Problem Solution Global Communciations

Authors Avatar

Problem Solution: Global Communications    

Running head:  PROBLEM SOLUTION: GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS

Problem Solution: Global Communications

Vanessa Everett

University of Phoenix


Problem Solution: Global Communications

Global Communications is a telecommunications organization that is trying to survive when the industry is waning (University of Phoenix, 2004). In this scenario, they are trying to make decisions to solve the problem of increased competition, globalization, and how to lower their overhead costs. There is a clear gap between where the company is and where they want to be. Their decision making and problem solving processes and practices are not effective and they must learn to overcome their management issues before they can reach their goals. Part of the issue is that they have not clearly identified what their goals are with the support of key stakeholders. Teamwork was not really a part of their decision making or problem solving process and has affected the acceptance and implementation of their plan. Lack of information was apparent in their plan, and there was no contingency plan before selecting their solution. Global Communications have also not understood or recognized their organizational communication issues.

Alternative solutions based on their end state goals of becoming the leading global telecommunications organization by 2010. They can accomplish changes in their decision making practices within the next year, and measure progress through a 10% increase in share value, lower operating costs by 15%, and creating a governance plan to assist in problem solving. They can adopt an research and development team to keep up to date with current market intelligence and additional industry information to make better decisions. They can simultaneously create a governance plan and include all key stakeholders to gain buy in and support. They can also continue on their decision to move to India and will measure this success by accomplishing the move, dealing with employees, shareholders, and consumers with survey’s and opinion polls.

Situation Analysis

Issue and Opportunity Identification

Global Communications did not fully collaborate to create team goals. There were many key stakeholder interests at play including share value, increased competition, moving into a global market, employee benefits, and consumers of their services. Because team goals were not clearly established, decisions were made hastily without enough information, collaboration, and evaluation.

Organizations that implemented work teams as a way to improve products, services, and processes, have witnessed tremendous measurable benefits” (DeJanasz, Dowd, & Schneider, 2001, p. 321). “A group becomes a team when members demonstrate a commitment to each other and to the end goal toward which they are working” (DeJanasz, Dowd, & Schneider, 2001, p. 310).

The senior leadership team did not fully engage all the stakeholders in their decision. They did not include them in the creation of the solution and therefore implementation met with conflict.

“Using and effective future-oriented problem solving and solution development approach enable as leader to define the right problem, decide upon a wise solution, and avoid many of the derailers of leadership” (University of Phoenix, 2004,  5).

The organization may create a better solution to problems, and create smoother implementation and acceptance. “Engaging others in the process will often lead to a better solution, and engaging stakeholders will lead to a smoother implementation” (University of Phoenix, 2004, ¶52).

Global Communications did not recognize the characteristics of managerial decision making because they ignored the risk or, degree of uncertainty about the outcome of the decision (Gomez-Mejia & Balkin, 2002, ¶ 11). The negative risk was not understood or managed. Similarly, they did not understand the conflict that would arise over opposing goals.

“One of the most important activities that managers engage in is making decisions under conditions of risk and uncertainty. Most of the time, there is lack of information and a limited amount of time available to make the decision.” (Gomez-Mejia & Balkin, 2002, ¶1).

Global Communications can improve their decision making process by understanding the characteristics of management decisions, thus improving their decisions and contributing to the success of the organization. “The characteristics of management decision making include programmability, uncertainly, risk, conflict and scope” (Gomez-Mejia & Balkin, 2002, ¶3).

Global Communications also did not recognize the limits of rational decision making because Katrina Heinz, CEO, identified that, “Since we have already spent considerable time devising and agreeing to this strategy, we’re better served to address the challenge that we’ve set up” (University of Phoenix, 2004, P4). This tendency of decision makers to make a less rational decision after investing time and resources even if the decision is the wrong one. Gomez-Majia & Balkin state that, “The more costly the resources invested, the more likely the decision maker will be wedded to the chosen alternative, even if new evidence shows it was the wrong choice” (Gomez-Mejia & Balkin, 2002, ¶4).

The Board and Leadership team did not have sufficient information, and therefore could not accurately assess the likelihood of varying results of their decision.

The organization can improve the predictability and the consequences of their actions, thus leading to a more successful organization. “Uncertainty means that the manager has insufficient information to know the consequences of different actions” (Bateman & Snell, 2004, ¶9).

          There was no apparent contingency plan in place when the decision was communicated into the organization. No alternative scenarios or action plans were considered at this point.

“The process of considering multiple scenarios raises important “what if” questions for decision makers and highlights the need for preparedness and contingency plans” (Bateman & Snell, 2004, ¶49).

By generating contingency plans the organization may better be able to predict the future of the business and their decision making leading to a better managed decision making company. Sometimes decision makers can build in safeguards against an uncertain future by considering the potential consequences of several different scenarios. Then they generate contingency plans – alternative courses of action that can be implemented based on how the future unfolds” (Bateman & Snell, 2004, ¶47).

Many channels of communication were used when the new plan was accepted by the board and implementation was beginning. They should not have utilized these channels I this instance. The Union Vice President heard the news through the ‘grapevine’ she then contacted the Executive Vice President – HR and PR through e-mail which allowed for flaming to occur. “Employees perform better if they can quickly determine the best communication channels for the situation and are flexible enough to use different methods, as the occasion requires” (McShane-Von Glinow, 2004, P332).

Communication is key in successful organization and the channel in which you communicate. Increased and better communication for Global will help the organization improve its operations, gain more understanding, utilize information more effectively, and enhance all aspects of decision making. “A critical part of the communication model is the channel through which information is transmitted” (McShane-Von Glinow, 2004, P326).

The organization’s leaders did not seem to have enough information regarding t he issues within their company. The CEO stated that it’s nice to get out of the fortieth floor and have a reality check (University of Phoenix, 2004, P5).

Had she decided to do this before presenting to the board or accepting the alternative she did, she may have had more information as to the acceptance of this plan. She would have had better sense that the employees were already accepting another huge change in order to help the company.

Executives can improve their decision making and problem solving skill by learning how to communicate more effectively and gain all aspects of information required for decision making. In an organizational context, can’t rely on employee surveys and company newsletters alone to understand what is happening in the organization. They need to get out of the executive suite and meet directly with employees at all levels and on their turf to sully understand the issues…Management By Walking Around - MBWA” (McShane-Von Glinow, 2004, P344).


Stakeholder Perspectives/Ethical Dilemmas

The key stakeholders in this situation are small businesses and consumer customers, the shareholders, the leadership team, the Board, the Union, and the employees – specifically the call centre representatives. Each has different interests, rights, and values, which may be conflicting in rights and ethical dilemmas.

Join now!

The small businesses and consumer customers are key stakeholders who want exceptional, value based, services, which are competitive within the communications industry. Their interests are personal, as they want the best service, at the best, quality and value. They want what is available to others and by others for local, long distance and international telephone service.

The shareholders are ultimately interested in the value of their share as it has dramatically declined recently. They will hold the board and organization accountable. As shareholders they have varying interests and ethical dilemmas. It is individual, as to what they may value ...

This is a preview of the whole essay