• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Singer's Practical Ethics: Poverty

Extracts from this document...


Singer's Practical Ethics: Poverty St. Augustine once stated, "The superfluities of the rich are the necessities of the poor. When you possess in excess, you possess what belongs to the poor" (Church 3). This quotation expresses that the less fortunate in our world deserve to own a part of all the excess luxuries that are owned by the more wealthy people. Therefore, anything beyond the necessities of life can be considered something that the poor should retain. This idea is very similar to that of Peter Singer, who contends that the injustice of people who live in abundance while others starve is morally inexcusable. He argues that anyone who is able to aid the poor ought to donate in order to help the crisis of world poverty and similar endeavors. Singer explains that if one is already living comfortably, the act of acquiring luxuries to increase pleasure does not entail the same moral importance as saving someone's life. Since he is a utilitarian, he judges whether acts are right or wrong based on the consequences the action brings. Therefore, if the consequence of the wealthy people's failure to donate money is that another poor person dies, then that is just as bad as killing them, since they are consciously letting them die. In his work, Practical Ethics, Singer offers his thoughts about one's obligations to world poverty and suggests what must be done to fix this dilemma. He questions whether it is ethical for people to live a life of luxury while they allow others to barely survive, or even die. ...read more.


The idea of one's duty is fundamental to Kant's beliefs, as it is universally what people should do. Lastly, similar to Mill and Bentham, Singer tries to decrease the pain of the poor and increase their pleasures. Unfortunately, the outcome is that the affluent must always be negatively affected in order for the problem to be fixed. Singer feels that if it is in one's power to prevent something bad from happening, without sacrificing something of comparable moral significance, one ought to do it. Since absolute poverty is bad and due to the fact that there is some absolute poverty that can be prevented without sacrificing something of comparable moral significance, some absolute poverty ought to be prevented. Singer offers the example that if he is on his way to give a lecture and comes across a child who is drowning; he should take the time to save the child if it is in his power to do so. There are consequences of stopping to save the child, for instance he will be late to his lecture and his clothes may get dirty; but they are not of comparable moral significance to saving the life of a child. Singer says, "We have an obligation to help those in absolute poverty that is no less strong than our obligation to rescue a drowning child from a pond. Not to help would be wrong, whether or not it is intrinsically equivalent to killing" (230). Similarly, parents are, for the most part, in charge of their own families: they are expected to feed their own children before others. ...read more.


Four-fifths of the world's population has never made a phone call. The average family in the United States spends almost one-third of its income on luxuries (Church 4). So much of our income is spent on things that are not necessary to our lives and health. However, if the money was donated to an organization, it could mean the difference between survivals. In his work, Practical Ethics, Singer explores whether it is moral to live without contributing money to help people who are dying from hunger, malnourishment, and disease. He recognizes that there are many people who can afford to donate to organizations, but the problem is that they do not do so. He states, "If allowing someone to die is not intrinsically different from killing someone, it would seem that we are all murderers" (222). Singer responded to the multiple claims of the difference between killing and letting someone die, and in conclusion, the consequences are the same: people die whether one intentionally kills someone or passively lets them die. Singer's stance is that the problem is how the wealth is distributed in the world. There is no reason why some people should lead such luxurious lives, while worrying about nonessential lavishness, as opposed to one's survival like those in absolute poverty do. As people who live in a country of absolute affluence, we are all in the situation where we can choose between sacrificing our luxuries to save a child versus living in excess and allowing the poor to die. What if everything that we take for granted was removed from our lives? We would then live day to day as a means to survive, and only then would we truly understand the lives of those in absolute poverty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Charities, Poverty and Development essays

  1. This essay outlines, contrasts and critically discusses two definitions of poverty, namely absolute and ...

    in the present time...a creditable day labourer would be ashamed to appear in public without a linen shirt. (Adam Smith) There are within both definitions of poverty absolute or relative notable similarities. Both forms refer to the basic needs of people to survive.

  2. Inequality is the main reason for the persistence of poverty - Discuss.

    Poor entrepreneurs can never break out of wage earning because they do not have access to credit for the 'set-up' costs and other capital costs of starting an enterprise. The poor are likely to remain poor because they are trapped as wage earners.

  1. Explain the terms 'Relative poverty', 'Absolute Poverty' and 'Culture of Poverty'.

    which might correspond with the descriptions of a culture of poverty given by Lewis" (1977). 2. Compare and Contrast at least 3 different Sociological Perspectives on Poverty. Ideas have changed since The American Government failed when attempting to eradicate poverty in the 1960's.

  2. To What Extent Is the Welfare State Responsible For Creating a Culture of Dependency?

    - Because of the enormous financial cost of the Welfare State the level of benefits is too low. They argue that by concentrating selectively, the same money could provide better services for fewer people. - The Welfare State is too bureaucratic and impersonal and increasingly controls our lives.

  1. The Relation Between Consumerism and Poverty

    In both cases, much of the problem is consumerism. With absolute poverty it is less direct, though more obvious in that consumerism means that there is an uneven distribution of necessities, as the rich have everything they want (and if they do not have it, they will get it), whereas

  2. Identify four causes of the increase in poverty and vagrancy in the Tudor period.

    However, it never got of the ground, instead the 1536 poor law act was introduced. This was a watered down version of Marshal's bill, which ignored the public works scheme funded by income tax perhaps because it would mean MP's and members of the council giving up money.

  1. Wealth and Poverty

    Each year more than �200 million is raised each year. Over �10 million raised from governments, institutional donors and other aid agencies, the CAFOD's supporters meant that CAFOD's income in 2002/03 was more than �30 million. CAFOD spends 85 to 90 pence out of every �1 donated directly on our

  2. RE poverty

    Long-term aid is an attempt to help communities out of the poverty cycle. This is achieved through long-term projects and investment, such as building a school, or a clean water supply. But in these cases, CAFOD tend to support local charities by providing mainly money, but they also send Catholic

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work