• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why is sexual reproduction so common in nature?

Extracts from this document...


Why is sexual reproduction so common in nature? One of the greatest challenges for evolutionary biology is explaining the widespread occurrence of sexual reproduction, and the associated process of genetic recombination. Sexual reproduction involves one individual combining half its DNA with half of DNA of another individual, so that the offspring is only half genetic copy of each parent. However, in asexual reproduction, the offspring are genetic copies of the parent. Thus, sexual reproduction poses an evolutionary problem because it seems to be half as efficient a method of reproducing as asexual reproduction. Asexual females can potentially produce twice as many daughters as sexual females, so that the ratio of asexual to sexual females should initially double each generation, resulting in the 'two-fold cost of sex'.? In addition to this 50% cost and the dilution of the individual's genome, sexual reproduction also presents other disadvantages in comparison to asexual reproduction. First and foremost there is the cost of recombination - favourable gene combinations that have increased in frequency under the action of natural selection are broken up. Secondly, the process of sexual reproduction requires a significant cellular-mechanical cost as sex requires meiosis, syngamy and karyogamy. A great amount of time is taken up by these three processes alone, and far exceeds the time required for two mitotic divisions. Also, these processes are unnecessarily complicated if reproduction is sole objective. Asexual spores and meiosis-bypassing apomixis appears much more efficient. ...read more.


The second of the two modern day models ignores the effect of deleterious mutations and concentrates on external environmental change. This model suggests that sex accelerates adaptation to a changing environment by creating new gene combinations. The problem is to work out how environments could possibly change fast enough, ie: at a rate that makes sex beneficial every generation. Currently, the most interesting and promising hypothesis - the Red Queen - suggests that coevolution between hosts and parasites may generate environmental change at a rate that renders sex advantageous in the long term (the 'environment' for the parasite is the host's resistance mechanism, and the 'environment' for the host is the parasite's penetration mechanism). Usually parasites are assumed to provide the antagonistic driving force in this co-evolutionary dance, though host immune systems may laso do so. The dance is a consequence of time lagged selection by co-evolving parasites against common host genotypes, leading ultimately to sustained oscillations in host and gene frequencies. Substantial evidence has been provided to support the Red Queen Hypothesis, which is why it stands as one of the more convincing theories explaining the evolution of sex. For example, Baer et al. wrote a paper on how experimental variation in polyandry affects parasite loads and fitness in a bumble bee. Through artificially inseminating queens of a bumble bee with sperm of either high or low genetic diversity, they tested the hypothesis that genetic diversity among a female's offspring may offer some protection from parasitism. ...read more.


The alternative combination is that the environmental RQ hypothesis aids the MD process. The problem with the MD hypothesis is that high rates of deleterious mutations are required, often greater than one mutation/genome/generation. Most of the models used to describe the MD process often assume infinite populations often assume infinite populations and consider populations at equilibrium in mutation-selection balance, bypassing the fundamental dynamics required to reach this situation. The RQ hypothesis can be manipulated to solve such dilemmas, as it produces frequency-dependent selection and so slows down the spread of asexual clones, allowing more time for mutation-selection balance to attained. West et al. then go on to argue that the RQ hypothesis reduces the fitness advantage of asexuals, reducing the number of deleterious mutations that are needed to reduce the asexual fitness below that of sexual individuals. Furthermore, it may even increase the rate at which an asexual line accumulates mutations (through stochastic process of Muller's ratchet), leading to an increased reduction in fitness and therefore allowing mutation-selection balance to be reached more efficiently. The idea put forward by West et al. is important in attempting to explain the problem that although deleterious mutations and parasite-host coevolution are reasonable theories, it still has not been conclusively shown that either really explains how sex is maintained in nature. However, further tests still need to be carried out on the pluralistic approach, meaning that sex still persists as a puzzle for evolutionary biologists. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Variation and Inheritance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Response to the question

Very well done report.Response to the question done very well. Introduction is good, as is the main body of text which examines a range of different theories and the main evidence to go with it. Conclusion should be a lot ...

Read full review

Response to the question

Very well done report.Response to the question done very well. Introduction is good, as is the main body of text which examines a range of different theories and the main evidence to go with it. Conclusion should be a lot more in depth but it is adequate for this level. The response of the client is very clear throughout and well analysed.

Level of analysis

Technical terms expressed for this level are very advanced compared to what I would expect. Also, analysis and thought processes are a lot more in depth. Also shows examples of looking at a wide range of sources to reach their conclusions which are presented in a very appropriate straight forward analytical way. The only criticism is that the conclusion should be more stand alone and the different reasons for the trains of thought that he examined weighed up and a more appropriate conclusion and the reasons for it reached. Could also include graphs and scientific research data from reports.

Quality of writing

Very high level of grammar, punctuation and spelling.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by skatealexia 11/03/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Variation and Inheritance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Biology Case Study

    4 star(s)

    designed to assess how well the drug actually works and safety of the drug. Drugs tend to fail more often when in phase 2. This Phase of the clinical trial also sees the use of a placebo. Some patients will receive the drug while others will receive a placebo.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Evolution, what, and any evidence is there?

    4 star(s)

    Historical contingency means explanations at different levels may exist. Gradualism does not mean constant rate of change. The idea that speciation occurs after populations are reproductively isolated has been much debated. In plants, polyploidy must be included in any view of speciation. Formulations such as 'evolution consists primarily of changes in the frequencies of alleles between one generation and another' were proposed rather later.

  1. Marked by a teacher


    4 star(s)

    an organism's body is broken into fragments, then each fragment can then develop into a new individual. Using these methods avoids the need to find a mate and also rapidly increases the number of organisms in a population, all of which are advantages of asexual reproduction.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Research in Genetic Engineering Should Be Halted. Discuss

    3 star(s)

    Genetic engineering represents the ultimate tool. It extends humanity's reach over the forces of nature as no other technology in history... With genetic technology we assume control over the hereditary blueprints of life itself. Can any reasonable person believe for a moment that such unprecedented power is without great risk?

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Cloning. Should it be banned? I will explain all the different types of cloning ...

    Dolly took 277 failed attempts before it was successful, which took a lot of time and money. An unsuccessful clone is when you take the nucleus and change the DNA, but it does not work and nothing is produced. A human body is much more complex than an animal, so

  2. The causes and consequences of variation

    These chance mutations that occur can be beneficial for certain species. For example a chance mutation in some bacteria makes them resistance to anti-biotics. The selection pressure favouring resistance types causes the non-resistance types to die. Therefore only the resistance types survive and pass on their genes to their off spring by the process of natural selection.

  1. Is cloning the way of the future

    There are many debates going for and against cloning, which out weights the pros and cons of cloning, some of which are: Pros * Cloning will improve the overall quality of science and life. * Cloning might produce a greater understanding of the causes of miscarriages.

  2. Human cloning is most notably one of the most controversial issues in medical science.

    (Bender, 1998, 6-7). The basic cloning techniques and procedures have not changed that much since the cloning of Dolly. First, doctors harvest the eggs from female donors who have taken fertility drugs. They then take out the DNA bearing nuclei with a needle on a petri dish, leaving the egg with no nucleus.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work