• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should tour operators take responsibility for addressing destination level sustainability?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Should tour operators take responsibility for addressing destination level sustainability?" For several years, there has been much deliberation concerning who ought to be accountable for ensuring that tourism destinations are developed in a way that "meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs" (WCED 1987, p.7). Due to the numerous stakeholders involved where destination level sustainability is concerned, it is particularly difficult to decide who, if any, holds more responsibility than another. This essay shall address the various stakeholders and attempt to give reasoning as to whether or not it is just to judge tour operators as being more liable than any other interested party in the tourism industry to encourage sustainability. Tourism has both positive and negative impacts on destinations and their inhabitants. Whilst benefiting from an increase in revenue, job creation, improvements in infrastructure and amplified awareness of local people and their environments, destinations simultaneously suffer from exhaustion of resources, lack of respect for local cultures, disturbance of indigenous communities, and perhaps most significantly, a rapidly increasing pollution rate as a result of development of areas to meet the needs of tourists. In order to minimise such negative effects, it is crucial that tour operators, tourists, local communities, local businesses, local governments, trade associations, NGO's, and charitable bodies work together and promote sustainable tourism. There are several principles of sustainable tourism including the sustainable use of resources, management of consumption and waste, diversity maintenance, the integration of tourism into planning, support for local economies, improving local communities, communication between stakeholders and the public, training staff efficiently, marketing tourism responsibly, and undertaking research (WWF UK, 1992). Although each of the aforementioned groups has an important role to play with regards to sustainability, it is necessary to analyse which should primarily be responsible and to what extent they can be. ...read more.

Middle

This has resulted in them winning awards such as The Guardian's "Best Tour Operator" award for 2007, and being granted the highest possible Responsible Travel rating from AITO. While these types of tour operators are making a concerted effort to be responsible for sincere reasons, it may be suggested that several of the other tour operators who have made statements claiming to be responsible are simply using this as a marketing ploy to influence demand in an increasingly growing market for sustainable tourism package holidays. It is important for tour operators to make a good impression on their potential consumers and this is being done by promoting the idea of responsible tourism through statements on their websites and laying down guidelines on their websites as to how tourists may behave correctly in order to assist the struggle towards sustainable tourism. Companies for whom profitability and wellbeing of their shareholders is key would be very eager to build up their customer base in order to increase profitability, perhaps charging higher prices for tourists to benefit from theoretically more unique eco-tourism holidays. The actions of such tour operators may appear to be ethical and moral, in the best interests of destinations with which they liaise, but in reality could be somewhat self-fulfilling. It has been suggested that "if market advantage is not the force which drives companies forwards towards responsibility, then [...] is it negative PR" that encourages companies to act, or appear to act, more responsibly (Miller 2001, p.595). Certain tour operators have endeavoured to remove this preconception by sticking up for themselves and claiming that efforts to be responsible are due to them holding themselves responsible because they know they have the capacity to be, rather than putting on a front in an attempt to woo consumers. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although sustainable development requires vast financial and physical input which renders some smaller tour operators unable to help to a large degree due to lack of investment opportunities, larger tour operators have great potential to invest time, money and expertise in destination sustainability. This may sacrifice a small percentage of sustainability in the short run, but if tour operators are to remain fully operational in the future, it is vital that destinations are sustained and do not become exhausted. The long term benefits of future holidays to such destinations would somewhat compensate for a short-term loss of profits. As stated by Miller and Twining-Ward 2005, with better information about the social-ecological systems being managed and with improved monitoring, tour operators can commit to conceptualising, planning and managing so that sustainability may thrive. I do not feel, however, that destination level sustainability can be achieved without an integrated stakeholder approach and whilst I think that tour operators could assume the largest degree of responsibility on an individual level, I support the argument that "any successful quest for sustainability will be collective" (National Academies Press 1999, p.3) and that "it is important to work with a cross-section of stakeholders encompassing the diversity of views and interests present in the destination - including the local authorities, the private sector, civil society and NGOs" (TOI un-dated). This can be illustrated by the "Travel Operators for Tigers" initiative in which tour operators are working with local suppliers, government and communities to sustain tiger populations in India. This is a prime example of how tourists and tour operators can help to give something back to the destinations they are visiting and that destination level sustainability can be achieved if all interested parties share responsibility for, and work cohesively towards, this aim. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Management Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Management Studies essays

  1. Sustainability Report. Aims: To analyse and study the key strategies towards environment and sustainability ...

    to individual polluters and are more likely to remain as external costs borne by the community. In the long run, few costs can only be considered as external. When the scientific research that supports environmental planning expands, the domain of external costs will shrink.

  2. Innovation For Business Success. It is possible to be innovative in both large ...

    see, so that all managers can know the goals of all other managers. An example of this is senior manager Andrew Logan, Newcrest's General Manager of Development, who reports directly to the CEO. Andrew must achieve step change improvement initiatives.

  1. Analysis of HSBC Sustainability Report

    A major initiative taken by HSBC in this regard is the Future First program. This is a $10 million, 5 year (2007-2012) program run by HSBC Global in around 49 countries.1 To implement this, HSBC partners with various NGO's by providing them with support.

  2. Analysis of Operation of Toyota

    1.7 Production Preparation Process (3P) To ensure smooth and rapid transition of new designs to the factories, Toyota considers the manufacturability of their products from the standpoint of touch labor, standard materials, cell-layout, task time, capacity... A model for this "Production Preparation Process" (3P)

  1. Corporate Social Responsibility

    is not only limited within the company, it also embraces a wide range of social responsibilities into stakeholders which include local communities, environment, suppliers, business partners, investors and customers. Organisations have economic responsibilities in local community and businesses and local community reciprocate each other.

  2. Critically evaluate the arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility and isolate whether you think it ...

    These needs could range from economic concerns to societal and environmental issues. CSR has the ability to strengthen a company by building a loyal consumer following. It can mean the difference between long-term success and failure. A slight miscalculation of key social and economical issues could result in ruined reputations, damaged financial integrity and injured relationships with customers and stockholders.

  1. CSR - Corporate social responsibility.

    Ethical principles do not change, and staying constant by culture and national groups and for historical periods. (Handout of CSR, 2004). Tesco's is Britains leading food retailer and has gained this position in the market throw giving good value and services to the customer.

  2. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

    While the company provides small grants and loads of encouragement, the real contribution lies in the time and energy that staff, their family members, retirees and members of the community themselves willingly give, in support of a variety of causes under the banner of 'We Care, We Share'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work