• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discussing Euthanasia, more commonly known as mercy killing.

Extracts from this document...


Euthanasia Euthanasia, more commonly known as 'mercy killing', is a contentious issue that is debated more and more these days. The Oxford English Dictionary defines euthanasia as `a gentle and easy death: bringing about of this, especially in the case of an incurable and painful disease`. Euthanasia would usually be the injection of a lethal dose of medication administered by a doctor. In this essay I intend to explore the various arguments surrounding euthanasia and I will put forward my reasons for claiming that euthanasia is morally unacceptable. One of the more common arguments in support of euthanasia is that it stops the pain of the terminally ill sufferer once and for all, so called 'mercy killing'. Some people argue that if a patient were in a lot of pain and distress it would be better to give them an `easy` and humane death. While this may be acceptable for a sick and dying dog, I ask you, is it really an acceptable way to treat a human? On the other hand there are often others, especially in the Hospice movement who maintain that if given the right treatment sufferers do not need to endure pain. ...read more.


Euthanasia may stop the pain and suffering of watching a loved one die but it also adds the extra burden on relatives who may have to live with, perhaps, a lifetime of guilt. Should euthanasia be legalised or not? The medical profession, like society in general, is split on this issue. Some doctors say that withholding the treatment of a patient in a deep coma-like state called Persistent Vegetative State (PVS) is acceptable in some circumstances. Ninety percent of specialists think that treatment should be withheld in some situations for patients diagnosed with PVS, a state in which patients are never expected to regain consciousness. These unfortunate people still need to be fed and cared for - they are still alive. It is said to be a waste of resources striving to keep alive a person who is never likely to wake up. In my opinion, the main problem with this is in the two phrases, " never expected" and " never likely." This shows there is a window for error that the doctors themselves admit. That is probably why only nineteen percent of doctors would be willing to administer the lethal injection themselves. What if the patient were wrongly diagnosed with PVS? ...read more.


Would there be any guarantee that a law dealing with Euthanasia would not be abused in the same way? In addition, policing a law such as euthanasia would be virtually impossible since the only person who could bring the charge against a doctor who committed euthanasia would be dead! In this essay I have explored some of the arguments on the contentious, and hotly debated, issue of euthanasia. Some people claim that euthanasia is acceptable as it ends the pain and suffering of the patient, however, in my opinion euthanasia should not be permitted under any circumstances. Hospices provide treatment that can prevent terminally ill patients from suffering pain so that their final hours can be comfortable and, as I have found out, even cure patients that were considered 'hopeless cases'. I also firmly believe that if the relatives had to make the decision about euthanasia it would cause a lot of arguments and guilt among families afterwards. I have also considered the possibility of a lethal injection being given to a person `diagnosed` with PVS and have concluded that legalising euthanasia would be in fact legalising murder under certain conditions rather than in all cases `a gentle and easy death`. In conclusion, it is my view that euthanasia is morally wrong and should not be legalised. ?? ?? ?? ?? Should Euthanasia be Legalised? Matthew Williams 5 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. Euthanasia essay

    God gave life to us as a gift and which 'we are called apon to preserve it and make it fruitful'(decalaration on Euthanasia,1980) To take someones life opposes gods love for that person , and rejects the duty of the person to live according to god's plan.

  2. Euthanasia -Humane or insane?

    USA and Belgium, where there is a law specifically allowing doctors to prescribe lethal drugs for the purpose of euthanasia. In the Belgium it is practised widely, but it is essential that a clergyman is present. I believe that everyone has the right to choose how they live and die.

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    If I loved someone I would respect their wishes." Every persons answer was very similar to these two. Overall I believe that the reason for Euthanasia out way the reasons against it. I believe that no matter how advanced medicine is there is no way to stop some peoples suffering other than Euthanasia.

  2. How merciful is mercy killing?

    A living will is a document written in advance to give instructions regarding medical care where the person is no longer able to do so directly. However there are numerous problems with these living wills. The language used is often vague and leaves much room for interpretations.

  1. What is meant by euthanasia?

    This is what we call the slippery slope which is talked about later in R3. I think that what Dr Brand said in the article reflects the problems that doctors face. ' To assume doctors can help life or death is nonsense '.

  2. Choose a case which you consider to be of crucial importance for medical ethics ...

    autonomy and right to self determination overruled, simply because of a disability. For example in the Netherlands it is even possible to be granted voluntary euthanasia if your are not terminally ill, for example being paraplegic is sufficient ground.9 Overall the significance of the decision in Pretty v United Kingdom

  1. Is Euthanasia morally acceptable?

    decided that their life has lost its meaning or value their decision should be respected. My questionnaire questions regarding this secondary question show that five out of the six who ticked yes to the question 'Does only God have the right to give and take life?'

  2. Death before Death - Murder in the guise of Mercy

    Have we, our children, the world not realised that today if our elders are suffering and need our help then tomorrow we too will become old and will need our children's help as well. Another elucidation is those who oppose legalizing euthanasia argue that medically justifying mercy killing might lead to the kinds of abuses that occurred in Nazi Germany.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work