- Join over 1.2 million students every month
- Accelerate your learning by 29%
- Unlimited access for just £4.99 per month
The Human Proteome Project - “Genes were easy”
- Essay length: 2880 words
- Submitted: 11/07/2002
-
Marked by teacher:
Rebecca Lewis
Teacher essay summary
A far reaching and comprehensive discussion of the proteome project, that still has the potential to be improved in several ways. In places there is far too much detail: In several parts the student has discussed in depth techniques that are not actually relevant to answering the question. This has made the work unnecessarily long. There is also confusion in a number of places over some terminology. When writing a technological essay, a real effort should be made to define all terms clearly and as soon as they are discussed. The student also regularly slips into a colloquial "chatty" voice, which is not appropriate for a formal piece of writing such as this. At my (Russell Group) university, this piece of work would receive 3/5.
Marked by teacher Rebecca Lewis 01/01/1970
The first 200 words of this essay...
The Human Proteome Project - “Genes were easy”
Found what you're looking for?
- Start learning 29% faster today
- Over 150,000 essays available
- Just £4.99 a month
Not the one? We have 100's more
Genetics (view all)
- Darwin and Natural Selection
- Genetic Fingerprinting has Uncovered More Than Suspect Culpa...
- Scientists and Their Discoveries.
- Explain How The Development of Electrophoretic Techniques ha...
- The purpose of this lab is to predict the molecular and ioni...
MbT essay summary
A far reaching and comprehensive discussion of the proteome project, that still has the potential to be improved in several ways. In places there is far too much detail: In several parts the student has discussed in depth techniques that are not actually relevant to answering the question. This has made the work unnecessarily long. There is also confusion in a number of places over some terminology. When writing a technological essay, a real effort should be made to define all terms clearly and as soon as they are discussed. The student also regularly slips into a colloquial "chatty" voice, which is not appropriate for a formal piece of writing such as this. At my (Russell Group) university, this piece of work would receive 3/5.
