• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Animals Have the same Rights as us?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Animal Rights an insight for the Future Should animals have the same rights as us? A complex and largely controversial issue, it has been debated for many a year in the past but what does it mean? What impacts would it have upon us and our environment? The idea behind the belief of animal rights is that since they are living breathing organisms they should be given rights that equate more or less to that of human. They should be given freedom of movement and not be exploited in ways just as farming for food. Research has been undertaken in animals such as chimpanzees that are allegedly more human like than we first thought. If an animal is able to make its own choices for itself such as say the choice to hunt, or as seen in chimp behavior interact with each other, then surely their position should be reconsidered. Shouldn't it? On the 10th of December 1948 the United Nations met to draw up the constitution of human rights known as The Univeral Declaration of Human Rights. It hoped to guarantee a just and pleasant livelihood for all human including things such as 'Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.' This means simply that humans are subject to freedom within their life and security or safety within their society. ...read more.

Middle

This often leads to packing more animals into a smaller space thus reducing expenditure. For instance (as described in www.spt) 'farmers who raise chickens are inclined to put them in small `battery' cages. They are commonly kept `eight to ten to a space smaller than a newspaper page. Unable to walk around or even stretch their wings much less build a nest the birds become vicious and attack one another' This is but a small example of the pain and suffering that can be endured by some animals during farming and it is for this reason that unless slaughtering was done a hundred per cent humanely it would not be right to exploit animals for food if they were given rights. Our present treatment of animals is morally indefensible since factory farming causes livestock pain and to use other techniques such as free range, which I would like to add our considerably more expensive, is just not going to happen any time soon. Many of us are equally unfamiliar with the many experiments that are conducted in animals daily. This is often vivisection which is experimenting on live animals to record their effects etc. Many of these are in the name of important drugs which could have life changing effects on us but some are not. ...read more.

Conclusion

The animal-rights view rejects the concept that animals are merely goods or property intended for the benefit of humans. The theory doesn't assume that animals and humans are completely equal and this is shown in things such as voting which requires a great deal of moral thinking and a knowledge of human political systems. The fundamental principle behind Animal Rights is that non human animals deserve to live free form harm, abuse and exploitation from humans. This means more than just treating animals well before they are exploited it means that animals have a right to be free from this exploitation as well as cruelty just as animals. Sir Aurobindo (faqfile.html) a poet and philosopher once said 'Life is life--whether in a cat, or dog or man. There is no difference there between a cat or a man. The idea of difference is a human conception for man's own advantage...' He is saying that it is a human idea that we are in some way inferior to other animals because we have the gift of greater intelligence but this does not mean that we have the right to exert our will upon other animals and treat them cruelly or exploit them. At the end of the day we are not so different and it is human blindness that causes us to wrong animals. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Zoology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Zoology essays

  1. 'Why if at all should we treat animals equally with humans?'

    When I opposed this idea to a group of friends, one said, 'If my mum was dying of cancer and it could be cured, by testing it on a dog, it would be worthwhile, however if it was another lipstick for L'Oreal I would think it was wrong.'

  2. Animal Testing

    Studies are under way in trying to develop alternative methods of testing but they are still not developed enough. Most of the scientists hope to lessen the use of laboratory animals being used today and apply a minimum number of animals.

  1. Animals in Captivity - Should or Should Not Be Kept.

    access on more than seven days in any consecutive twelve month period. The aim of the act is to ensure that where animals are kept in caged surroundings they are provided with adequate space and are properly provided for. Applications for licensing go through the Environmental Health Department of local authorities.

  2. Free essay

    Animals have no rights- they are created for the benefit of man

    Traditionally the Christian church has championed issues of human rights whilst ignoring those of animals. The majority of Christians are omnivores and there is no stipulation in Christianity for its followers to avoid meat.

  1. Animal Experimenting

    A ban on vivisection would lead to testing on humans, where the costs would be extremely high. Additionally, humans take longer to experience potential side effects because human life expectancy is longer than most animals'. On the other hand, results derived from animal experiments have had a negligible effect on

  2. Is there an important moral difference between human beings and animals

    11 Indeed, the early philosopher Jeremy Bentham set the basis for Singer's argument by declaring: "Each to count for one and none for more than one". 12 Thus, we should not take into account their abilities and everyone should be treated equal.

  1. The arguments below focus upon blood sports, which involve hunting with dogs and include ...

    It may not be possible to reach traps in time to prevent animals injuring themselves trying to escape. Traps are also indiscriminate as to what they catch. Shooting or hunting with hounds ensures a kind of natural selection with the weakest or sickest animals killed while the fittest survive, thus maintaining a healthy population.

  2. Compare and contrast the ways different animals respond to osmotic challenges

    Na+/ K+ ATPase and Na+/K+/2Cl- transporter, resulting in no net movement of water. Freshwater teleosts have body fluids that are more concentrated than their environment, so their chloride cells function differently to those in marine teleosts. Instead of secreting Cl-, they actively absorb ions that are lost across the gills, namely Ca2+ and possibly Cl-.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work