• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Great Revolt (Indian Mutiny) of 1857 came as a surprise to the British, but not to the Indians and it altered forever the relationship between the two. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐QUESTION: ?The Great Revolt (Indian Mutiny) of 1857 came as a surprise to the British, but not to the Indians and it altered forever the relationship between the two?. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Causes and consequences EFFECT ON RELATIONSHIP Though classified under many names, The Mutiny of 1857 had distinct causes, which could not be altered. It was a rebellion by the sepoys as well as the general public in a ?First War towards Independence?. The revolt did not take place overnight but had mustered over many years of suffering and injustice towards the Indian population by the British. For the British, such a grand scale mutiny must have come as a surprise, but to say that some form of an uprising wasn?t anticipated would be wrong. The revolt greatly altered the relationship between the two communities and was a prominent lead up to the rise in nationalism in India. The Revolt began as unrest among the sepoys. ?A proclamation issued at Delhi indicates the immediate cause: ?It is well known that in these days all the English have entertained these evil designs- first, to destroy the religion of the whole Hindustani Army and then to make the people by compulsion Christians?? [Bipan Chandra]. There was increasing discrimination in the army as the English started to acclaim a more superior status. ...read more.

Middle

This angered the intellects who left betrayed. Orthodox Hindus and Muslims also believed that the British were imposing on their religion and culture. This can be seen with the ban of the Sati practice in 1829. Christian missionaries were allowed to spread their ideas on religion, which the Indians suspected was British funded. Furthermore, provinces like ?Oudh were such rich and historic parts of India that their seizures were seen as a cultural insult.? The nobles too suffered from the British rule. They lost all their power and wealth leaving them impoverished and insulted. Moreover, as most people today, the thought of foreign rule was insulting to the locals. They didn?t want to be humiliated by the British whose arrogance was increasing day by day. Additionally, the relentless exploitation of goods by the British unsettled the tribal men. Taxes were imposed upon them and Christian missionaries were sent in an attempt to ?civilize? them. Economic exploitation in the form of moneylenders and middlemen too came about, which further reduced their independence. Land was also restricted in forests, which led to major problems as they relied on shifting cultivation. Thus, it can be seen that it was not one cause but many factors scattered throughout India that led to the Mutiny Of 1857. As seen above, there were a variety of factors spread over the years that led up to the mutiny. ...read more.

Conclusion

The British had an unfair advantage and so the legislative was mostly foreign run. Economically, things had also worsened. The taxation system was revamped and income tax was imposed. The situation of the Indians aggravated and sadly for the British, their relationship with them in addition deteriorated. There was a decline in the court culture as there was a loss of patronage. This meant that courtesans and musicians found their livelihoods destroyed. Unemployment was steeped and the memories of the mughal culture were being erased. The Revolt of 1857 was a great mark on the history of India where bravery, independence and determination was at show. ??Theirs was a rationality derived both from feudal pre-capitalist ethos and? emerging capitalism under colonialism.? It can be classified as a turning point in the Indian society where a phase of realisation was emerging. As said in the quote, the Great Mutiny was of no surprise to the Indians, however, it was also of no surprise to the British. The hostilities had been simmering over for many preceding years and the revolt was inevitable. Though it turned out to be unsuccessful, it clearly defined a new phase in the British-Indian relationship. The prejudicial actions of the British were irrational and insensitive to the sore Indian sentiments. Not only did they make things worse but they also gave new reason to the Indians to continue their struggle for independence on a grander scale. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate History section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Discuss the short and long term consequences of the Indian Mutiny 1857

    The recruiting therefore moved to the areas of the Sikh Punjab and the Muslim North-West, where people were a lot more loyal to the British crown. One of the reasons for the start of the mutiny was the fact that Hindus had to use grease from cows which is the most sacred animal in the Hindu religion.

  2. Johnson's Great Society. The two main social reforms that The Great Society tackled were ...

    JOHNSON AND HIS ADVISORS AGREED THAT THE BEST WAY TO UNDERTAKE THE ISSUE WAS NOT RAISE PAY BUT TO PROVIDE EDUCATION, JOB TRAINING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. Many of the programs and policies that Johnson enacted to fight poverty still exist today.

  1. A turning point in Chinas history. To what extent do you agree with this ...

    To this extent, the Boxer Rebellion was a failure in its aftermath, although successful in its unification. During the 1890's, the Chinese people felt that foreigners not only had brought commercial and territorial demands but also had corroded the Chinese culture.

  2. To what extent were the British culpable for the sinking of the Lusitania on ...

    Historian Colin Simpson blamed the entire plot on Winston Churchill, First Lord of the Admiralty. From the start of the war, Churchill ordered that all British merchant ships be armed, thus provoking increased aggression from Germany by breaking the Cruiser Rules12.

  1. Notes on the History and Development of the Arab-Israeli Conflict

    Israel continued to build settlements in the occupied areas for many Russian Jew, whose numbers in Israel had greatly increased with the collapse of the SU. - By 1988 the number of settlements on the WB and GS had grown to 120, with 55% of the WB confiscated and 30% of Gaza confiscated.

  2. Outline the reasons for the rise of Chinese Nationalism after 1919. Discuss the impact ...

    The 6 year old emperor abdicated, and the Chinese Republic was founded. With its first president Sun Yat-Sen and his party, the Guomindang (GMD, KMD, National People?s Party) China had a real opportunity for a proper democracy. However, the chance was denied and the republic was condemned to years of

  1. "The Worst Human Right Abuses occur in LEDCs". To what extent do you agree ...

    The Tutsis were tall, thin and were landowners, whereas the Hutus were sturdy and where the ones that worked the land.

  2. The Westeinde is one of the higher parts of The Hague, and the story ...

    There was a legal separation and Catherine left the house in the Westeinde under a settlement by which she was provided with a house at the corner of the Voorhout and the Nieuwstraat and an allowance of Fls. 600 a year, plus the cost of bringing up young Nicolaes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work