• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

A Response to Richard Vernon's Article - The Federal Citizen

Extracts from this document...


A Response to Richard Vernon's Article: The Federal Citizen Henning Fotland B00339586 Prof. Mellon 29th January 2003 In this response I will attempt to prove that federalism is not an ideologically determined system, and that the basis of its structure is visible in all types of political orientation, such as the United States, the former Soviet Union and Canada. In this response to Richard Vernon's article The Federal Citizen, I will attempt to prove that the essence of federalism is actually a general theme that is available for extraction in all levels of human interaction, from the individual in society to the highest level of supra-government. As Vernon concludes, the three conceptions which necessitate federalism as a constitutional entity are; "democratic responsiveness, the openness of choice of identification, and the preservation of politics from (unqualified) nationalism."1 To begin an assessment of Vernon's argument for federalism it is first necessary to have a working definition of what this system is and what the goals of its implementation are. It appears to be the idea of 'dual citizenship', which distinguishes the aspirations of federalism from other systems. This entails belonging to an upper-level national government as well as identifying oneself with a sub level provincial or territorial government. ...read more.


Only by narrowing the focus and reducing the size of the government and its population can the institution of government be representative of its people. This theory is considered to be a co-operative model of federalism, where all actions of government are a direct result of popular will. Unfortunately, this theory does little to support the case of minority populations and would necessitate an environment of dispassionate compromise and would pose a threat to groups that tried to distinguish themselves culturally or otherwise. This model is contrasted by a political view of pluralism, where divisions of territory are seen not as cultural demarcations but as fractions of the whole system, where power is checked and balanced by other delegates of power. This picture conflicts with the intended co-operative spirit, and would be just as likely to lead to the restraining of beneficial government action as it would be to enabling it. A division of territory will inevitably lead to inequalities between provinces, consequently, if these divisions are placed in conflict with each other there will doubtlessly be victors and vanquished. It seems fantastic that a single political system could sustain being equally present on opposite sides of the political arena. ...read more.


By setting ideological parameters on a universal principle such as awareness, they blinded their own awareness to the essential truth of what they were exploring. Instead of seeing the ability to juggle several conflicting alliances simultaneously as a natural and necessary condition of human and therefore societal existence, Vernon attempted to establish an absolute truth within a very specific theoretical framework. What he failed to realize was that this basic condition of awareness was the absolute truth and that it existed independent of any political system or framework. I would like to challenge Vernon to find any extant political or social system that could not be interpreted as having his general federalist structure. In conclusion, I would argue that the importance of federalism as a dualist system is a misconception and that all politically aware people exist and view themselves in a multi-levelled society. Vernon's ideological claims are not best represented by federalism from an individualistic, ideological, economic or political standpoint. The basic tenants of federalism, as outlined in his closing remarks are not representative of the broad political spectrum which the system crosses. I believe that for federalism to become a concrete political system would require a much closer definition of its constitutional framework. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Explain the role and importance of Federalism in the Constitutional system of government.

    of the States role: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."4 Under the 'strict constructionist' concept, there may be objections to the tasks the States have assumed, yet using

  2. Sovereignty and Democracy in the European Union.

    Britain knew the score. The 1967 White Paper explained that "The constitutional innovation would lie in the acceptance in advance, as part of the law of the UK, of provisions to be made in the future by instruments issued by the Community institutions a situation for which there is no precedent in this country."

  1. Examine the role of Gandhi in the development of Indian nationalism

    much so that it was too much of a burden on the poor peasants. So in their defensive he embarked on the Salt March. This consisted of him walking with followers from his Ashram all the way to the sea covering a huge 241 miles.

  2. Sovereignty, opinion and revolution in Edmund Burke.

    through eloquence, which is as the witchcraft of Medea, to cut the commonwealth in pieces, upon pretence or hope of reformation, which when things are in combustion, they are not able to e!ect [25, II, viii, 15; p. 141].9 R.

  1. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two philosophers who thought extensively on the subject ...

    In Utopia, More depicts a virtuous leader, and although he is a prince, is not held in a godly light as many other society?s rulers are. All of Utopia?s leaders ?live easily together, for none of the magistrates are either insolent or cruel to all people: they affect rather to

  2. Outline and Critically Assess ‘Rhodes’ Argument About ‘Hollowing Out of the State’

    main reasons behind the argument for a return to bureaucracy as a potential solution to the problems caused by hollowing out. Firstly return to balance rather than fragmentation, secondly, public sector record of delivery is as good as private sector and has better flexibility in meeting problems and challenges and

  1. History of the European Union.

    managed by the Commission, and the Court of Auditors will examine the legality and regularity of revenue and expenditure, and ensure the sound financial management of the European Unions budget. Fraud and wastage are 2 common objectives both institutions aim to eliminate.

  2. Outstanding Leader - Nelson Rolihlahala Mandela.

    He rejected the last offer of release because of a condition requiring him to renounce violence. Bowing to global and domestic pressure, Mandela was finally released on February 11, 1990 after serving for nearly 30 years in prison. Two years later, together with F.W.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work