• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The domestic power of a UK Prime Minister exceeds the domestic power of a US President.' Discuss

Extracts from this document...


'The domestic power of a UK Prime Minister exceeds the domestic power of a US President.' Discuss Both the UK Prime Minister and the US President hold the highest executive offices in their respective countries and they are the core of their governments. On the surface, it may appear that the US President, being the head of the most powerful country would hold significant power and the US presidency is often portrayed as having total power. However, this masks real limitations as the legislative and the judiciary are able to keep check on the power that is exercised. As Kennedy stated, "The President is...a man of extraordinary powers. Yet it is also true that he must wield those powers under extraordinary limitations."1 In contrast, the British Prime Minister does not have any constitutional checks upon him/her, therefore allowing them to be free to exercise the power that they desire. However, this is not entirely accurate as the British Prime minister also has some limits upon their power and it is vital for the Prime Minister to have to support of his/her Cabinet if s/he is going to govern effectively. The domestic power that a British Prime Minister holds is inextricably linked to the roles they have. These various roles act as a foundation for a power base and although many people argue we are moving towards a 'prime-ministerial ...read more.


In the UK, the monarch sits above the entire political process and in theory has many prerogative powers which could limit the Prime Minister. However, the Monarch rarely if ever intervenes in political decisions and many prerogative powers have in fact been passed down to the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister has the right to advise to Monarch on many public appointments made in the name of the crown. These are key appointments to a host of public bodies and as many depend on finding favour with the Prime Minister, it increase their power base and is a formidable aspect of Prime Ministerial power. Another role of the UK Prime Minister is to respond to questions and engage in debate in the House of Commons. The performance of the Prime Minister here can have a great effect on party morale and public opinion and therefore as a by-product, can hugely influence the amount of power that the Prime Minister has. The British executive also chairs Cabinet meetings and is expected to interpret the results of Cabinet discussions. By doing this and controlling the agenda, the Prime Minister is able to dominate by emphasising policy s/he wants to push and putting less weight on issues that are less important to them. ...read more.


However, misjudgement on the behalf of the Premier can be devastating both personally and to the party as a whole. It is clear that both the US President and the UK Prime Minister have specific powers. However, whereas the power of the Prime Minister is very flexible and can vary depending on the individual in office, the presidency does not depend on the person who holds office; The strength of the Presidency has become institutionalised. The President is granted powers directly from the Constitution but he have other resources of power which the can use. However, the ability of the President to build the supporting coalitions needed for him to capitalise on potential power has been made more difficult by the proliferation of interest groups, the weakening of political parties and the dispersion of power in congress. The increase in judicial activism constrains the President's capacity to manage the Government. In contrast, the British Prime Minister has very few formal constraints therefore s/he can do what they can get away with but ultimately they must command party loyalty and the extent and nature of their power depends on the loyalty and the support of his/her parliamentary colleagues. Therefore due to the flexibility in the British system, it seems that the British Prime Minister has more potential power than the US President where the paradox of presidentialism is executive weakness amid the appearance of strength. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Critically discuss the degree to which Parliament holds the Executive accountable

    Much more recently Mr. Major called a thinly veiled vote on his own government over Maastricht and won. Prospective scrutiny is in one sense much easier to define. The executive produce bills which are laid before Parliament for debate and voting.


    The select committees functions in a way that it is able to scrutinise executive away from the commons and has the power to send 'persons papers and records', that is that it could cross-examine ministers. And the final procedure is correspondence with ministers, that is that it allows the MP's

  1. How far is it true to say that Britain has moved from a system ...

    The Times Where Britain Practices Cabinet Government In Great Britain, where the cabinet system originated, it was at first a committee of the privy council and rose to its modern status only after the sovereignty of Parliament had been established by the "Glorious Revolution of 1688" 3 and the gradual emergence of party government in the 18th century.

  2. Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in the UK ...

    Today, there is a strong pluralist influence in UK politics, through multiple interest groups and trade unions. The media and newspapers represent a number of varying viewpoints in the UK, both of which have great influence over the countrys' thinking, The US is can also be seen to be pluralist


    In June 1998, a street count was conducted, and it was found that there were 1850 people sleeping rough in England on any single night, including some 620 in Greater London. From these figures the report claims that rough sleeping can be monitored and based there targets on this initiative, for reducing it down to 620 by 2002.

  2. Parliament's powers have been reduced to merely rubber-stamping the decisions made by the executive.

    and as a result of discussion with Government departments. Private members' bills (those introduced by Parliament) contribute very little in the way of legislation, in the 1987-1992 Parliament, 584 private members' bills were introduced, most were never debated and only 65 (11%)

  1. Compare and Contrast the changing roles and influence of Pressure Groups in the US ...

    Many large corporations even employ their own professional lobbyists. Some large corporations, known as 'agribusinesses', are now the main representatives of the farming industry. Small farm owners have little clout in political discussions, but the business like nature of the agribusinesses allows them far greater influence, especially in their main objective of raising farming subsidies.

  2. Are all parties now 'catch-all' parties? The UK is a prime example of Kirchheimers ...

    employers to hire and fire without too much restraint; a far more right-wing position than Old Labour would have taken. Furthermore, New Labour promised to follow Conservative spending plans for two years after winning power; an approach which seemed to accept Thatcher's tough economic policy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work