makes is to follow the maxim that it should create the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Of course there are more complicated explanations (and alterations) of this theory, but in sum, this is the main point.

  1. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    Christian Aid give their help by supplying food for people who are undernourished and who suffer from malnutrition. They try to "help the poor to help themselves". What they mean is that they can teach them how to help themselves and others rather than being dependant upon others all the time.

  2. Euthanasia can never be justified

    People argue that euthanasia can be in someone's best interest, but they can be wrong because there can be many situations where euthanasia isn't in a patient's best interest. For example, if the diagnosis is wrong and the patient is not terminally ill or if the doctor's prediction as to

  1. Christian Views on Wealth & poverty

    In Matthew 6:19-34, Jesus tells us; to not store up riches for ourselves here on Earth, where they are not eternal, where they can decay, and be stolen. Instead, he tells us to store up the riches for ourselves in heaven.

  2. How far do you consider these views to be justified?

    In addition, emotive statements have the aim to motivate other to act in similar ways this is because some philosophers believe Emotivism to be an unjustified theory.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work