• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Anne Boleyn - historians such as G. W. Bernard, E. W. Ives and Retha Warnick are examples of scholars who continue to attempt to solve the mystery surrounding the fall of Anne Boleyn. Each attempting to answer the following questions: What events brought

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Anne Boleyn was executed on May 19th 1536 and her marriage to King Henry VIII was declared as invalid. The charges with which Anne was accused include adultery with five men, incest with her brother George Boleyn, and high treason for allegedly imagining the Kings death and conspiring with her lovers to procure the Kings death. Long after her fall Anne Boleyn continues to fascinate people all over the world. Her life has been adapted into numerous novels, plays, songs, television dramas and films and is also the focus of historical debate. This fascination results from the continuing controversy over her death and the important role she played during a turbulent era in English history. Many feel that Henry's marriage to Anne and her subsequent execution were part of the complex beginning stages of the political and religious upheaval of the English reformation, where Anne herself actively promoted the cause of Church reform. Anne and Henry also gave birth to Queen Elizabeth I, who ruled England for forty years and is often considered one of England's greatest rulers. A limited amount of resources and information survives about the fall of Anne Boleyn thus making it a compelling but easily debatable historical event. However, historians such as G. W. Bernard, E. W. Ives and Retha Warnick are examples of scholars who continue to attempt to solve the mystery surrounding the fall of Anne Boleyn. Each attempting to answer the following questions: What events brought about Anne's downfall? ...read more.

Middle

He also investigates each of Anne's alleged lovers individually considering Anne's ability to travel and mistakes made by court clerks to explain any inconsistencies in the alleged dates of the affairs. Bernard decides that because Wyatt, Bryan and Page were all arrested and then released while Norris, Weston, Breteon, Boleyn and Smeaton were arrested, tried and executed it is rational to surmise that Anne was involved with at least some of the accused. Though all the courtier gentlemen accused denied the charges Bernard concludes that, "[p]erhaps the safest guess for a modern historian is that Anne had indeed committed adultery with Norris and briefly with Mark Smeaton and that there was enough circumstantial evidence to cast reasonable doubt in the denials of the others." Bernard's case is built on a solid scholarly assessment of sources. He takes a well known story and re-examines all of the contemporary evidence and through this process creates a new position. Though he often follows a "what if?" scenario he approaches sources and events from a mathematical perspective which forces the reader to be open minded. Bernard's use of primary sources like Eustace Chapuys and the Lancelot de Carles poem strengthens his argument. As he often demonstrates the limitations and biases of these sources, they do not interfere with his argument for the most part. However, though Bernard's argument is compelling it lacks some consideration of historical details. Firstly, he does not consider the couples need and desire for a male heir and it seems unlikely that Anne Boleyn would have risked her pregnancy with so many affairs. ...read more.

Conclusion

To further support this point Ives demonstrates how the law was manipulated to support the charges and questions why such steps were taken if the accused were indeed guilty. . Like Bernard, Ives believes that Henry, "turned against Anne between 18 and 24 of April" however, Ives links Henry's motivation to courtiers of the conservative faction rather than Henry's own ideas. In support of this theory he refers to two letters written by Chapuys which indicate Henry's interest in Jane and growing support for Princess Mary. In support of his own argument, that Anne was innocent, Ives first refers to two letters written by Chapuys. For Ives these letters indicate Henry's interest in Jane and growing support for Princess Mary, Henry's daughter with Katherine of Aragon, both of which he feels led to Anne's destruction Ives examines all the events surrounding Anne's fall and connects motives to, "dislike for the Boleyns, respect for the Aragon marriage and hostility to recent attacks on the church, but... primarily personal terms." Ives argument is convincing because it is a comprehensive, detailed account of what solid historical evidence is available. He makes a clear distinction between what material may be conjecture and what material is more reliable and objective. His consideration of the inconsistencies of records, review of relationships and roles and is what makes his argument the most believable. Ives portrayal of Anne reveals someone with intellect, power and passion rather than Bernard's meeker version of Anne, such a portrayal seems more realistic for a woman who There are some elements however which weaken Ives argument. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree 1500-1599 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree 1500-1599 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was there a decisive change in ideas about masculinity and femininity

    the world of work, many jobs and professions were unavailable to them and they were paid less than men. As the eighteenth century began ideas about the nature of biological differences between man and women began to change. Dissection of human bodies, forbidden for centuries, became widespread at medical schools in the late sixteenth century.

  2. To what extent can Wolsey be considered the master rather than the servant in ...

    Starkey (2002) agrees with this view, noting that Henry's lack of concern for routine administration was a perfect opportunity for Wolsey to advance his career. Furthermore Starkey notes that Wolsey was far better than Henry's other ministers at implementing policy and managing the king.

  1. Tudor Coursework - Elizabethan foreign policy.

    The second armada of 1588 was more powerful, Elizabeth was lucky to avoid invasion. Three more attacks by armada followed, none of which were successful. However, by this time what little relations remained between Elizabeth and Philip were gone. From Elizabeth I's prospective religion should not have been much of a factor in her relationship with Philip II.

  2. Assess the view that the Dutch rebels challenged Philip IIs rule primarily in defense ...

    freedom of speech, they had no say in how the extra revenue was spent, further disempowering them. Parker agrees with this, saying 'new troubles... motivated principally by the new government's attempt to impose illegally a 10-per-cent Value Added Tax on all sales.31'The people's reaction to this is evidenced in the

  1. In all his endeavours Leonardo favoured innovation over established knowledge and the traditions of ...

    However Leonardo's achievements impossible as they were can still be interpreted as marvellous innovations for the technological age. Another innovation within the Sforza horse project was the pose of the horse. Leonardo wanted the horse to rear up on its back legs, yet this was not possible as the combined weight of the horse would have crushed the legs.

  2. HISTORIA DE LA LENGUA INGLESA

    Queda desprestigiada la lengua del periodo anglosaj�n y se produce una diglosia al existir una lengua dominante y otra dominada. *? Middle English (ME): el ingl�s medio abarca del S.XII al S.XV. La situaci�n no es prevalente durante todo el periodo ya que el duque de Normand�a pierde este t�tulo.

  1. Why Were Some of the English Poor Laws passed between 1531 and 1598 Controversial?

    Such men were literally driven to vagrancy. It is hardly surprising that they felt themselves persecuted by their superiors, and that on occasion they resorted to violence."4 The Act of 1536 was the first attempt on the behalf of the authorities, to provide provisions for the deserving poor under a

  2. Why was it so difficult to decide between true and false visions and apparitions ...

    The visit was simply to ask the woman to rearrange the mass for him. When she completed the task she was said to have watched the priest form into a child whilst entering a challis which transmitted him to heaven to rest8.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work