- Level: University Degree
- Subject: Biological Sciences
- Word count: 1992
Within the field of Developmental Psychology, researchers continue to evaluate the significance of early childhood experiences and how they impact on later development.
Extracts from this document...
Introduction
I.D 12001726 Introduction Within the field of Developmental Psychology, researchers continue to evaluate the significance of early childhood experiences and how they impact on later development. Whilst some theorists propose that the quality of attachments in infancy is a strong determinant of socio-emotional and personality outcomes in later life (Waters, et al., 2000), many critics have also argued, that too much emphasis has been placed on the early bonds with parents, and that other factors such as individual and cultural differences are often neglected (Harris, 2009: Field, 1996). Whilst many theories of attachment have been proposed over the years, perhaps one of the most influential theories is that of British Psychiatrist and Psychoanalyst John Bowlby. This report will therefore set out to discuss some of the main characteristics of Bowlby?s Theory of Attachment, whilst examining some of the supporting evidence and criticisms which have been levied against his pioneering work.[a] Bowlby?s Theory of Attachment Influenced by the works of Sigmund Freud and Melanie Klein, Bowlby placed a great emphasis on early childhood experiences. However, unlike the orthodox Freudian views which focused on the instinctive drives and psychosexual conflicts of young children, Bowlby gave greater attention to the ongoing interpersonal relationship between mother and child (Lister-Ford, 2007: 17). Drawing on his initial interest in Lorenz?s (1937) ...read more.
Middle
As a result of these studies, three types of attachment were identified, secure, insecure avoidant and insecure resistant, as well as identifying the importance of sensitive and responsive caregiving for the development of secure attachments. (N-Hoeksema, et al., 2009: 91-94). Whilst Ainsworth?s research has been replicated with consistent results appearing in other studies (Smith & Pedersen, 1988; Lewis & Feiring, 1989), it could be argued, however, that the ?Strange Situation? revolves around westernised norms and values towards attachment and so cultural differences may exist[d]. More recent evidence has been provided to support Bowlby?s theory on attachment in studies which have been conducted on the ?Cinderella Effect?, which is a term coined by psychologists to describe the increasing rates of abuse and maltreatment experienced by children at the hands of their step-parents. According to Workman & Reader (2014: 212) studies conducted by Daly and Wilson (1998), have shown that step-children are at a higher risk of being maltreated by their step-parent than their biological parent, and have shown that parents who are not genetically related, are 120 times more likely to murder their step-children than their own genetic offspring. Their studies have also shown that for children under the age of three, who have a step parent present in the family home, there is a 7 fold increased risk of experiencing abuse than if they had two biological parents present. ...read more.
Conclusion
831-837. Lister-Ford, C., 2007. A Short Introduction to Psychotherapy. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. N-Hoeksema, S., Fredrickson, L., Loftus, G. R. & Wagenaar, W. A., 2009. Atkinson & Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology. 15th ed. Hampshire: Cengage Learning EMEA. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J., Miyake, K. & Morelli, G., 2000. Attachment and Culture. American Psychologist, Volume 55, pp. 1093-1104. Smith, P. B. & Pederson, D. R., 1988. Maternal Sensitivity and Patterns of Infant-Mother Attachmen. Child Development, 59(4), p. 1097. Waters, E., Hamilton, C. E. & Weinfield, N., 2000. The Stability of Attchment Security from Infancy to Adolescence and Early Adulthood. Childhood Development, 71(3), pp. 678-683. Workman, L. & Reader, W., 2014. Evolutionary Psychology. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ________________ Psychology Marking Sheet ID number Module Level Academic Year Mark Awarded 74 A 70+ B 60 ? 69 C 50 - 59 D 40 ? 49 E 30- 39 F 39< Response: The information and discussion responds clearly to the question asked. X Structure Well structured, focused, and clear and fluent writing, X Knowledge and Understanding Demonstrates a full understanding of the area, insightful discussion and analysis of relevant material and independent and critical judgment is made on the literature used. X Argument: The contention or argument is presented clearly with the different views presented objectively and the summary based on sound ideas. Brings new dimensions to argument x Comments General You have a very fluid, articulate and succinct manner of presenting your thoughts and points. A very important skill. ...read more.
This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Developmental Psychology section.
Found what you're looking for?
- Start learning 29% faster today
- 150,000+ documents available
- Just £6.99 a month