• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There is a fundamental difference between Constitutional supremacy and Parliamentary Supremacy.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

NAME: KERRY CANNON ID#: 0904427 SUBJECT: LLB101 LAW AND LEGAL SYSTEMS LECTURER: MRS. MARCIA ROBINSON TIME: 9:00AM - 11:00AM (RM LT 9B) Monday 14, 2009 QUESTION: DISCUSS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONAL AND PARLIAMENTARY SUPREMACY -1- There is a fundamental difference between Constitutional supremacy and Parliamentary Supremacy. Professor King in his Hamlyn lecture defined the constitution as the set of the most important rules that regulate the relations among the different parts of the government and the people of a country. A constitution he maintained is a written statement of a state or country's constitutional rules in a document or codified form. Parliamentary Supremacy according to the Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia means a legislative body has absolute sovereignty; it is supreme to all other government institutions (including any executive or judicial bodies as they may exist). It implies that the legislative body may change or repeal any prior legislative acts. ...read more.

Middle

There are major differences between Parliamentary Supremacy and Constitutional Supremacy as it relates to Parliamentary supremacy the rules of the constitution is not written, codified it does not exist in a documentary form. What is written are the principal sources of the constitution which are Acts of Parliament and laws as are the principles of Common Law. Albert Dicey stated that with Parliamentary Supremacy there are three (3) pillars under which it can be found are (i) Parliament has the right to make or unmake any law whatever. (ii) No person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament. Parliament is not bound by its predecessor. (iii) A valid act of Parliament cannot be questioned by the court. Parliament is the supreme law maker. Flexibility of Parliamentary Supremacy- UK constitution is essential flexible. ...read more.

Conclusion

If any other law conflict with the constitution, the Jamaican Supreme Court can strike them down such a law as unconstitutional. -4- Flexibility for constitutional supremacy does not enjoy the same ease for amendment as Parliamentary Supremacy since it is the supreme law within the nation or state it is more difficult to amend, special procedures has to be followed. The functions of the Constitution - It lays down obligatory procedures for the state, it states basic human rights, the granting of authority to make laws. In conclusion looking at Parliamentary and Constitutional Supremacy, written constitution is most valuable as they provide guidelines as what to do in practice. However, I appreciate the role of parliamentary Supremacy since the law is described as a 'living organism'; it changes with time and as such can accommodate changes. -5- SOURCES 1. COMMONWEALTH CARIBBEAN LAW AND LEGAL SYSTEMS 2ND Edition Rose-Marie Belle Antoine 2. CONSTITUTIONAL & ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 5th Edition Neil Parpworth 3. CONSTITUTIONAL & ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 14TH Edition AW Bradley & K D Ewing ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Other Jurisdictions section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Other Jurisdictions essays

  1. Anticipatory Bail under CRPC. A critical study of the recent amendments and judicial interpretation ...

    An applicant has undoubtedly to make out a case for the grant of anticipatory bail. But one cannot go further and say that he must make a special case. While granting the bail the court may impose certain conditions as necessarily provided in section 438 (2)

  2. WHALING IN THE 21ST CENTURY: ARE AUSTRALIAN & INTERNATIONAL LAWS & POLICIES SUFFICIENT IN ...

    for leave denies the Federal Court its proper role in the Australian system of government'.56 He stated that courts must be prepared to hear and determine matters whatever their domestic or international political sensitivity is.57 IV THE IMPACT OF THE OUTCOME ON AUSTRALIAN & INTERNATIONAL LAW & POLICIES One of

  1. Introduction to American Law. 5 questions on the US legal system.

    The Commerce Clause is perhaps Congress�s most important power. The Commerce Clause grants Congress to "regulate Commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes". 3. Constitutional Amendments The legislative jurisdiction of Congress have been further granted by Constitutional Amendments. The thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth Amendments broadened Congressional authority to enact legislation enforcing the

  2. Hong Kong Constitutional Law - in order to combat cross-border crime in an effective ...

    He further expressed the view that Article 19 of the BL provides that Hong Kong courts have jurisdiction over all cases in Hong Kong, as it not only defines the judicial jurisdiction of Hong Kong but also divides the judicial jurisdiction between Hong Kong and the Mainland.21 Cheung's case infringes

  1. Constitutional Equality in Singapore. The predominant purpose of unequal treatment under the Constitution ...

    separate domain.[45] While minority groups seek to protect their own interests and unique cultures, a common Singaporean identity is also cultivated in a shared space. This transformative aspect has been described as ?communitarian-type? or multi-cultural accommodation.[46] The transformative dimension is best described by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong: The different

  2. Unilateral Divorce in Muslim Law

    Nur Bibi v Ali Ahmed[43], the Allahabad High Court held that an acknowledgement of talaq under compulsion would be invalid if it was proved to be untrue. Confirmation of such a talaq is also no valid.[44] On the other hand, a written compromise signed by the husband and wife addressed

  1. Indian Law. The Legality of In Camera Trials

    It is interesting to note that though the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the capital punishment awarded to the accused for raping and killing a 14 year-old girl in this case, a mere week thereafter, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence awarded to one Rahul alias Rao Saheb,

  2. Fetal Abuse and American Law

    This potential problem is resolvable by following in the path of the Minnesota legislature and requiring that all pregnant women and newborns be drug-tested.[111] 4. Absent probable cause, the drug-testing of all pregnant women and infants is a violation of Fourth Amendment rights.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work