• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory? Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that the moral decision is the one which will produce the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. It is also sometimes known as the theory of usefulness. Usefulness refers to the amount of pleasure or happiness caused by an action. Today there are three main types of utilitarianism: act, rule, and preference. Act utilitarians maintain that the good action is the one that leads to the greatest good in a particular situation. Act utilitarianism is flexible and is able to take into account individual situations at a given moment. Act utilitarians believe that when determining whether the act is right, it is the value of the consequences of the particular act that count. If a law needs to broken to ensure that the greater happiness will result, then it is permissible to do so. The problem with act utilitarianism is that it has the potential to justify virtually any act. Rule utilitarians establish the vest overall rule by determining the course of action, which, when pursued by the whole community, leads to the greatest result. Some rules are necessary for us to follow in the quest to maximise happiness. ...read more.

Middle

The theory seems to conflict with the idea of human rights. Utilitarianism can be used to provide grounds for denying basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom from torture, or even life itself. However, we know that these basic rights provide a basis in our morality for the way we act towards each other, therefore to go against them would surely be immoral? This was further developed by John Rawls. He argued that utilitarianism is too impersonal. In its pursuit of the greater good, utilitarianism disregards the rights of the individual. Utilitarianism could be used to promote a dictatorship, in which personal decisions were made to over-ride the interests on the individual in favour of the greater good of society. He believes that utilitarianism is therefore flawed. John Stuart Mill tried to solve this problem of the neglect of the well-being of the individual with his theory of utilitarianism. He argued that the well-being of the individual is of greatest importance, and the happiness is most effectively gained when individuals are free to pursue their own ends, however these are subject to rules that protect the common good of all. He believed that this problem could be solved by focusing on qualitative pleasures, rather than quantitative ones as in Bentham's theory. ...read more.

Conclusion

Furthermore, it is sensible to link morality with happiness. Moral decisions result in the happiness of the person, whether it is immediately or in the future, however it is the happiness of all people, which no ethical theory can promise to produce. Finally, no special wisdom is needed to apply the hedonic calculus. It is an ethical theory that is accessible to everyone and doesn't require you to be highly educated to understand it. Perhaps this could be why it is highly attractive to many people. In conclusion, utilitarianism aims to produce happiness. It is an unselfish ethical theory as it takes into consideration the community rather than the individual; however I believe its greatest strength is also its greatest fault. By taking into consideration the greater community rather than the individual it is eliminating the concerns of the minority and it is here where immoral behaviour can creep in. The hedonic calculus can be used to justify any action; no matter how horrendous it is, as long as it produces the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people. Therefore, I do not believe utilitarianism to be an ethical theory that should be adopted by the masses, rather solely be organisations as it is the simplest means to make a decision where the majority can agree on. ?? ?? ?? ?? Jae-Tremae Smith-Young Religious Studies: Ethics Ms. Molyneux ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Explain Virtue ethics - its strengths and weaknesses?

    But in that case on person's virtue may be another's vice, and one person vice in one set of circumstances may be another's virtue.

  2. What are the main features of classical utilitarianism? Assess the strengths and weaknesses ...

    The certainty is almost guaranteed, he will be able to buy drink with the money. However the pleasure of the drunk will be tinged with pain because of the guilt he may experience in doing something dishonest and a possible hangover in the morning.

  1. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    He further maintains that moral principles are prima facie duties which are duties whose "intrinsic value is not dependant on circumstances [but] their application is."5 Prima facie translates: 'at first site' in Latin, we presume them to be of obligation when first approached, but may be superseded if the circumstances prescribe.

  2. Euthanasia can never be justified

    The patient thinks that they are a large burden on others and that they have no place in the community so believe that they would be better off dead. The patient feels they are under pressure because of a shortage of the resources that are needed to care for them.

  1. Utilitarianism. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism

    In theory, if everyone followed the rules of utilitarianism the world would be a happier place as it would ensure that the most amounts of people are happy.

  2. Explain how Aristotle and Alasdair Macintyre applied Virtue Theory to moral decision making?

    The point is that the virtuous individual has developed the disposition to know how and when to do that in the best way possible. For example, a lieutenant might decide that it is better to increase the happiness of his men at the expense of fulfilling his duty to obey lawful orders.

  1. "Miller's plays show is that happiness can only be achieved by making moral compromises" ...

    Therefore, Ann was making moral compromises by concealing the fact that she knew Larry was dead in order to protect Kate's happiness - "I'm not trying to hurt you Kate". However in the end, as shown by this example, moral compromises can lead to chaos and disaster.

  2. With reference to abortion, examine and comment on the view that the sanctity of ...

    A situationist would look at the outcome and not see this as an immoral action as the woman was doing the loving thing by protecting her children. The point of situation ethics is not to forget the rules; a situationist does not start from nothing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work