• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12

Investigation to Determine how the Height of a slope Affects the Speed of an Object Travelling Down the Slope

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Investigation to Determine how the Height of a slope Affects the Speed of an Object Travelling Down the Slope

Prediction

I predict that the higher the slope the faster the speed of the object travelling down the slope. This is because the higher the slope, the more gravitational potential energy an object has when it is at the top of the slope and as the object travels down the slope gravitational potential energy is being converted in kinetic energy so the more gravitational potential energy the object has at the top, the greater the kinetic energy at the bottom and the greater the kinetic energy the greater the speed.

g.p.e.=mgh                                           k.e.=½mv²

g.p.e. is gravitational potential energy    k.e. is kinetic energy

m is the mass of the object                      m is the mass of the object

g is the gravitational field strength           v is the velocity of the object

h is the height the object is at

These formulas show that gravitational potential energy is related to height and that kinetic energy is related to speed. Because of the laws of conservation of energy, energy is never lost, only converted to different forms, the gravitational potential energy at the top of the slope is roughly the same as the kinetic energy at the bottom although some energy is converted to heat because of friction. This allows me to work out a formula that links the speed or velocity of an object to the height it started at.

g.p.e.=k.e.                        sub in equations

mgh=½mv²                        divide by mass

gh=½v²                        multiply by 2

v²=2gh                        square root

v=√2gh                        sub in gravitational field strength of earth

v=√20hThis is the equation linking speed to height

...read more.

Middle

v=√20h

                                  =√(20*0.5)

                                  =√1000

=3.16m/s

45cm/0.45m                        v=√20h

                                  =√(20*0.45)

                                  =3.00m/s

40cm/0.4m                        v=√20h

                                  =√(20*0.4)

                                  =2.83m/s

35cm/0.35m                        v=√20h

                                  =√(20*0.35)

  =2.65m/s

30cm/0.3m                        v=√20h

                                  =√(20*0.3)

                                  =2.45m/s

25cm/0.25m                        v=√20h

                                  =√(20*0.25)

=2.24m/s

20cm/0.2m                        v=√20h

                                  =√(20*0.2)

                                  =2.00m/s

15cm/0.15m                        v=√20h

                                  =√(20*0.15)

                                  =1.73m/s

10cm/0.1m                        v=√20h

                                  =√(20*0.1)

                                  =1.41m/s

The speeds we record should be slightly lower due to friction

        To keep the experiment accurate we will use a barrier to help us to know when the marble has reached the end of the run-off distance and eliminate as much human error as possible. To keep the marble rolling in a straight line we will use a drainpipe cut in half because it has raised walls. Every time we change the height of the slope we will also re-measure the length of the run-off distance because as the slope is raised the end of it gets further away from the barrier.

Fair Test

To make it as fair a test as possible I will use the same marble as the other marbles may have a different mass which will give them more gravitational potential energy and more kinetic energy, making them faster than a lighter marble. Also I will use the same length slope as if it is a longer slope, although it won’t have more gravitational potential energy than a shorter slope, it will be in contact with the slope more which means it will be affected by friction more and slow down.

...read more.

Conclusion

The main thing that altered the accuracy of both experiments was friction, so, to improve my method I would try and remove friction as much as possible by using a lubricant on the slope. I would use the trolley and light gate again because with a few improvements to the method it would b a lot more accurate than using a run-off distance and stopwatch because it should remove a lot of human error. I think that there was a problem in the experiment I did with the light gate because of the accuracy of the length of the piece of card, so, this time, after I have cut the card I will measure its length again in case when it was cut out it got larger or smaller than 10cm. The length I re-measure it as is the length I will use for my calculations because this will make them more accurate. The other problem with the light gate was the method of keeping the trolley travelling in a straight line, we had to use two parallel rulers which the trolley kept hitting, adding friction and slowing it down. So as well as lubricating slope I would lubricate the rulers to reduce friction there. I would keep the rest of the apparatus the same.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

  1. Investigation into Friction.

    For Graph 1, the smooth hardboard, the distances of the plotted points from the line of best fit are as follows in Table 5. Weight (R) / N Average reading on force meter (F)

  2. Investigate how the weight of an object affects the force required to overcome friction.

    I don't think that the evidence found in my experiment is sufficient to support a firm conclusion. Even though I think my results are accurate enough to show me correct patterns and trends, there are things apart from my anomalous results such as the coefficients of friction I have found

  1. What affects the acceleration of a trolley down a ramp?

    Looking at my acceleration graph it doesn't seem to be height 45cm that is the anomaly but the other results. I think this because it is height 45cm that fits on to the best-fit line and is closer to the predicted result and not heights 25, 35 and 40.

  2. Trolley Speed

    The bigger the gradient the more spaced out the dots will be because the trolley is travelling at a faster rate. The smaller the gradient the less spaced out the dots will be, indicating that the speed of the trolley is travelling at a slower rate.

  1. My investigation is about how the number of paperclips added onto a paper spinner ...

    Then the line would be slightly steeper. The r squared value is not very good because the points do not fit the line of best fit closely. The graph shows that increasing the weight of the spinner allows the spinner to fall slightly quicker.

  2. Investigation into factors affecting the speed of a car rolling down a ramp

    applied to my results: Energy lost = distance moved x force Force of friction (N) = energy lost (j)___ distance moved (m) I am assuming that the force of friction will be a uniform value because in each experiment it is the same surfaces in contact with each other (the wheels on the car and the ramp)

  1. INVESTIGATING HOW STEEPNESS AFFECTS SPEED

    1.87 1.85 1.84 Ping pong 2.4 13.5 85 1.47 1.43 1.46 1.45 Cricket 71.2 13.5 85 1.41 1.53 1.50 1.48 Practice golf ball 4.2 13.5 85 1.50 1.47 1.50 1.49 Results The aim of this investigation is to investigate how steepness affects speed so I will use the following formula

  2. Investigation is to see how changing the height of a ramp affects the stopping ...

    67.3 125.5 58 144 57.1 129 60.80 132.83 7 74.8 149.7 75.9 142 71.3 143 74.00 144.90 8 65.4 157 83.7 151.9 178.2 199.58 109.10 169.49 9 111.1 164.1 105.4 159.4 108.7 163.3 108.40 162.27 10 129 172.2 138.8 162.1 137.3 183.4 135.03 172.57 However this wasn't to be, overall

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work