• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Response to Richard Vernon's Article - The Federal Citizen

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A Response to Richard Vernon's Article: The Federal Citizen Henning Fotland B00339586 Prof. Mellon 29th January 2003 In this response I will attempt to prove that federalism is not an ideologically determined system, and that the basis of its structure is visible in all types of political orientation, such as the United States, the former Soviet Union and Canada. In this response to Richard Vernon's article The Federal Citizen, I will attempt to prove that the essence of federalism is actually a general theme that is available for extraction in all levels of human interaction, from the individual in society to the highest level of supra-government. As Vernon concludes, the three conceptions which necessitate federalism as a constitutional entity are; "democratic responsiveness, the openness of choice of identification, and the preservation of politics from (unqualified) nationalism."1 To begin an assessment of Vernon's argument for federalism it is first necessary to have a working definition of what this system is and what the goals of its implementation are. It appears to be the idea of 'dual citizenship', which distinguishes the aspirations of federalism from other systems. This entails belonging to an upper-level national government as well as identifying oneself with a sub level provincial or territorial government. ...read more.

Middle

Only by narrowing the focus and reducing the size of the government and its population can the institution of government be representative of its people. This theory is considered to be a co-operative model of federalism, where all actions of government are a direct result of popular will. Unfortunately, this theory does little to support the case of minority populations and would necessitate an environment of dispassionate compromise and would pose a threat to groups that tried to distinguish themselves culturally or otherwise. This model is contrasted by a political view of pluralism, where divisions of territory are seen not as cultural demarcations but as fractions of the whole system, where power is checked and balanced by other delegates of power. This picture conflicts with the intended co-operative spirit, and would be just as likely to lead to the restraining of beneficial government action as it would be to enabling it. A division of territory will inevitably lead to inequalities between provinces, consequently, if these divisions are placed in conflict with each other there will doubtlessly be victors and vanquished. It seems fantastic that a single political system could sustain being equally present on opposite sides of the political arena. ...read more.

Conclusion

By setting ideological parameters on a universal principle such as awareness, they blinded their own awareness to the essential truth of what they were exploring. Instead of seeing the ability to juggle several conflicting alliances simultaneously as a natural and necessary condition of human and therefore societal existence, Vernon attempted to establish an absolute truth within a very specific theoretical framework. What he failed to realize was that this basic condition of awareness was the absolute truth and that it existed independent of any political system or framework. I would like to challenge Vernon to find any extant political or social system that could not be interpreted as having his general federalist structure. In conclusion, I would argue that the importance of federalism as a dualist system is a misconception and that all politically aware people exist and view themselves in a multi-levelled society. Vernon's ideological claims are not best represented by federalism from an individualistic, ideological, economic or political standpoint. The basic tenants of federalism, as outlined in his closing remarks are not representative of the broad political spectrum which the system crosses. I believe that for federalism to become a concrete political system would require a much closer definition of its constitutional framework. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Hogwood and Gunn's Framework for Policy Analysis

    That is not to say, in their minds, that issue definition is not a vital element of the policy process but that in approaching it, policy analysts must conscious of its significance and the problems it can present. 4) Forecasting Although a potentially risky business, in that you can never

  2. Examine the role of Gandhi in the development of Indian nationalism

    When the viceroy proclaimed India's involvement in the war outrage was sparked across the country. No British official had consented to Indian support in the conflict, however the Congress saw this as a chance to reach their goal and replied that support would only come after independence.

  1. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two philosophers who thought extensively on the subject ...

    or their friends, from any unjust aggressors; or out of good nature or compassion assist an oppressed nation in shaking off the yoke of tyranny? (Utopia, p.64). When human nature is trained to be good, as in Utopia, man?s effort to improve the world increases, which is the basis for Utopia?s international policies.

  2. Sovereignty and Democracy in the European Union.

    Edward Heath referred several times to the 'pooling of sovereignty'. As I observed just now, so did Mrs.Thatcher. But that was the small print. It was not the popular perception, nor even the perception in Westminster. The 1975 referendum was about resolving an internal problem within the Labour Party.

  1. Explain the role and importance of Federalism in the Constitutional system of government.

    of the Founding Fathers are represented through the Constitution, specifically the mistrust of strong central authority. Despite this "certain distrust of human nature"2, the founding fathers also realised that the Articles of Confederation were not unifying, nor strong enough to serve the peoples of Eastern America: "there are important needs

  2. Outline and Critically Assess ‘Rhodes’ Argument About ‘Hollowing Out of the State’

    This is also supported by Seaward (1997) when he cites King: "The aim of these reforms is to marginalise local government as a political institution by creating local agencies to deliver policy and by denuding its representative function". P23 On the final theme of Agencification, Seaward focus's on the scope

  1. What are the differences between federalism and devolution?

    With 'complex religious, linguistic and territorial divisions' (Budge et al 1997: 76), the system differs from classic US federalism but offers a solution to the unification of a multi-ethnic society through ethnic federalism. The negative reasons for the formation of federations provides closer checks on power and are 'necessarily conscious

  2. European Union: Council of Ministers.

    Positions of EU members that are not Germany, France, Italy and Great Britain, do not vary substantially and fall somewhere between the lines of the listed four major EU countries. France, Italy and Germany, and the Netherlands feel that both the PKK and Turkey are guilty for violating the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work