• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should tour operators take responsibility for addressing destination level sustainability?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Should tour operators take responsibility for addressing destination level sustainability?" For several years, there has been much deliberation concerning who ought to be accountable for ensuring that tourism destinations are developed in a way that "meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs" (WCED 1987, p.7). Due to the numerous stakeholders involved where destination level sustainability is concerned, it is particularly difficult to decide who, if any, holds more responsibility than another. This essay shall address the various stakeholders and attempt to give reasoning as to whether or not it is just to judge tour operators as being more liable than any other interested party in the tourism industry to encourage sustainability. Tourism has both positive and negative impacts on destinations and their inhabitants. Whilst benefiting from an increase in revenue, job creation, improvements in infrastructure and amplified awareness of local people and their environments, destinations simultaneously suffer from exhaustion of resources, lack of respect for local cultures, disturbance of indigenous communities, and perhaps most significantly, a rapidly increasing pollution rate as a result of development of areas to meet the needs of tourists. In order to minimise such negative effects, it is crucial that tour operators, tourists, local communities, local businesses, local governments, trade associations, NGO's, and charitable bodies work together and promote sustainable tourism. There are several principles of sustainable tourism including the sustainable use of resources, management of consumption and waste, diversity maintenance, the integration of tourism into planning, support for local economies, improving local communities, communication between stakeholders and the public, training staff efficiently, marketing tourism responsibly, and undertaking research (WWF UK, 1992). Although each of the aforementioned groups has an important role to play with regards to sustainability, it is necessary to analyse which should primarily be responsible and to what extent they can be. ...read more.

Middle

This has resulted in them winning awards such as The Guardian's "Best Tour Operator" award for 2007, and being granted the highest possible Responsible Travel rating from AITO. While these types of tour operators are making a concerted effort to be responsible for sincere reasons, it may be suggested that several of the other tour operators who have made statements claiming to be responsible are simply using this as a marketing ploy to influence demand in an increasingly growing market for sustainable tourism package holidays. It is important for tour operators to make a good impression on their potential consumers and this is being done by promoting the idea of responsible tourism through statements on their websites and laying down guidelines on their websites as to how tourists may behave correctly in order to assist the struggle towards sustainable tourism. Companies for whom profitability and wellbeing of their shareholders is key would be very eager to build up their customer base in order to increase profitability, perhaps charging higher prices for tourists to benefit from theoretically more unique eco-tourism holidays. The actions of such tour operators may appear to be ethical and moral, in the best interests of destinations with which they liaise, but in reality could be somewhat self-fulfilling. It has been suggested that "if market advantage is not the force which drives companies forwards towards responsibility, then [...] is it negative PR" that encourages companies to act, or appear to act, more responsibly (Miller 2001, p.595). Certain tour operators have endeavoured to remove this preconception by sticking up for themselves and claiming that efforts to be responsible are due to them holding themselves responsible because they know they have the capacity to be, rather than putting on a front in an attempt to woo consumers. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although sustainable development requires vast financial and physical input which renders some smaller tour operators unable to help to a large degree due to lack of investment opportunities, larger tour operators have great potential to invest time, money and expertise in destination sustainability. This may sacrifice a small percentage of sustainability in the short run, but if tour operators are to remain fully operational in the future, it is vital that destinations are sustained and do not become exhausted. The long term benefits of future holidays to such destinations would somewhat compensate for a short-term loss of profits. As stated by Miller and Twining-Ward 2005, with better information about the social-ecological systems being managed and with improved monitoring, tour operators can commit to conceptualising, planning and managing so that sustainability may thrive. I do not feel, however, that destination level sustainability can be achieved without an integrated stakeholder approach and whilst I think that tour operators could assume the largest degree of responsibility on an individual level, I support the argument that "any successful quest for sustainability will be collective" (National Academies Press 1999, p.3) and that "it is important to work with a cross-section of stakeholders encompassing the diversity of views and interests present in the destination - including the local authorities, the private sector, civil society and NGOs" (TOI un-dated). This can be illustrated by the "Travel Operators for Tigers" initiative in which tour operators are working with local suppliers, government and communities to sustain tiger populations in India. This is a prime example of how tourists and tour operators can help to give something back to the destinations they are visiting and that destination level sustainability can be achieved if all interested parties share responsibility for, and work cohesively towards, this aim. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Management Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Management Studies essays

  1. Sustainability Report. Aims: To analyse and study the key strategies towards environment and sustainability ...

    This can also generate a positive message to investors and financial analysts with regards to the firms manufacturing performance. Environmental and social costs and benefits are easy to find and measure. Companies should also need to incur other impacts like the costs for compliance with legislations.

  2. Innovation For Business Success. It is possible to be innovative in both large ...

    Newcrest takes a pull approach to innovation, namely it tries to solve real problems and finds technologies to these known problems, more that push approaches. Examples are solutions such as Reef miner which has come from the platinum industry, and rope conveyors.

  1. Critically evaluate the arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility and isolate whether you think it ...

    The debate over business's role in society is based around two opposing arguments. On one side, it is argued that social issues are peripheral to corporate agenda. This perspective maintains that corporations and society pursue different goals, and that the objectives of one can only be achieved at the expense of the other.

  2. Corporate Social Responsibility

    corporate should prevent the creating of environmental damages, because it pollutes environment and affects ordinary people's life due to pollution of water, air and soil. Several years ago, one of Ashland Oil's tanks erupted and spelt more than 500,000 gallons of diesel fuel into Pennsylvania's Monongahela River.

  1. CSR - Corporate social responsibility.

    * Viewing manager responsibility is not quantitative but quality. In fact, the relation between organization and its stakeholders, influence or benefit is two way not one way. 4.1. External stakeholders Tesco with a external policy which is Tesco participates in the Ethical Trading Initiative and The Fair Trade Foundation.

  2. Analysis of Operation of Toyota

    Actually, technology alone won't guarantee productivity gains; it must be used wisely and throughout fully. Without carefully planning, technology can actually reduce productivity, especially if it leads to inflexibility, high costs or mismatched operations. In this situation, we can see clearly that the factor affecting Toyota productivity positively is high technology.

  1. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

    While the company provides small grants and loads of encouragement, the real contribution lies in the time and energy that staff, their family members, retirees and members of the community themselves willingly give, in support of a variety of causes under the banner of 'We Care, We Share'.

  2. Corporate Social Responsibility

    This level of responsibility by the firms can establish their sales and market share. As consumers observe companies behavior they would be attracted to firms like Avon who is in support of Breast Cancer Campaigns and The body Shop that provide financial support to poorer countries as they both contribute to local and global communities.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work