• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast two of the five main approaches in psychology.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and Contrast two of the five main approaches in psychology Written By Mark Costa The two approaches I will be looking at in this essay are 'behavourism' and 'humanism'. Apart from the fact that one of them is scientific and the other is not, I have chosen these two as they have very different aspects of studying and interperatation that interests me. Psychology evolved through three subjects philosophy, biology and physics. It developed through stages and views, firstly with Psychoanalysis, behaviarism, cognitive, humanistic and lastly biological. Behaviourists believed that we are shaped by the way our behaviours are rewarded. Behaviourists want results, by which they can check measure and observe on the stimulus and the reacted response. Humanists believe that every human being in the world is unique and also that there will never be any two people whom are identical. This relates to the belief on genetics and the experiences we go through in life are different from each other. Through 'ethics' there is a rule that no mental or physical harm should come to a participant of an experiment carried out on a psychological basis. Although in Behaviourism it is believed that animals are practically and ethically more convenient to test. ...read more.

Middle

This process is when a stimulus which brings about no response in a human or animal, until it is associated with another. Pavlov carried out an experiment on a dog to prove this theory. A contraption was made through which he could measure the amount of saliva this dog produced. A bell was rung and there was no significant change in the amount of saliva that was produced. Pavlov slowly began to stimulate the dog with dog food for it to smell, each ringing the bell. Pavlov began to notice that if he rang the bell yet showed no food, the dog would begin to produce siliva in anticipation of it. John Watson realised the potential of this idea, and started the behaviourist movement in 1913, when he wrote an article called, 'Psychology as the behaviourist views it'. This was followed by behaviourists; John Watson, Edward Thorndike and Beirs Frederick Skinner, carried on with Pavlov's theory of 'classical conditioning' forming their own theories on all aspects of human learning. The Humanism movement developed in the America in the early 1960's, where it was believed that it would replace the two other main approaches in psychology at the time; behaviourism and psychoanalysis. ...read more.

Conclusion

Behaviourists have done a lot for psychology in the mainstream by, creating experimental methodologies, which have been very effective to the topic over all. Strengths of humanism are that, it helped people to realise, that it is important to study the human mind and the experiences that people go through. It helped, to stop other approaches becoming too extreme in ideas that were incorrect, and by emphasising that it is important for people to realise who they are, through, self-actualisation'. However ethnologists believe that the use of animals in their experiments only achieved 'artificial learning'. Cognitive psychologists believe that behaviourism, ignores important mental process in learning, hence their results could not achieve accuracy or correct, and humanists disliked their rejection of the experiences humans went through. Whereas, the weak points to humanism are merely based on the way, humanists base their approach. The reasons being they choose to take a less scientific approach, hence they do not have a large impact on the mainstream of psychology. Although these two approaches in psychology have a great effect on the subject, they have weak points but together the five main approaches help us complete an idea of how to perceive people in general. Through comparing both scientific and non-scientific you can use the strengths of both views in order to complete and overall perception of psychology. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Zoology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Zoology essays

  1. Investigating the effect that group size has on the vigilant behaviour of flocks of ...

    Finally the best predictor variable table (table 4) show that all of the predictor variables explain only 17.4% of the variance in the log of the look, as opposed to just the best predictor variable, log of the group size, explaining 15.9% of the variance.

  2. Why do we strive to achieve?

    I believe everyone would make similar choices. That is not to say that the rat should be mistreated and harmed in a cruel manner. There is an ethical way to go about everything. There is great deal that can be learned from animal testing and we would be foolish not to take advantage of it.

  1. Using the Grounded Theory to explore people's views on animal use: What factors influence ...

    consider their views on animal use and is the basis for all the other categories as they all link in some way. The participant's background knowledge of animal use is a category that has emerged from the data set and seems to be an influencing factor on people's views toward animal use.

  2. Are non-human animals conscious?

    However, what has been overlooked is the possibility that Clever Hans was consciously thinking something simple but directly relevant to his situation - perhaps something like: "I must tap my foot when that man nods his head." Marian Dawkins identifies two other sorts of error that can be made when studying animal behaviour (in addition to the Clever Hans effect).

  1. This study attempts to explore the basis of people's fear of animals.

    There was also a significant difference on perceived fear as related to gender, with women being notably more fearful of ten animals. Previous Research and Studies Bennett-Levy and Marteau perceive their results to be supportive of Seligman's "biological preparedness". It could also be interpreted so as to supporting the Social

  2. Show How Principles, Ideals and even Facts Are Corrupted By Powerful individuals to suit ...

    Now, as well as not being able to continue arguing, the animals will also have the new sense of gratification towards the pigs for their protection, thus making them less likely to argue in the future. Squealer is extremely clever, and so can exploit any of the animals' weaknesses.

  1. "Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Ecologism as a new ethic."

    It implies respect for his fellow members and also respect for the community as such, for animals and plants have as much right as humans to live satisfying lives. All living creatures and the ecosystems that support them, it is advocated, are not instrumentally but intrinsically valuable.

  2. How have Human Beings evolved to their current position in the world

    to different degrees, is the primary influence on the evolution of melanism in the peppered moth." However, Majerus found that Kettlewell's research was flawed as when testing how likely the moths were to be eaten; he placed the moths on tree trunks, a place where they would rarely rest in nature.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work