• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12
13. 13
13
14. 14
14
15. 15
15
16. 16
16
17. 17
17
18. 18
18
19. 19
19

# Analyzing Uniform Circular Motion

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Lab Report: Analysing Uniform Circular Motion

Purpose

In places where the velocity of an object is difficult to find, it is reliable to attain the frequency of an object. This is the most-favourable method used when dealing with circular motion. Frequency, as we know, is indirectly proportional to the period of a motion, or more precisely. We can determine the relationship between a spinning objects mass, the radius of its circular motion (if attached to a thread) and the hanging mass in a circular horizontal motion by applying a formula we already know. The following steps will describe the derivation of a formula which will be beneficial for this experiment;

Newton’s Second Law states: Fnet = msa

However; acceleration of a circular motion is given by;

But

Thus;

Substituting back to Newton’s second law, Fnet= ms (

But since there is a hanging mass which is hanging down from the thread; the tension in the thread is equal to the weight of the hanging mass. And the only force applied during the motion is by the tension in the thread, thus T = Fnet and T = mhg; therefore Fnet = mhg. Putting it back in the original formula we get;

mhg = ms (

where; mh= the mass of the hanging object

ms= the mass of the spinning object

r = the length of the radius of the horizontal motion.

To measure the relationship between frequency and Isolate for the three independent variables; we must isolate for each variable. Isolating for the three manipulating variables in the y = mx + b form we get:

;                                  Where

;                               Where

;                        Where

These are the manipulated equations which will be utilised throughout the lab report.

Materials and Procedure

• Refer back to the Lab Sheet provided by the instructor.

Variables

Middle

0.013

9.49

0.949

9.64

0.964

0.027

8.63

0.863

8.98

0.898

0.038

7.89

0.789

7.61

0.761

0.051

6.31

0.631

6.23

0.623

0.065

5.91

0.591

6.11

0.611

(Note: The formula expressed has previously been derived such that F is equivalent to the Weight of the hanging mass. Thus, it is beneficial to create a graph between Mh rather than F itself which compiles of Mh times the accepted value of acceleration due to gravity, only indirectly describing the relation between Mh and f.)

Controlled Variables:

 Spinning mass = 0.01356 ± 0.00001 kg Radius = 0.53 +/- 0.0005 m

(Note: The uncertainty on each of the Period is an estimated guess. An electronic stopwatch was used which has a precision of uptil 0.01 s. Assuming that the reaction time was perfect, we get a manufacturer’s uncertainty of 0.01 s. However, the idea of reaction time will be explained later on in the Section of Evaluation).

The most important qualitative observation recorded was the idea of the radius of the circular movement, not being the length of the string. Due to disequilibrium of the force exerted for the motion to occur, the actual radius would form a Pythagorean relationship with the length of the string as the length becomes the hypotenuse and this relationship will be explained later on in the Evaluation section.

Manipulated Data

The Manipulated Data section (not to be confused with previous manipulating radius and mass etc) will include all the data calculated with respect to the data collected from the actual experiment. Here it will be convenient to use the converted raw data for legitimate results. A data table for frequency and frequency2 will be shown with respect to the independent variables.

Data Table #4: Frequency for Manipulating Radius

(Remember;  , and the uncertainty for T propagates for the uncertainty of f as shown later on in the calculations)

 Radius (±0.0005m) Frequency (Hz) Uncertainty (±) 0.53 1.22 0.001 1.25 0.002 0.47 1.26 0.002 1.29 0.002 0.4 1.47 0.002 1.42 0.002 0.37 1.53 0.002 1.55 0.002 0.28 1.71 0.003 1.71 0.003

Sample Calculation for frequency (uncertainty)

T1 = 0.819 s (+/- 0.001s)

(Convert to relative uncertainty)

Data table # 5: Frequency2 for (1/r) [with respect to the formula attained]

 1/r ± 0.002 m^-1 Frequency ^2 (Hz^2) Uncertainty (±) 1.8 1.4884 0.004 1.5625 0.004 2.1 1.5876 0.004 1.6641 0.004 2.5 2.1609 0.006 2.0164 0.006 2.7 2.3409 0.007 2.4025 0.007 3.6 2.9241 0.010 2.9241 0.010

Sample Calculation for (1/R):

=

=         Relative Uncertainty

=        Absolute Uncertainty

Sample Calculation for f2:

Radius: 0.53m; Frequency: 1.22  0.001 Hz

F2 = 2

F2 =         Relative Error

F2 =         Absolute Error

This process was followed to attain the correct uncertainty and the actual value for each of the values represented in the data above. For the following tables, which require the reciprocal of the original independent value, the same method was use (for e.g. 1/ms) and the same method was applied to figure out the f2 value.

Data Table # 6: Frequency for Manipulating Spinning Mass (ms)

 Spinning Mass (±0.00001 kg) Frequency (Hz) Uncertainty (±) 0.014 2.30 0.005 2.11 0.004 0.020 1.81 0.003 1.88 0.004 0.028 1.61 0.003 1.63 0.003 0.034 1.53 0.002 1.49 0.002 0.040 1.42 0.002 1.44 0.002

Data Table # 7: Frequency2 for Manipulating (1/ms)

 1/m (± 0.03 kg^-1) Frequency^2  (Hz^2) Uncertainty (±) 73.35143 5.28 0.024 4.43 0.019 49.37296 3.27 0.012 3.55 0.013 36.00360 2.59 0.008 2.65 0.009 29.72122 2.34 0.007 2.21 0.007 25.04947 2.01 0.006 2.08 0.006

This equation was derived from the previous equation provided, and helps us determine the relationship between Ms and frequency in a linear manner. A further graphical explanation will be provided in the Graphical Analysis part.

Data Table # 8: Frequency for Manipulating Hanging Mass (Mh)

 Hanging Mass (+/-0.00001kg) Frequency (Hz) Uncertainty (±) 0.013 1.05 0.0011 1.04 0.0011 0.027 1.16 0.0013 1.11 0.0012 0.038 1.27 0.0016 1.31 0.0017 0.051 1.58 0.0025 1.61 0.0026 0.065 1.69 0.0029 1.64 0.0027

Conclusion

Some non-major sources of error could be those such as air resistance. Although, not much air was there, but the air molecules do interfere with the radius going down at an angle, and more human force being required for the system compared to the force originally caused by the Hanging mass.

These errors lead to a systematic error, and the y-intercepts in each manipulated equation reflects that. The experiment could be made better in a sense that, more trials are taken for each different sub-experiment. The person revolving can also make sure that they put enough force behind it to overcome the force of resistance. Also a constant speed would be required for more accurate results. The manipulated graphs could have also had a line of best fit, which touched 0 in order to get a more accurate slope, since there were no y intercepts in the original equation. But if the data was accurate, then the line would have automatically touched 0.

All in all, the percent error can be high due to the fact that we deal with quite small numbers. This experiment does consist of some systematic errors which can be improved on.

Instruction # 4

Finding the mass of a rubber stopper

Frequency = 1.22 (+/- 0.001 Hz)

Hanging mass = 0.03237±0.00001 kg

The original spinning mass of the stopper is 0.013 kg.

This means that the error is really low, and that this value is valid.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Physics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related International Baccalaureate Physics essays

1. ## Aim: ...

However the angle was 0�, or 180�, then the trolley would not move or accelerate at all. Gravity would be affecting it due to the force of reaction canceling it out, and the horizontal surface beneath the trolley would prevent the trolley from moving.

2. ## Investigate the factors affecting the period of a double string pendulum

So as the strings get further away from the center of mass of the metal bar, the more tension they have and as they are pulled back at a certain angle (90 degrees in this case) thus they have a higher displacement, higher frequency as more force acts upon the bar (tension ins strings not angle)

1. ## Investigate the Size of Craters in Sand Due to Dropped Object.

But we still encountered with some problem while conducting this investigation. The problems are: 1. Firstly, the scale for meter ruler was not sensitive enough.

2. ## The Affect of Mass on the Time It Takes an Object To Fall

Although there was some error in our data, we did come to the undeniable conclusion that there is some kind of an inverse relationship between mass and time, which proves our hypothesis correct, which was that if the mass increased the time would decrease.

1. ## Suspension Bridges. this extended essay is an investigation to study the variation in tension ...

At the end of the study, the trend between tension in the left segment and point of application of force can be modeled by negative quadratic equations. This goes on to explain that tension increases till the maximum point and then starts decreasing.

2. ## How does the sinkage depth of a tyre affect its rolling resistance ?

Hence as the sinkage depth of the tire increases so does the rolling resistance 9it faces . In order to find the air pressure of the tire propagates the rolling resistance , we have to find the air pressure which has the least rolling resistance value .

1. ## Horizontal Circular Motion Lab

will be recorded for the experiment. Steps 3-5 will be repeated in each trial. Experiment Apparatus Diagram: Data Collection and Processing: Data Table #1 Final Lab Results: Trial Number of Revs. Time Required Radius ±0.1cm 1 10 3.82 52.2 2 10 3.82 52.2 3 10 3.96 52.2 4 10 3.35 52.2 5 10 3.15 52.2 6

2. ## Investigation into the relationship between acceleration and the angle of free fall downhill

There were no error bars for the values of the angles, this is because they are deduced mathematically from other results; if there was an uncertainty, it would be for the height or length measured, not for the calculation of the angle.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to