• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12

# Investigation to Determine how the Height of a slope Affects the Speed of an Object Travelling Down the Slope

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Investigation to Determine how the Height of a slope Affects the Speed of an Object Travelling Down the Slope

## Prediction

I predict that the higher the slope the faster the speed of the object travelling down the slope. This is because the higher the slope, the more gravitational potential energy an object has when it is at the top of the slope and as the object travels down the slope gravitational potential energy is being converted in kinetic energy so the more gravitational potential energy the object has at the top, the greater the kinetic energy at the bottom and the greater the kinetic energy the greater the speed.

g.p.e.=mgh                                           k.e.=½mv²

g.p.e. is gravitational potential energy    k.e. is kinetic energy

m is the mass of the object                      m is the mass of the object

g is the gravitational field strength           v is the velocity of the object

h is the height the object is at

These formulas show that gravitational potential energy is related to height and that kinetic energy is related to speed. Because of the laws of conservation of energy, energy is never lost, only converted to different forms, the gravitational potential energy at the top of the slope is roughly the same as the kinetic energy at the bottom although some energy is converted to heat because of friction. This allows me to work out a formula that links the speed or velocity of an object to the height it started at.

g.p.e.=k.e.                        sub in equations

mgh=½mv²                        divide by mass

gh=½v²                        multiply by 2

v²=2gh                        square root

v=√2gh                        sub in gravitational field strength of earth

v=√20hThis is the equation linking speed to height

Middle

v=√20h

=√(20*0.5)

=√1000

=3.16m/s

45cm/0.45m                        v=√20h

=√(20*0.45)

=3.00m/s

40cm/0.4m                        v=√20h

=√(20*0.4)

=2.83m/s

35cm/0.35m                        v=√20h

=√(20*0.35)

=2.65m/s

30cm/0.3m                        v=√20h

=√(20*0.3)

=2.45m/s

25cm/0.25m                        v=√20h

=√(20*0.25)

=2.24m/s

20cm/0.2m                        v=√20h

=√(20*0.2)

=2.00m/s

15cm/0.15m                        v=√20h

=√(20*0.15)

=1.73m/s

10cm/0.1m                        v=√20h

=√(20*0.1)

=1.41m/s

The speeds we record should be slightly lower due to friction

To keep the experiment accurate we will use a barrier to help us to know when the marble has reached the end of the run-off distance and eliminate as much human error as possible. To keep the marble rolling in a straight line we will use a drainpipe cut in half because it has raised walls. Every time we change the height of the slope we will also re-measure the length of the run-off distance because as the slope is raised the end of it gets further away from the barrier.

Fair Test

To make it as fair a test as possible I will use the same marble as the other marbles may have a different mass which will give them more gravitational potential energy and more kinetic energy, making them faster than a lighter marble. Also I will use the same length slope as if it is a longer slope, although it won’t have more gravitational potential energy than a shorter slope, it will be in contact with the slope more which means it will be affected by friction more and slow down.

Conclusion

The main thing that altered the accuracy of both experiments was friction, so, to improve my method I would try and remove friction as much as possible by using a lubricant on the slope. I would use the trolley and light gate again because with a few improvements to the method it would b a lot more accurate than using a run-off distance and stopwatch because it should remove a lot of human error. I think that there was a problem in the experiment I did with the light gate because of the accuracy of the length of the piece of card, so, this time, after I have cut the card I will measure its length again in case when it was cut out it got larger or smaller than 10cm. The length I re-measure it as is the length I will use for my calculations because this will make them more accurate. The other problem with the light gate was the method of keeping the trolley travelling in a straight line, we had to use two parallel rulers which the trolley kept hitting, adding friction and slowing it down. So as well as lubricating slope I would lubricate the rulers to reduce friction there. I would keep the rest of the apparatus the same.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Forces and Motion section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related GCSE Forces and Motion essays

1. ## Physics Investigation: The effect of speed on braking distance

4 star(s)

As a result of this analysis of the methods, I decided to use the more proven and more accurate and reliable method, the Light-Gate. This is because it will be easier to record, less hassle, more time to work on the experiment as it will be very quick and easy

2. ## To investigate how the angle of a slope affects the acceleration of a marble.

Also that the formula to find the theoretical data works and the theoretical data shows the acceleration of an object rolling down a slope with none of its energy lost. Evaluation: The data I collected was quite good and follows the same basic pattern as the theoretical data.

1. ## INVESTIGATING HOW STEEPNESS AFFECTS SPEED

Distance rolled(cm) Mass of ball (g) 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Average (1 d.p) Angle (�C) (1 d.p) 4 85 2.4 2.35 2.13 2.19 2.16 2.28 2.22 2.6 7 85 2.4 1.72 1.94 1.97 1.75 1.63 1.80 4.7 15 85 2.4 1.28 1.32 1.34 1.38 1.32 1.32 10.0 18 85

2. ## My investigation is about how the number of paperclips added onto a paper spinner ...

This is visible from the line of best fit but the results do not support this theory very strongly because the points are not close to the trendline. Revised Method The method was slightly changed to prevent the problem of the spinner being dropped from different heights as the two

1. ## An investigation into factors that effect the braking distance of a trolley

In doing so, our results will be consistent. We recorded the results into the table and repeated each result 3 times. Once we had obtained the results containing the stopping distances, we worked out the averages to 1 decimal place.

2. ## Factors Affecting the Speed of a Car after Freewheeling down a Slope

When an object is realised from a height, it accelerates down the slope due to its Gravitational potential being converted into Kinetic energy (called Energy Conversion), until it reaches a flat surface when it continues to move (First Law of Motion)

1. ## Trolley Speed

Kinetic energy is a scalar quantity; it does not have a direction. Unlike velocity, acceleration, and momentum, the kinetic energy of an object is completely described by magnitude alone. Also friction is another factor that affects the speed of a trolley travelling down the ramp.

2. ## Investigation into Friction.

This is not a very large amount, and so it will not cause too much of an inaccuracy in the graph, because the average of the two is being plotted. The results for the rough hardboard, on the whole, are quite regular, and there are no anomalies.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to