• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

Student number: 0373390

Extracts from this document...


Student number: 0373390 SO2008 Assessed Task Scenario One: A child in Need An important component of the inclusion programme has been the introduction of pre-school education in order to allow children with disabilities and impediments to their learning to develop the skills that will allow them to maximise their chances of future success in the classroom. The benefit of EI on children with DS however, remains inclusive (Wishart, 1996). This in turn highlights the issue of whether it is possible or desirable to integrate children with DS into mainstream education. Within this scenario the research will be assessed to decide whether EI is effective for children with DS and what is the best course of action to follow in the case of the child in question. DS is a chromosomal disorder characterised by the presence of an extra #21 chromosome. Instead of having 46 chromosomes in each of his/her cells, a person with DS has 47. DS is the most prevalent chromosomal disorder, and also the most frequently recognised cause of physical and intellectual impairment (Selikowitz, 1990). What this means is that children with DS develop intellectually at a much slower pace than other children who do not have a learning disability (Selikowitz, 1990). However as with all children their rate of development varies considerably, with some developing more slowly and others at a faster rate. According to Wishart (1993), the 'range of ability levels in DS children at all ages is in fact unusually wide for a learning disability of known aetiology' (Wishart, 1993:391). Such variation can be attributed to both biological and environmental factors, which will have an impact on the level of ability acquired by children with DS (Laws et al., 2000). In the past people with DS were perceived as being sub-human and labelled 'uneducable'. By the 1960's attitudes, treatment and expectations of people with DS had begun to change. ...read more.


These activities have many benefits; the child will develop coordination and strong muscles as well as learning good social skills, communication and becoming more independent from their parents. Most importantly, they are taking their place within their community. For example Pueschel and Hopman (1993) report wide variation in communication skills across a wide age-spread of children with DS. ).++ Development is controlled by the brain. Children with DS have brains that are slightly differently formed from those of other children. This makes the process of learning new skills less efficient (Selikowitz, 1990:45). in Part III of the Children Act 1989 There are also the benefits of being amongst peers whose behaviour is likely to be age appropriate therefore. Integration has been an issue of increasing momentum for children with 'Special Educational needs' including those with Down syndrome (DS). Since the introduction of the Warnock report (1978) government policy has aim to increase the number of children with learning difficulties to be taught in mainstream education. This has had important implications on the nature of early intervention (EI) for children with DS. LINK EI with InterG In fact Connolly, Morgan, Russell, and Fulliton (1993) compared a group of 10 adolescents who had participated in early intervention in Tennessee with 10 age-matched adolescents who had not. They reported that the early intervention subjects had significantly higher scores on measures of cognitive abilities and adaptive behavior than did the comparison subjects. The mean IQ of the early intervention group was 40.1 compared with 30.5 for the comparison group, with IQ ranges of 25-53 versus 17-45, For example Connolly et al (1993) longitudinal study on the effectiveness of EI found that children with DS who had received EI did not show decline typically seen with age in children with DS as supported by Carr (2002). who found anddo not show as much decline in IQ scores as those who had not participated in EI Programme findings which are substaianted (Ludlow and Allen, 1979). ...read more.


Many children with DS do not progress beyond the intellectual capabilities of the average 6-8 year old and a significant number do not achieve even that. Children with DS may be leading healthier and happier lives and benefiting greatly from the growing acceptance of their right to take their place in the community but psychologists have so far made disappointing progress in identifying ways of helping them to compensate for the very real problems they encounter in learning basic childhood skills. When working only with children with DS, it can be all too easy to see only the progress being made and to lose sight of what is not being achieved and indeed may never be achieved. It is therefore especially important in evaluating findings from empirical studies of children with DS to have access to data from concurrent control groups of typically-developing children. Many studies, however, simply evaluate outcomes by comparing them with developmental norms for children without learning disabilities or with other findings in the DS literature. For lots of reasons, even when control groups have been used in empirical studies of development in DS, studies have more often been cross-sectional than longitudinal in design - looking at a group or groups of children across a specific age range but testing each individual child usually only once, or sometimes twice. Many of these have focused on a very limited age range of children and on the 'ifs and whens' of learning rather than on the actual dynamics of development. Averaging snap-shot data from cross-sectional studies of children of differing age levels is a very crude way of investigating the developmental process and given the huge variability in rate known to characterise development in DS, it is a method which can at best provide very limited developmental information. Longitudinal research is time-consuming and expensive and with children with DS often scattered across a wide range of schools, large scale studies are often logistically problematic. This kind of research is nevertheless crucial to achieving any real understanding of developmental processes in DS. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast Piaget's and Vygotsky's views of cognitive development.

    3 star(s)

    Where Piaget views young children's play and talk as a manifestation of a natural desire to manipulate and assimilate the physical world, laying down the sensory-motor and intuitive foundations for mathematical and logical operations, Vygotsky sees it as a product of social experience and evidence for the emergence of intellectual self-control.

  2. Is the attachment bond during infancy crucial to later outcomes?

    It must be remembered however that Japanese infants are infrequently separated from their mother so the Strange Situation is more likely to be excessively stressful for these infants. The above studies show limitations of the Strange Situation requiring consideration in weighing up how valid the assessment is in regard to cultural influences and practices.

  1. Compare, contrast and evaluate the Biological perspective and the Behavioral perspective of psychology.

    Traditionally behaviourism tends to not focus on mental processes due to the difficulties posed when attempting to objectively observe them. It is considered that a powerful effect on human behaviour is that observational learning, the learned behaviours that are picked up through the observation of other's actions.

  2. Genes: reasons why some men are just born to cheat.

    For example, women place greater emphasis on emotional connection, whereas men place more emphasis on the sexual experience (Glass & Wright, 1992). Furthermore, research suggests that marriage deters men from engaging in infidelity. Treas and Giesen (2000) report that married men are less likely to engage in infidelity than those who cohabit.

  1. How do children develop a Theory of Mind? You will need to discuss ...

    child's lack of interest in the environment and difficulty in processing social information. In relation to this, many parents of autistic children emphasise the fact that they feel their child is not understood by society, that they can not express themselves to others in the way they want to.

  2. What is Temperament? - can it affect child development?

    Thomas and Chess studied temperament in the 1950's. They would use a nine-dimensional framework to evaluate any child referred to them. The child could be aged from infancy to adolescence. "1) Activity Level: How much and how vigorously the child moves about. 2) Quality of mood: whether the child is predominantly happy or whiny and miserable.

  1. Language acquisition is a considerable achievement.

    Brown and Fraser (1963) proposed that children's telegraphic speech could be regarded as grammatical in that it was correctly formed, omitting only a verb or inflection (e.g., chair broken). Specifically, Chomsky (1957, 199..., 1995, 2000) argues that the children show creativity in their use of language (i.e.

  2. Comparison/Contrast of L1 and L2 Acquisition.

    Cognitive Factors Many language researchers, like Jean Piaget, see language development as a part of the cognitive development of a child. That is, as the child's brain develops, so does his/her linguistic ability. Piaget (Piaget & Inhelder, 1966) outlines the course of a child's intellectual development through the following stages: - the sensori-motor stage ( ages 0 to 2 )

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work