• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are the WOKS controlled by language?

Extracts from this document...


Are our ways of knowing controlled by language? Are ways of knowing controlled by language? If yes, then language either controls it because all knowledge is communicated in language and there is some form of knowledge that cannot be transmitted so. Or that the structure of language restricts thought, which is part of the process of acquiring knowledge, and therefore knowledge. Language is syntax (used in this manner meaning representation of meaning), while the meaning it conveys is semantics. Communication is first done by encoding meaning in syntax, and then interpreting it again back into meaning. Thus language is the medium of communication. But can everything be expressed in language? If it can, then there would be no loss in the fidelity of information as it gets transmitted from one human to another. There would be no misunderstanding. But if it cannot, then we have a problem with using language as a means of communication. Let's take a simplified analogy of our relation with language. Data formats in computers. In computers, information is represented as data encoded in specific formats. Software must be able to understand the format in order to process it. Therefore there are standards that govern the format in which data is represented. Most of the documents on the web, for example, are encoded in HTML. ...read more.


Well that simply is an idea assuming that language has to be what it always have been. Language changes because its users require it to. The change of language is simply the adaptation of it to the domain of its use. Take waves for example. Not the waves that surfers surf on, or even waves of ripples on water. Not sound waves or even light waves. Let's take quantum probability waves. A very abstract concept, surely. But we can clearly see that we have named it a wave because it has similar properties to the normal waves we see and experience. But of course quantum probability waves don't mean water waves. The word has been adapted for a new concept in physics. But how can normal words be adapted for such abstract concepts anyway? Aren't there any abstract concepts that simply cannot be expressed in language? The answer is simply, no. This is due to how the mind works, and thus also the nature of language. The mind has certain "built-in" concepts, which then can be extended in a combinatorial fashion to arrive at all possible concepts, and certainly the concepts we have now. Take the concept of the wave for example. It is made possible thanks to little concepts of space and time that we so often take for granted. ...read more.


Does the professional authority speak in the same way as the person seeking opinion or advice? * What may have been meant by the comment 'How strangely do we diminish a thing as soon as we try to express it in words'? (Maurice Maeterlinck) Language and Culture * If people speak more than one language, is what they know different in each language? Does each language provide a different framework for reality? * How is the meaning of what is said affected by silences and omissions, pace, tone of voice and bodily movement? How might these factors be influenced in turn by the social or cultural context? * What is lost in translation from one language to another? Why? * To what degree might different languages shape in their speakers different concepts of themselves and the world? What are the implications of such differences for knowledge? Linking Questions * In completing the sentence, 'I know that . . .', one is making a knowledge claim. Why is it useful or necessary to express knowledge claims? Are there Areas of Knowledge where it is expected or required? Are there Ways of Knowing where it is not? * To what extent is it possible to overcome ambiguity and vagueness in language? In what contexts might ambiguity either impede knowledge or contribute to it? Does the balance between precision and ambiguity alter from one discipline to another? Vidoes Tom and jerry Some other language ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Does Language Determine or Limit Thought?

    The amount of fluency a person has should not limit their thought. To test the Sapir-Whorf theory, I tried it on my parents. We speak our native language Urdu at home as well as English. When asking my mother, what should friends do to each other?

  2. "All of the other ways of knowing are controlled by language." What does this ...

    He cried", would he get the idea of the cause and effect of pain there? Or has language controlled all other ways of knowing, and therefore limited the knowledge gained? Now as for emotion and perception and reason, it can be clearly seen that without language none of these ways of knowing can be clearly expressed.

  1. What power does language have

    Forcing women to cover in order to prevent attention from men in the western world is seen as unethical. From the viewpoint of someone in Saudi Arabia, one could argue that he doesn't want to share his wives beauty with other men, thus making her his possession.

  2. Does language determine or limit thought?

    to communicate it to others but also in my knowledge of it. This means that the words one possesses decides what he or she can know. There is a published study done by Peter Gordon, a psychologist at Columbia University in August of 2004 on the language of a tribe

  1. To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language? ...

    in languages have so many different meanings to it which makes it confusing, for example: the word 'light' it has two different meaning but it is spelled the same way. The word 'light' means something being not heavy 'the feather is very light' and it also means light from the

  2. How does the capacity to communicate personal experiences and thoughts through language affect knowledge? ...

    In the first phrase "set" means to harden or solidify, where as in the second "set" means to arrange into groups. The question also arises: What do you mean by "set"? In order to combat this fallacy, one must be careful to select specific words that describe something specifically, and not one with different meanings whenever possible.

  1. Is it possible to think without language? How does language facilitate, extend, direct or ...

    Think of Helen Keller. She was born deaf and blind and still got her Bachelor degree in arts. Her thoughts were not images, sounds or some special kind of language ? at least not until she started reading braille ? but she still thought in some way.

  2. To what extent is language necessary for thought?

    However, not only words and labels themselves have an influence on our minds but the way they are said can have an influence of how we identify people. Once one learns language, it is difficult to think complex or abstract thoughts without somehow relating to language.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work