• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe, compare and contrast one content theory and one process theory of motivation. Evaluate their appropriateness for the current business environment

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe, compare and contrast one content theory and one process theory of motivation. Evaluate their appropriateness for the current business environment. Assignment 1 Managing People Module 26302 Student Number: 2011432859 Motivation is a complex concept to define and is persistently explored not only by psychologists but also by many global organizations. With reference to the Oxford dictionary, motivation is "a reason or reasons for acting or behaving in a particular way". In contrast to the definition, there are numerous theories that attempt to explain the true nature of the concept. As a result of the diverse beliefs, it is argued (Wilson, 2010, 136) that there is no single reliable theory that can be used to solve motivational issues. Managers need to understand the principles of the leading theories in order to use motivation techniques effectively. It is perhaps one of the most desirable skills a manager can possess, as they would be able to influence their employee's behavior where a more satisfied and motivated employee would perform better and are less likely to quit their job. The theories based on this subject can be contrasting and are categorized into two types: content and process theories. Content theories assume that everyone possesses a common set of needs and looks at what motivates people at work. Process theories on the other hand stress the difference in people's needs and focuses on the cognitive processes. One of the most famous and influential content theories is the works of Abraham Maslow (1943). ...read more.

Middle

As everyone has distinctive beliefs, two employees in the same firm with the same roles and possibly the same rewards may still feel they are treated differently, and experience inequity compared to one another in the view that they will have different perceptions of what is equitable. Another limitation is when issues arise, it does not predict which response an individual will follow. Nevertheless, when such issues arise across the company's staff, it is up to the manager to find a solution and reduce the scale and influence of the matter. This can include adapting schemes such as job evaluation to maintain balance and to indicate that they are aware of the problems. Looking at the just the notion of the two theories discussed, it is easy to see that there are no similar features between them. However, from a managerial perspective, they do relate to each other in the sense of sampling them in the work environment. If a manager wishes to gain a better understanding of motivation in the workplace, studying one theory may be not be sufficient enough but the combination of both content and process theories will give a better insight to the topic. If an organization adopts Maslow's theory, they will have to look at meeting their deficiency needs situated at the lower levels of the hierarchy before moving onto the higher level needs and in the order they must be fulfilled. ...read more.

Conclusion

The theories are initially constructed to attempt to explain the phenomenal nature of motivation but applying theories into practice is easier said than done, and that they seen managerial guidelines for motivating staff than explanations of human behaviors. It is merely impossible to satisfy the needs of everyone and that the focus on satisfying the need of one individual may lead to the problem of inequity experienced by another individual. The success of a business is largely dependent upon the manager's ability to motivate their staff as a motivated employee' works best in the interest of the firm and will lead to be more productive and efficient means. The type approach the manager has to motivation will depend on the strength and desire of the needs and the number of different perceptions that taking a course of action will help satisfy those needs. The best strategy that a manager can adopt is to experiment with various content theories and process theories as there are undoubtedly multiple challenges that they will come across. Every single company will have a distinctive group of employees, therefore they will have a different set of needs and perspectives. The effectiveness of the motivational strategies for one company may not work for the other, as there is no single solution. The best outcome is for the company to discover which strategy brings a greater impact among their employees and adopt the principles whilst being flexible. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Human Resource Management section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Human Resource Management essays

  1. Leadership Theories and the Importance of Beliefs and Values.

    We know that beliefs dramatically affect performance and consequently the ability to achieve goals. Implicit Beliefs, Articulated Beliefs and Beliefs In Action Articulated beliefs or explicit beliefs and values are those that the leader openly acknowledges -- they are also called espoused beliefs.

  2. Motivation. The purpose of this brief paper is to explore the main variables affecting ...

    So the questionnaire contained question upon the independent variables (age, position, decision involvement and rewards). And the dependent variable (Motivation) which is an operational variable that has been indicated through its elements). 4.1.2 The Scaling: The questionnaire included 6 items, with 15 questions, and the variables were scaled as follows: - Age was measured using the open ended (Ratio Scale).

  1. Context of Employee Relations and Industrial Conflict

    * Staff status is a process whereby manual and craft employees gradually receive staff terms and conditions of employment, usually upon reaching some qualifying standard for example length of service. * Harmonization means the reduction of differences in the pay-structure and other employment conditions between categories of employee, usually manual and staff employees.

  2. Motivation Theories

    (Buelens M., Broeck H., Vanderheyden K., Kreitner R. & Kinicki A., 2006, p: 177) "He identifies that with the most basic need emerging first and the most sophisticated need last. People move up the hierarchy one level at a time.

  1. Organisation Theory and Behaviour essay

    That means that a person looks at others who are doing the same or similar jobs to them and compare how much effort that they put into the job and how much they are rewarded for their work. For example a person who was working very hard in a job

  2. Study of Agency Theory. This essay is having research on agency theory and ...

    Literature Review and Relative Analysis Jensen and Meckling (1976) mentioned in their article "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure" that the principal-agent problem will emerge when the situations happen in which 1) the agent acquires compensation from principle and act very useful performance for the

  1. Some managers assume that money is the only motivation for all their employees. Do ...

    McGregor's theory shows that management style and decision-making depends on which theory management believes applies to their employees. This suggests that managers think some workers are motivated by money. Although all the theories have strong appeal they also have a number of criticisms which we are going to explore in the following paragraph.

  2. The nature of motivation.

    Several complexities exists which tend to complicate the theoretical simplicity. Dunnette and Kirchner, (1965) and four others have identified four such complications. First, motives can only be inferred they cannot be seen. In fact at least five reasons have been identified as to why is it difficult to infer motives from observed behavior: 1.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work