What is it about theories in human sciences and natural science that makes them convincing?

Authors Avatar by avinash166 (student)

What is it about theories in human sciences and natural science that makes them convincing?

Natural  science’s collectively study of the physical world and their characteristics, form and function with a strong support of logical reasoning whereas Human sciences deal with social aspects of human settlement, human behavior and various variables that govern and effect the functioning of society and social factors with the strong support of empirical experiences. Natural and the human sciences consists of many theories but not all of them are true but with the advancement in science mostly all these theories are being replaced by the science community with the new ones as they are more detailed and precise than the previous one. For instance, how the Newton’s laws are being taken over by Einstein’s and there are some theories that are built on previous theories thus there is already a gamut of empirical evidence. How far are the theories that govern human sciences and natural sciences objective and self supportive? Theories are generally a collection of ideas which are systematically put together in order to explain a fact or phenomena I strongly believe that while taking into consideration the theories of sciences-human and natural-the first and the foremost factor to be concerned is relevance with respect to time and place.

But here the question is what makes these theory convincing.  The fact that our attitude/perspective to take and accept any theory without analyzing or questioning is what makes it more appealing. Knowledge is favorably dispersed among certain classes. The upper middle class and the elite are the bastions of knowledge, art, culture and expert knowledge. The class that exists at the extreme end and is the receiving class is the lower, working class. So, knowledge distinction between the known group of scientist and unknown group of common layman is vast. –The creating end is taken for granted and the receiving end just grasps anything that is given to us because our stereotypical mind which believes that anyone who speaks professionally know what they are doing and have a better idea or knowledge about their proposed theory and are probably correct .

Join now!

Since my childhood no one has ever thought me to reason out the scientific theories or question it all. All I was told that this theory is right and you would have to learn it whether you like it or not because it is proven by a scientist with higher education qualifications and of experience. Our mind is convinced that the theory proposed is correct. But all this changed when I joined the IB where I was encouraged to ask question. Like for instance a child always relies on teachings that are thought by the teacher without testing the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay