• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Deconstructive Essay - Creationism Should not be Taught in School Science Classes as an Alternative to Evolution.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Creationism Should not be Taught in School Science Classes as an Alternative to Evolution. My view is that creationism is not a science, it is a belief. Because it is a belief it has no place being taught as a science, and hence does not belong in a science classroom.[1] I will not only show that creationism is wrong, but also that evolution is the only reasonable explanation for the development of life.[2] There is no physical or scientific evidence that supports the beliefs of creationism, while there is a vast amount of evidence from a wide range of sciences that together point to the evolution over time of life on Earth.[3] The many disciplines of science that have contributed to the formulation of the theory of evolution include geology, botany, chemistry, taxonomy, molecular biology, genetics, palaeontology, nuclear physics and biochemistry to name a few. These have contributed thousands of articles in peer-reviewed journals to painstakingly describe how the forces of natural selection have shaped the character and nature ...read more.


For example, if the remains of a fossilised human were to be found in the same rock layer as a fossilised dinosaur, with no obvious distortion of the surrounding rock, then that would count as evidence against evolution, which clearly states the humans did not exist at the time of dinosaurs. Or if any one of the many dating techniques that scientists employ were to consistently give the same age for organisms that were supposed separated by millions of years, then this would count against evolution. Creationism allows for no such procedure. Faced with countless examples of evidence supporting an old earth, or of the gradual evolution of animals as shown in the fossil record, or with molecular studies showing how evolution occurs at a genetic level, they simple refuse to accept the evidence. [9] Not only this, but creationists assume that if they cast doubt on evolution that they must be right by default. ...read more.


Nor does it mirror the scientific process in any way. As such, the notion that it be given equal time in a ?science? focused educational environment (or, indeed, any educational environment) is simply ludicrous[18]. It should not be taught period. Creationism is an affront against both science and religion.[19] ________________ [1] Stating my position. [2] Direct argument [3] Main reason for why I have this view [4] Supporting evidence for my position [5] Other resons for my posiiton [6] Burden of Proof on my opponents [7] Main belief of my opponents [8] Main reson they are wrong [9] Other reasons why they are wrong [10] Demonstrates the problem of a direct attack in this context [11] Ridicule of my opponent?s view [12] Attributing the non rational argument of ?invincible ignorance? to my opponents [13] Demonstrating that my opponents argument is not related to the point at issue. [14] Rhetorical question [15] Black & White fallacy [16] Emotive language [17] Circular argument. [18] Ridicule [19] Emotive language ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Tok essay- context is all

    Another criticism of coherence is that it cannot exclude crazy beliefs, which do not cohere with the population at large. With a little imagination it is easy to twist the truth by sticking to an initial belief which is false.

  2. tok essay 6

    Although when tried to be proven, new axioms were formed which opened new views on logical possibility. While in history breaks in accepted conventions can occur during reinterpretations. Numerous historians in the past might have made a biased interpretation of past event.

  1. Tok Essay - Question 5 2010

    When calculating the trajectory of, for example, a bullet, Newtonian mechanics remains useful, because the difference caused by relativity will be so small as to be immeasurable. A more humble, every day example of the continued relevance of an outdated paradigm regards the shape of the Earth.

  2. TOK Journals

    the patterns we discover over time to predict the future, with, of course, not guarantees about the accuracy and precision at best. What do we "know" about the world by the process of induction? Technically, we do not "know" anything about the world by the process of induction, not to

  1. The Provisional Nature of Science

    In my opinion, science can be compared to a puzzle. Today, scientists meander all over different subjects and try to link the missing puzzle pieces; however, once a scientist connects a puzzle to the whole picture, and it is perceived to be the correct placement, then more and more questions arise.

  2. TOK Essay 3

    was thought to be wrong he would not comprehend how to manage. Our world is constantly evolving and making changes to things we already know or thought we knew. Therefore as the question asks, doubt can be the key to knowledge but there must be a balance between doubt and

  1. As an IB student, how has your learning of history and science ...

    women behave differently but men share similar characteristics with other men, while women with other women. Darwin?s theory of natural selection claims that every individual tries to impress the individual of its opposite sex, universally, and that animals and birds too prefer to reside in flocks.

  2. As an IB student, how has your learning of literature and science contributed to ...

    Reading the autobiography of Hitler we can understand his ideology and his role as a Fuhrer in the Nazi society. We can understand the reasons that urged the Germans to worship him. By reading the book, Schindler?s List we can feel the horrors and uncertainties of life of the Jews that were incarcerated in the concentration camps.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work