• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Gold Metal Heights in High Jump.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

 Hannah Krohn

Gold Metal Heights

Aim: The aim of this task is to consider the winning height for the men’s high jump in the Olympic games.

The graph below gives the Winning height (in centimeters) by the gold medalists at various Olympic games form 1932 to 1980 with the exception of 1940 and 1944.

Constraints to this graph: Since there were no Olympic games in 1940 and 1944 the slope is from 1936 to 1948 is not defined on the same domain as the other data points. This is limiting because the amount of data points vs. time is not consistent throughout the whole graph so it will be more difficult to create an accurate model.

The function that is modeled after the data points and graph is a linear graph seen below:

yimage00.png

The following variables on the next page are the variables that are used in the linear equation. To achieve these numbers plug in the data in the form of linear regression, where the height (y-value) is the dependent variable while the year (x-value) an explanatory value or independent.

...read more.

Middle

Using technology (Microsoft Word>charts) I was able to increase the order until the image01.png

 was extremely close to 1 in value, therefore the goodness of fit is as good as it could be for a model.

This is the model that occurred after trying to find the best fit. This equation had the closest value to r² out of all the order possibilities.

image08.png

image03.png

 0.99099

The lower r2 value for the linear regression indicates that the polynomial regression is a better fit to the data.

Here is the graph that shows that the polynomial better is a better fid for the data then the linear model.

Polynomial Model

Linear Model

image09.png

image10.png

image03.png

 0.99099

image05.png

image04.png

Estimating the winning heights of 1940 and 1944 would be done in the following way:

Look at the Polynomial Model since it has a better goodness of fit.

...read more.

Conclusion

The following table gives height for all the Olympic Games since 1896 to 2008

image16.png

image03.png

 0.97663

Since the original polynomial model changed with the additional data, it did not fit the datat well, but with the new data the r² is less than the original polynomial graph which had a r² of r² image03.png

 0.99099. Still better than the linear graph which had a r² image03.png

image17.png

Here is the data in a table to compare graphs

1st Polynomial Model

2nd Polynomial Model

Linear Model

image18.png

image19.png

image20.png

image21.png

image03.png

 0.99099

image22.png

image23.png

image24.png

image25.png

image03.png

 0.97663

image05.png

image04.png

The trend from 1896 to 2008 is relatively stable slope until 1952 where the slope increases in a (if it was a double derivative) concave down manner until 1996, where it levels off.

Modifications to the data would be to interpolate the data, which is the process one uses to determine a value on the line of best fit within the cluster of scatter plot data.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Maths section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Maths essays

  1. A logistic model

    15 16 17 18 19 20 Year 12 IB Mathematics HL Type II Portfolio: Creating a logistic model International School of Helsingborg - Christian Jorgensen Figure 5.2. Growth factor r=2.9. Graphical plot of the fish population of the hydroelectric project on an interval of 20 years using logistic function model {11}.

  2. High Jump Gold Medal 2012 maths investigation.

    I also decided to use the function to predict the result in 1984 and 2016 1932 - 1984 = 52 years y= 217.9381 + 19.2462 sin (0.054x- 1.758) y= 234.63 cm 1932- 2016 = 84 years y= 217.9381 + 19.2462 sin (0.054x- 1.758)

  1. Creating a logistic model

    59832.60588 1.005021824 19 60133.07467 0.99600776 20 59893.00899 1.00320973 As we have done before, we should also use the GDC to find an estimate for the logistic function: However, the function that the calculator gives is just an estimate, so it is safe for us to round off this function to:

  2. IB Math Methods SL: Internal Assessment on Gold Medal Heights

    However, the linear function itself also is not without its weakness that it keeps linearly increasing and does not decrease its gradient; going up towards positive infinity; meaning that one-day should humans could be able to jump over 100 meters high should the trend be true.

  1. Gold Medal heights IB IA- score 15

    When t = 2016 h (2016) = 19.5 sin {/48 [(2016) ? 1962)]}+215.5 ? 208.0377 ? 208 Therefore, the approximate gold medal height achieved in the year 2016 would be 208 cm. The interpolated data adjusts with the trend of the overall data points.

  2. Modelling Probabilities on games of tennis

    This means that if there is a deuce due to each player having 3 points then the following point will determine the winner of the game. We can represent games as measures of 4 A?s and 4 B in 7 spaces, thus: Number of games possible = = 70 However, some of these games may finish before 7 points.

  1. Mathematic SL IA -Gold medal height (scored 16 out of 20)

    doesn?t have any periodicity and it also doesn?t have fixed maximum and minimum, therefore we cannot investigate the best-fit function model by considering sine and cosine functions. Let? consider Quadratic function; Figure 5 the graph of a quadratic function, y=(x-4)2 The shape of the quadratic function graph is called parabola.

  2. Develop a mathematical model for the placement of line guides on Fishing Rods.

    Therefore we have determined that the quadratic equations given the points {(1,10), (6,96), (8,149)} is . Averaging of the Two Equations The next step in finding our quadratic function is to average out our established a, b, and c values from the two sets data.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work