• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do the poor only have themselves to blame for their poverty?

Extracts from this document...


Do the poor only have themselves to blame for their poverty? One of the most popular explanations in the 19th century for poverty was that the poor only have themselves to blame. It was believed if people got themselves into poverty it was their responsibility to get themselves out of it? "However, few would go as far as the 19th century sociologist Herbert Spencer and argue that any attempt by the state to alleviate poverty would lead to laziness and moral decline." Taylor, P. Richardson, J. Yeo, A. Marsh, I. Trobe, K. Pilkington, A. (1995: 182) In this essay I will be discussing the sociological explanations for the causes of poverty. There are two different types of explanations for the causes of poverty. Firstly dependency-based explanations, the argument the poor are in some way the cause of their own poverty. Secondly exclusion- based explanations, "the poor are poor because they are prevented from achieving a reasonable standard of living by the actions of the more powerful in society." Moore, S. Chapman, S. Aiken, D. (2001: 141) As mentioned earlier dependency-based explanations stress that those in poverty are there because they failed themselves or the particular social group they belonged to. Stephen Moore (1996) it is argued that people who are poor are in that state because of some personal or cultural deficiency. ...read more.


Chapman, S. Aiken, D. (2001) This argument suggests that people are not poor because of their deficiency but because they themselves are setting themselves values that are stopping them from breaking out of poverty. These values lead the poor to except their fate of poverty rather then trying to improve their lives. Lewis argues that once established, the culture of poverty "tends to perpetuate itself from generation to generation because of its effect on children. By the time slum children are age six or seven, they have usually absorbed the basic values and attitudes of their subculture and are not geared to take advantage of increased opportunities which may occur in their lifetime." O, Lewis. (1966 cited in M, Haralambos and M, Holborn 1995: 150) The final approach within the dependency-based explanations is the underclass. This approach is a more subtle development of the individual explanation. It suggests that there is a distant 'underclass' that exists of people who are lazy and make no effort to work or look after themselves. Moore, S (1996) This explanation shows how some people prefer to live off the state rather than having to work for their money. The underclass only refers to those who make no effort to help themselves, however we must accept that there are poor people who are in this state through no fault of their own. ...read more.


Moore, S. Chapman, S. Aiken, D. (2001: 142) and finally the poor providing a stating point "against which others can measure their own income rather then that of the ruling class Moore, S. Chapman, S. Aiken, D. (2001) Although this explanation suggests the poor are not to blame for their poverty like the dyswelfare view it still contrasts with the dyswelfare view because it says poverty is the result of the direct outcome of modern society. To conclude there is a huge debate over the causes of poverty and who is to blame. As mentioned earlier it is shown that some people are more in danger of being in poverty than others. Especially those individuals who are excluded from the labour market by such things as old age, disability etc. Most sociologists argue that the causes of poverty are to be found in the structure of society rather then the behavior of individuals. Taylor, P. Richardson, J. Yeo, A. Marsh, I. Trobe, K. Pilkington, A. (1995) However on the other hand the evidence above suggests that the individuals are to blame for their own poverty. Overall most evidence suggests that the welfare state plays a big in part in this and there is much evidence to suggest the welfare state does little to reduce economic inequality in society. Finally we must also consider other factors which are involved such as how poverty is actually defined and measured. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political & Economic Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political & Economic Sociology essays

  1. Poverty. This essay will give a detailed definition of poverty and will evaluate explanations ...

    These people prefer to live off the state rather than having to work. The idea of the underclass has been strongly criticised as there is little or no evidence that there is an identifiable group of people with these distinctive values, who just want to sponge off the state.

  2. Asset Based Welfare and the Enabling State. This essay intends to examine the ...

    at 80% and the same could be said of UK during the 1980s but to a lesser extent now (Doling and Roland 2010, p.170). While Singapore is not recognized nor does it wish to be categorized itself as a European-style welfare state, structurally its housing sector is comparable to other

  1. Free essay

    In what ways do definitions of poverty affect conclusions about the extent of poverty ...

    In Britain sociologist, Peter Townsend defines poverty in terms of relative deprivation as follows: "Individuals, families and groups in the population can be said to be in poverty when they lack the resources to obtain the types of diet, participate in the activities and have the living conditions and amenities

  2. Discuss the main influences in the development of social policy before 1945 with reference ...

    If they are proved to be thrifty, drunken and etc, they would be removed to the workhouse so that they learn from their mistakes and children's wouldn't be influenced from their mother's actions. (M.A CROWTHER 1981) In 1904 poor law conference renamed the 'workhouses' with the term 'state home' or

  1. Australia is a democracy. In consequence, there is no ruling class. Do you agree ...

    This all suggests the potential for control however it does not demonstrate how or if it is used (Connell 1977: 45). However it does show that there is a 'class' of people who own or control the vast majority of capital and wealth in Australia, who have the have the

  2. How and why are the Swedish and American welfare states so different?

    the era was under the control of the right wing Republican Party (Stoesz, 2009). The approach diverges considerably from that of Sweden, who actually increased the welfare state during the global recession. This highlights the attitude of both towards welfare, with Sweden perceiving it as a necessity and America as an expense.

  1. Provision of Microcredit in India. Who is the champion for the Poor in ...

    is the main promoter of SBLP, which also conducts various training for staff members from banks or NGOs[7]. Members of the SHG collectively deposit savings and members can then take turns borrowing from the Bank. The group usually first lend among themselves with the pooled savings.

  2. Discuss the differences between the concepts of poverty (relative and absolute poverty) and social ...

    and this is evident in the manner it is tackled though welfare. Despite social exclusion focusing on the lack of relationship between the individual and wider society in general the policies relating to it tend to focus more on employment and education (Blakemore and Griggs, 2007)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work