• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The domestic power of a UK Prime Minister exceeds the domestic power of a US President.' Discuss

Extracts from this document...


'The domestic power of a UK Prime Minister exceeds the domestic power of a US President.' Discuss Both the UK Prime Minister and the US President hold the highest executive offices in their respective countries and they are the core of their governments. On the surface, it may appear that the US President, being the head of the most powerful country would hold significant power and the US presidency is often portrayed as having total power. However, this masks real limitations as the legislative and the judiciary are able to keep check on the power that is exercised. As Kennedy stated, "The President is...a man of extraordinary powers. Yet it is also true that he must wield those powers under extraordinary limitations."1 In contrast, the British Prime Minister does not have any constitutional checks upon him/her, therefore allowing them to be free to exercise the power that they desire. However, this is not entirely accurate as the British Prime minister also has some limits upon their power and it is vital for the Prime Minister to have to support of his/her Cabinet if s/he is going to govern effectively. The domestic power that a British Prime Minister holds is inextricably linked to the roles they have. These various roles act as a foundation for a power base and although many people argue we are moving towards a 'prime-ministerial ...read more.


In the UK, the monarch sits above the entire political process and in theory has many prerogative powers which could limit the Prime Minister. However, the Monarch rarely if ever intervenes in political decisions and many prerogative powers have in fact been passed down to the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister has the right to advise to Monarch on many public appointments made in the name of the crown. These are key appointments to a host of public bodies and as many depend on finding favour with the Prime Minister, it increase their power base and is a formidable aspect of Prime Ministerial power. Another role of the UK Prime Minister is to respond to questions and engage in debate in the House of Commons. The performance of the Prime Minister here can have a great effect on party morale and public opinion and therefore as a by-product, can hugely influence the amount of power that the Prime Minister has. The British executive also chairs Cabinet meetings and is expected to interpret the results of Cabinet discussions. By doing this and controlling the agenda, the Prime Minister is able to dominate by emphasising policy s/he wants to push and putting less weight on issues that are less important to them. ...read more.


However, misjudgement on the behalf of the Premier can be devastating both personally and to the party as a whole. It is clear that both the US President and the UK Prime Minister have specific powers. However, whereas the power of the Prime Minister is very flexible and can vary depending on the individual in office, the presidency does not depend on the person who holds office; The strength of the Presidency has become institutionalised. The President is granted powers directly from the Constitution but he have other resources of power which the can use. However, the ability of the President to build the supporting coalitions needed for him to capitalise on potential power has been made more difficult by the proliferation of interest groups, the weakening of political parties and the dispersion of power in congress. The increase in judicial activism constrains the President's capacity to manage the Government. In contrast, the British Prime Minister has very few formal constraints therefore s/he can do what they can get away with but ultimately they must command party loyalty and the extent and nature of their power depends on the loyalty and the support of his/her parliamentary colleagues. Therefore due to the flexibility in the British system, it seems that the British Prime Minister has more potential power than the US President where the paradox of presidentialism is executive weakness amid the appearance of strength. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Where does decision-making power lie in the British executive?

    personality; Thatcher, for one, was noted by Kenneth Baker, the Secretary of State for Education, to revel in the soubriquet, 'The Iron Lady'. Yet, the power of the Prime Minister is also institutional and contextual. The proponents of the prime ministerial model point to the many exclusive resources that the Prime Minister has access to.

  2. Critically discuss the degree to which Parliament holds the Executive accountable

    By far the greatest, potentially, form of censure is the vote of no confidence where, by convention, the executive must resign and call an election. Cases are rare but the Labour government of 1979 who had no majority lost such a vote which led to an election.


    In June 1998, a street count was conducted, and it was found that there were 1850 people sleeping rough in England on any single night, including some 620 in Greater London. From these figures the report claims that rough sleeping can be monitored and based there targets on this initiative, for reducing it down to 620 by 2002.


    However over all parliamentary questions are seen to be the most celebrated ways of calling the Prime Minister and ministers to account for their conduct of government. The way that the procedures that have been mentioned earlier function is as follows.

  1. Parliament's powers have been reduced to merely rubber-stamping the decisions made by the executive.

    Appointed interests may include leaders of back-bench committees but there is little evidence to support the idea that they contribute greatly to the policy process. Other measures are introduced due to a particular crisis (Dangerous Dog Act 1991), international agreements (Maastricht 1993)

  2. How far is it true to say that Britain has moved from a system ...

    unit, wielding power and governing as if its members were a single person exercising unlimited power. This can be applied to the Britain government whereby the Prime Minister and with the support of a few of his top cabinet ministers monopolize the whole cabinet.

  1. European Union: Council of Ministers.

    Municipalities elect their own mayors and councils. In addition, the 1982 constitution provides for a constitutional court, which reviews the constitutionality of laws passed by parliament, and a court of cessation is the final court of appeal. There are many lower civilian and military courts.

  2. Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in the UK ...

    Such social pluralism is possible, but not inevitable. It is a necessary condition for political pluralism. In addition to social pluralism, political pluralism requires the 7 Institutional Features; free and fair elections, elected officials, inclusive suffrage, right to run for office, free speech, associational autonomy and alternative sources of information.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work