• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The issue of whether it is reasonable or not to believe in miracles is a complex and divided matter. There are many varied opinions on what a miracle actually is so each need to be assessed and a reasonable evaluation given.

Extracts from this document...


Miracles Edward Cohen 2) The issue of whether it is reasonable or not to believe in miracles is a complex and divided matter. There are many varied opinions on what a miracle actually is so each need to be assessed and a reasonable evaluation given. Starting with Hume, he defines it as 'A transgression of a law of nature brought about by a particular violation of the Deity.' He would also go as far to say that the Christian faith is closely linked with miracles both when it started and today. Christianity is not reasonable and this belief flies in the face of all understanding and experience. Hume feels that miracles is the absolute last resort of explanation for any happening, one must look at all possibilities before coming to that particular conclusion. Mel Thompson in "Teach Yourself Philosophy of Religion" sees Hume's ideas as a simplistic view on miracles based on an eighteenth century view of the universe. He feels that miracles are a natural process, speeded up and a natural event happening at just the right moment. ...read more.


Hume was therefore arguing that it is always more reasonable to reject extraordinary beings as being contrary to the weight of the human experience. There is no evidence to count against the weight of human experience, because the testimonies of people who claim the experience of the miraculous are rarely of any quality. The evidence to support miraculous events is often contradictory and is always tainted by primitive superstition. Hume would only accept evidence from educated and intellectual sources, only a truly trusted source can there even begin to be any debate of whether a miracle has taken place or not. Hume also stated that all founding figures performed miracles, that religions base their claims for authority on these miracles. Yet they cannot be right. These stories must cancel out the claims of the religions. Hume made four basic argument against miracles, the first is there are witnesses of "good sense, education and learning" can a peasant witness be taken seriously? ...read more.


The mere idea that religions based their faith on miracles is untrue also, apart from Jesus who mainly performed miracles out of compassion rather than to show authority no other religion makes such claims. He also fails to see how an individual should respond to a miracle that they have experienced, experience of a miracle would surely count as evidence to a person. Maurice Wiles also makes his arguments against miracles, and God's action in the world would not be confined to certain instances. Rather the "idea of a divine action should be in relation to the world as a whole." There is therefore no single act of God applicable to an instance, but a constant act of God applying to the world as a whole. Wiles considers a God that interferes in the laws of nature to be arbitrary - if God does intervene, why is there suffering in the world? Why does God intervene where children are suffering? It is on this note that having taking into account the various arguments miracles do not occur as a God who performs such acts is random, unknowable and not Omni - benevolent, therefore miracles should not be believed in. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Miracles section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Miracles essays

  1. David Hume and Miracles.

    He does not specify exactly how many would be sufficient. The individual reader is left to guess. These witnesses must be of unquestionable sanity and educated to a standard which Hume decides not to establish again. Adding still more criteria it becomes apparent that Hume is not particularly keen to admit that a miracle has ever occurred.

  2. R.S. Coursework - miracles

    retardation or emotionally e.g. wish to commit suicide. Through miracles, God shows how He is able to defeat evil, Satan and help people to prevaricate between right and wrong. The above miracle happened nearly instantly but there are miracles which take up to months for a person to be cured, therefore, although events that have taken place in

  1. Is it reasonable to expect people to believe in miracles in a modern scientific ...

    Augustine looked on miracles, not as incidents that were violations of the ´┐Żlaws of nature´┐Ż but as violations of what was at present known about the natural world. Christians go on to say that by arguing that the laws of nature cannot be broken gives scientific statements a status they do not possess.

  2. Miracles. Many people have different views on what a miracle really is. For ...

    leave a number of people, this shows how great his power was and that the demons feared him. The friends of the diseased people showed great faith and believed that Jesus could heal their friends. Jesus also showed that the Kingdom of God was stronger than the kingdom of Satan and that Satan was being defeated.

  1. Describe the importance of the healing miracles of Jesus for Christian life today. ...

    If Jesus had of followed what people were doing in his time he would of just ignored the woman he healed but he did not. In Lukes gospel there are many different healing miracles recorded that each have an important message and can help Christians today in their lives.

  2. 'Miracles are a matter of faith, not fact', discuss.

    Nonetheless, contemporary scientific opinion perceives the laws of nature as more fluid. Miraculous events are therefore more easily acceptable, but still not necessarily divine. The theist also has a terse reply to Hume's assault. Hume's view is based on the terms of naturalism (belief that there is no power higher

  1. What is a miracle?

    event has no real religious significance and cannot be confirmed as a miracle. In addition to this, Holland's interpretation makes the occurrence of a miracle down to personal interpretation. This is a problem, as it will vary from person to person, as what one person may class a miracle, another may not.

  2. Examine the arguments, which can be used to discredit belief in miracles - In ...

    Despite the fact that Aquinas proposed an adaptable definition that is appropriate in our lives today and somewhat explained the position of God as an interventionist, there are still notable faults in his argument which undermine not only the existence of miracles, but how to define them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work