• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective is international law?

Extracts from this document...


HOW EFFECTIVE IS INTERNATIONAL LAW? International Law is the body of legal rules that apply between sovereign states, and such other bodies, which are regarded/acknowledged highly, by the international community. We know that International Law exists, as there are three main sources. These are; Treaties, Customs, and Reasons and Authority. International Law is unlike the American constitution, as it cannot be stored as one single document. It is like the British constitution, as it is very adaptable and flexible, which means it is open to change. Unlike the British constitution, International Law does not possess a legislature. This would probably make it weaker than the Britain's constitution. But the question of whether or not International Law exists, is not really a problem. The main argument is the willingness to observe and enforce it that is questioned. States give great importance to International Law. They employ, at great expense, a body of international lawyers/barristers, who work within the Foreign Commonwealth Office. Their job is to check foreign policy, and ensure that it falls in line with International Law. For example, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), actions in Kosovo was argued to be within International Law, as they were upholding resolutions by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). So if states do not take International Law seriously, then why would they spend so much money and effort on it? ...read more.


Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) may actually be making conflict less likely. But this could be proven wrong, if the US and the majority of the United Nations do decide to attack Iraq. Domestic Laws are the laws that are based in the states themselves. This usually seen as a good comparison for success. But not all of the domestic laws receive total compliance. For instance, speed limits are very often broken. Even though this does happen, domestic law is not discounted. So why should it be done with International Law? Some political commentators suggest that the pluralistic enforcement, methods used in pre-industrial societies can achieve success. It means that individuals could call upon others to achieve revenge, retribution etc. So basically 'collective security'. Also International Law has the benefits of the British constitution. So it is possible to adapt and change to suit modern conditions. So the global south (third world) views can be adopted into it. It can meet the ever-changing conditions in the international system. For example the 'War on Terrorism'. There are no enforcement mechanisms, this leads to a number of problems. As it is down to the states to enforce. Also other states will only get involved to help another state uphold International Law if it is within their own interest. Another point, is that if a powerful state is the aggressor in a situation, then who is going to confront them? ...read more.


The resources that were available for this case were ones of high quality. For instance, Britain and France gave money, the Dutch gave the Hague Security, NATO forces made the arrests and the best lawyers were willing to work on this case. But this has not always been the case. For instance, the tribunal in Rwanda. It was set-up for the murders of hundreds of thousands of people killed in Rwanda in 1994. It was based in Tanzania. Tanzania is based in the global south (a third world country). Therefore the resources that were available were atrocious. There was a lack of hotels for the lawyers and judges etc to stay in. The conference centres were not up to standard. They were behind schedule most of the time. So basically the whole thing was a farce. It seems as though International Law is only used and enforced when it suits the powerful, when they know they can win at little cost. But it is also effective. For instance the ECJ is a well-respected organisation, and has resolved issues. War Tribunal has brought the evil Milosovic to justice, and even though there are still some war criminals at large, they are indictment, which means that they on the run for the rest of life. So yes, International Law is not very effective in terms of the ICJ, but it has been successful in other areas. DAVID JACOBS HOW EFFECTIVE IS INTERNATIONAL LAW? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. Why Is the Middle East a Conflict Area?

    freedom of navigation in the Suez Canal and in the Gulf of Aqaba, and the creation of demilitarized zones. Once again Israel was able to prevail militarily despite the odds stacked against it. Following the appointment of Moshe Dayan as Defence Minister just days before the war, the Israeli armed

  2. "There is no real system of International Law - It is merely a reflection ...

    Like international relations, there should be a rule, made by world authority, for the proper regulation in controlling character or behaviour between nation-states in global society. After the end of World War II, world is in the revolution age which needs the rule in managing and organizing this confused global society.

  1. How has the success of the Extreme Right in France come about and what ...

    Moreover, they seemingly lost votes in their attempts to become as anti-immigrant as the FN (Lahav 2004 p24). Finally, it is worth considering that the main reason for the FN's success in European elections is due to the electoral system, as they gain less votes in the European Parliamentary elections

  2. Examine International Intervention in the Case of the Sierra Leonean Civil War

    The rebel held, diamond rich, areas remained a no-go area for peacekeepers and this was proven in just a matter of months as peacekeepers were kidnapped by RUF troops, who subsequently seized their weapons and used them to march on Freetown.

  1. What is more important in international mediation power or impartiality?

    The United States, in regards to Kissinger, would fall under the banner of a 'power mediator' due to the nation's international clout, but more importantly, its extensive resources both militarily and economically, which allowed the nation to have the potential to rebalance the state of affairs that surrounded the conflicting parties (Skjelsb�k, 1991: 100).

  2. Human rights and International Law. This work will briefly analyze how questionable human ...

    As the media attention of this case grew, It was obvious to all that Mr. Goldman now had the full support of the American government as H.R. 2702 was certain to be signed into law by the newly elected President Barrack Obama.

  1. EU Enlargement and Turkey

    European Parliament, the Member States, and other groups in society complement and reinforce each other. The process For half a century, the European Union has pursued ever-deeper integration while taking in new members. Most of the time, the two processes took place in parallel.

  2. Threat of Nuclear Terrorism and its implication for Western Security

    The terrorists generally seek a political agenda but also publicity, recognition, financing, etc. as a means to their political goals.7 The terrorist policy is to use violence to impose its will upon another party. According to the classic treatise by Karl von Clausewitz, On War, "It is clear that war

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work