• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Find out how changing the surface which a margarine tub is launch on, influences how long it takes it stop.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Science Investigation to see how changing a surface affects the stopping distance of a margarine tub.

Aim:

        I am going to find out how changing the surface which a margarine tub is launch on, influences how long it takes it stop.

Variables:

        During this test I have a chance at changing the variables, which are:

  • Mass, (how much weight I amply to the tub) If I changed the mass in the tub, it would either get heavier or lighter. If the mass increased the pressure on the surface would also increase, which would push the tub against the surface harder so it will slow down more as its more likely to hit fibres/particles.
  • Surface (how rough or smooth the surface it) If I change the surface to a smoother one, it will slide better and take longer for it to slow down, as there want be as much friction acting on the base of the tub, as there is less fibres/particles sticking up, which would come into contact with the base of the tub.
  • Thrust (how much energy I use to propel the tub forward) If I propel the tub faster, then it will take longer for the tub to slow down, as it has to slow down from a higher speed.
  • Size ( how big the tub is (how large the surface area is, which is in contact with the running surface) If I increase the surface area of the tub, then there will not be more friction, but just a larger area on which friction will act, and so will slow the tub down.  
...read more.

Middle

    We will measure the distance it took the tub to stop in Centimetres, and measure from the front of the stool to the back edge of the tub. This will help keep the test fair, as we will not be measuring to different places for each launch.  To make the thrust given to the tub each time, is the same, I will use a Newton meter, and pull the elastic band back 10N.

  • Set up equipment (as shown below)
  • Choose a surface, and record which one you have chosen
  • Lay the surface down, and get the tub ready for launch
  • Put the tub in the centre of the elastic band, and pull it back till the tub is on the pre-set line, for launching
  • When ready release the tub, and leave it until it was come to a complete stop, some wear along the surface.
  • Get a measuring device (metre stick/ tape measure) and measure from the front of the stool, to the back of the tub.
  • Record the distance next to the surface, and repeat that same test 1 or 2  times more.
  • When you have 2 results for that test, then change the surface, and repeat the process.

        The experiment isn’t that dangerous, but we will make sure that no one is standing in the firing line of the tub, so not to hit anyone.

...read more.

Conclusion

Evaluation:

        The test was a success as I got good results, which proved my prediction correct. We had no problems recording the data in my table or inputting it on to a graph. The equipment I used was reliable and all help keep the test fare and make the measurement accurate. The results were accurate, because we repeated the experiment so to make sure the test went right and something hadn’t gone wrong, like the tub taking off as the elastic band launched it, as this would of made the distance much further as the tub would of covered ground without the surface affecting it.

        The only result which I wasn’t to worried about was the sandpaper, as I thought it would have had a shorter stopping distance, but I was reassured after I tested it again, and the distance was about the same. I had enough results to show ‘how changing the surface will affect the stopping distance of a margarine tub ’As I could prove my prediction right. If I repeated the experiment again, I wouldn’t need to change anything, apart from using more surfaces. But it would have been easier to use something else to measure the tension of the elastic band, as unhooking the Newton meter was difficult with out moving the elastic band.          

image02.png

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To investigate the factors that affect the stopping distance of a catapulted margarine tub. ...

    4 star(s)

    If I did not measure how far I pulled the elastic band back, it would affect my results because the elastic band would have different amounts of EPE each time. The EPE turns into the KE which propels the tub forwards, EPE so if the EPE changed, then the KE would do so as well.

  2. How does the weight of an object affect the friction it has on the ...

    Mass of block of wood (g) Average force needed to overcome static friction (N) (1dp) Weight (R) (2dp) Average coefficient of friction (2dp) 325 1.9 4.19 0.47 475 2.6 4.66 0.56 625 3.6 6.13 0.59 825 4.8 8.09 0.59 975 5.8 9.56 0.60 1125 6.8 11.03 0.62 1275 8.0 12.50

  1. To see how the distance, a weighted margarine tub travels, changes as the distance ...

    So if I did the experiment again, I would also probably get a larger elastic band, so that two don't have to be tied together. Further work that I could do is to change the mass in the tub; instead of changing the distance the tub is pulled back.

  2. Margarine Tub

    14.5 14.5 13.8 The table above shows my results; I measured to the nearest half centimeter whilst I was collecting my results and worked out the average to the nearest millimetre. As you can see there is an anomaly, (81 cm for 50 grams)

  1. In this experiment I aim to find out how the force and mass affect ...

    Due to human error and reaction time, these results could not be relied on completely, but did give us a rough idea. If we were to conduct the experiment again, I would save time by just producing results using the computer system with light gate.

  2. Physics - how the launch height affects the horizontal distance a ski jumper travels ...

    the ramp and this would mean that the distance it was likely to travel would change. We made sure there was no sand left on the ball by cleaning it with a clean cloth before each run. We also had to make sure that there was not a slight breeze

  1. Approximate Stopping Distances

    Thinking distance depends on the speed the vehicle is travelling at and the reaction time of the driver. The human brain responds quickly but not instantaneously. It may take from 0.2 seconds to over 1 second to respond to something depending on the age and other factors of that person.

  2. Mechanical Properties of a Meter Rule

    The length taken for the results were the difference between the hole and the centre of the whole rule. (X2 on diagram 'rough trials apparatus 2'). PROPLEMS WITH EXPERIMENT: I had quite a few problems with the way I set my experiment up: 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work