• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does varying bacterial amylase effect inhibition by copper?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

INVESTIGATION How does varying bacterial amylase effect inhibition by copper? Amylases are enzymes, which hydrolyse starch into maltose. There are two main types of amylase: - 1) Alpha amylase, which degrade starch molecules into fragments 10 glucose residues long; 2) And there are Beta amylases, which break down into maltose made of two glucose molecules. Both are working by hydrolysis adding one molecule of water across the glycosidic link. Hypothesis I think that the higher the concentration of bacterial amylase, the faster the rate of reaction. This is because the higher the concentration the faster the rate of reaction. Increased concentration results in an increased possibility that collisions between molecules with the required activation energy will occur. Copper is non-competitive inhibitor. In non-competitive inhibition, the inhibitor may form a complex with the enzyme itself, with the enzyme/substrate complex or with the prosthetic group. The inhibitor is not competing for the active site but joins to the enzyme molecules elsewhere. Bacteria use amylase to feed and therefore provide energy to the cell. Bacteria are prokaryotes. Prokaryotes are made up of prokaryote calls. They do not have a membrane-bound nucleus. The genetic material is in a single strand coiled in the centre to form a nucleiod. They are also single celled organisms. We cannot live without bacteria, yet bacteria causes may diseases, which kill many people, for example TB, typhoid, cholera, and many more. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore I am doing another preliminary test with lower concentration of iodine solution. I will use 2ml of 0.25% bacterial amylase, 2ml of 2% starch and 0.1% iodine. I will not add copper sulphate solution and the temperature will be at room temperature. % Of iodine solution Start time in secs Finish time in secs 0.1% 0 347 This shows that the experiment works but the experiment takes too long so I will repeat the experiment at different temperatures. The temperature range I will use will be from room temperature, 20 to 80°C. To do this I will need to set up water baths at different temperature. Temperature in °C Start time in secs Finish time in secs Time taken in secs 20 0 353 353 30 9 281 272 40 15 268 253 50 22 260 238 60 30 317 287 70 37 477 440 80 45 No reaction N/A This shows the optimum temperature for the reaction. The optimum temperature is in between 40 and 50°C so I will use 45°C. Therefore I will do the preliminary experiment I planned to do to find out the concentration of copper sulphate solution to use. % Of copper sulphate solution Start time in secs Finish time in secs Time taken 1% 0 579 579 2% 8 1063 1055 3% 15 1457 1442 4% 20 N/A N/A 5% 26 N/A N/A No copper sulphate added 32 269 237 This shows the results for the preliminary experiment to find out the concentration of copper sulphate solution to use. ...read more.

Conclusion

This changes the shape of the enzyme and as a result, reduces the rate of the reaction. As the concentration is increased, there are more enzymes in the solution than there are inhibitors. This means that more of enzymes are involved in the reaction, therefore the rate of reaction increases. This indicates that my hypothesis 'I think that the higher the concentration of bacterial amylase, the faster the rate of reaction.' was correct. EVALUATION The main problem of my experiment was to determine the end point of the experiment was. The colour change from the blue/black to colourless was difficult to determine. Attaining the correct concentration of bacterial amylase was the difficulty I encountered whilst conducting the experiment. In order to attain the correct concentration, I had to dilute the bacteria amylase using distilled water. Overall, I believe that the experiment was accurate and that I acquired accurate results. I repeated the experiment three times in order to achieve accurate results and also rule out the possibility of 'fluke' or chance results. The experiment produced no anomalies. The results provided evidence that supported my hypothesis. I was able to accept my hypothesis to be correct and conclude that the rate of reaction increases with increasing concentration of bacterial amylase. To broaden my investigation for example, I could: a) Change the temperature; b) Change the ph; c) Alter the concentration of substrate/ inhibitor; d) Use different types of enzymes. There are many variables that could be altered in order to broaden my investigation and take it into another level. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Microbiology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Microbiology essays

  1. An investigation to show the effects of temperature on the rate of diffusion

    Next take a test tube and pour the contents of the measured distilled water into the test tube. Using forceps place test tube into water bath 25o. Repeat this part of the experiment three times in order to get an average reading.

  2. Buffer solution making and investigation.

    the sodium ethanoate had a pH value of 5.2 +-0.1 as the pH meter tended to flicker between 5.1 and 5.3, and the buffer solution made from the ammonia and the ammonium chloride had a pH of 9.0+-0.1 as once more the pH meter tended to flicker between 8.9 and 9.1.

  1. Introduction to Spectrophotometric Analysis - By using spectrophotometric analysis or spectrophotometry, one can determine ...

    Some amino acids which are having aromatic side chains especially tyrosine and tryptophan absorb most of the light in the UV region where the wavelength is lower than 300nm (Gore, 2000). From the protein spectrum obtained above, the wavelength of absorption is at 229nm and 279nm, both are lower than

  2. Observe the effect of temperature on activity of the enzyme amylase.

    * The tubes were then mixed thoroughly and heat in boiling water for 2 minutes, at which point the tubes developed a red colour. * The tubes were then removed and allowed to cool to room temperature. * Using distilled water as a reference and a 430 filter the colorimeter

  1. Distinguishing Species of Bacteria

    However Proteus vulgaris only showed it for glucose, while E.coli showed it for all three of the carbohydrates. Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed no fermentation. In table 3, the only bacteria which showed a production of indole was Escherichia coli. This is because E.

  2. Effect Of An Inhibitor Such As Copper Sulphate On The Activity Of Catalase

    and substrate (S) form an enzyme substrate complex (ES). The substrate is either broken down on mended to form product (Pr). E + S ---------> ES -----------> Pr + E <--------- <---------- The activities of all enzymes are affected by: temperature, pH level, substrate concentration, enzyme concentration and inhibitors.

  1. Measure cellular respiration in living and dormant pea seeds at two different temperatures.

    The experiment would have four respirometers with equal volumes of peas that have been germinating for 0, 24, 48, and 72 hours. The control group would have a respirometer with beads only. It would be predicted that the seeds that have been germinating for longer hours would have higher rates of respiration.

  2. The aim of this investigation is to make a series of dilutions using the ...

    Thus the standard deviation for the dilution (100µl sample) neat (undiluted) is 0.022. Table of Standard Deviation for the 100µl Sample: Here Table 6 shows the standard deviation for the 100µl diluted sample. Dilution (100µl sample): Standard Deviation: Neat (undiluted) 0.025 1:2 0.067 1:5 0.021 1:10 0.066 1:20 0.641 1:100 0.138 Table 6 Table of Standard Deviation for the 100µl (Reverse Pipetting)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work