• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The South African transition from apartheid rule was hailed as one event that has defied the conventional political transitions of governments

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction The South African transition from apartheid rule was hailed as one event that has defied the conventional political transitions of governments. The perceptible leaders of the transition to a democratic bourgeois state, such as Nelson Mandela acquired so much reputation and accolades from all corners of the world for ushering in a democratic regime amidst racial, class contradictions and tensions, which typified the South African community for years of colonial and apartheid oppression. The heroic and laudable transition of South Africa should not prevent us from critically analysing and deploring the strategies, policies and decisions adopted by the South African government post apartheid. South Africa's transition from exclusionary apartheid to inclusive democratic rule was in tandem with African National Congress' (ANC) internal transition from liberation movement to government. It is perceptible that the ANC's governance and development inexperience heightened its vulnerability to manipulation and influence from both the political Left and Right. The inexperience can be discerned from ANC's earlier adoption of the Reconstruction and Development Programme (RDP, inclined to the Left) and a sudden shift to the market-oriented Growth Employment and Redistribution (GEAR). Since the introduction of GEAR, there has been a variety of views as to the consequences the macro-economic strategy would ultimately offer to the South African broader community, typified by a racially divided past. Well, this writing is destined at making attempts to discuss whether the development question, which GEAR purports to address, entails a creation of a black capitalist class, at the expense of the poor. It is instructive to note that this writing does not seek to rectify GEAR, nor arrive at the correct theory for development in South Africa. It will however make extensive reflections on how neo-liberal policies, GEAR included, widens the wealth gap and condemns the poor to abject poverty in weaker states, which in the South African scenario explains the creation of a black capitalist class through deracialisation of capital. ...read more.

Middle

Because capitalism needs cheap labour to thrive, black elites had to rely on the already super exploited working class to continue with capitalist production. Capitalism is capitalism, regardless of who controls and facilitates the system. The legislation of the black empowerment Act was tantamount to allowing for the repaint of a gun, yet continue to kill people. While the fiscal restraint "fundamentals" have been overachieved, the flows of foreign direct investment (FDI), have been exceedingly disappointing, and growth has been sluggish, touching just over 3 percent in some years, and currently around 2 percent. More disastrous, however, are the other socio-economic indicators. Over one million workers have lost their jobs in the formal sector since 1994. While current levels of unemployment are contested, no one disputes that we have an extremely serious problem. The most recent government figures, which exclude all of those who are unemployed but not currently seeking work, suggest an unemployment figure of around 27 percent5. This is but some of the conditions the South African poor and working class have to endure, whilst the black elitist few have joined white exploiters/oppressors in depriving ordinary South Africans access to wealth. Unemployment resulted perhaps from various other factors, yet GEAR is preponderantly responsible. A more recent study commissioned by Department of Labour finds that about 32 percent of the labour force is now unemployed, on the narrow definition, and fully 45 percent are unemployed if all those without work are included. South Africa remains, along with Brazil and Guatemala, the most unequal society on earth. This inequality continues to be highly racialised-average African income is 1,638 rand, while average white income is 6,131 rand. However, reflecting the rapid development of a small but not insignificant black elite, intra-"race" inequalities are now at their greatest among Africans-with top African income earners earning twenty-one times that of lowest income earners. Among whites, the top earners earn twelve times that of the lowest income earners6. ...read more.

Conclusion

* Jeremy Cronin, Post Apartheid South Africa: A Reply to John S. Saul, Monthly Review, Volume 54, Number 7. * Mesebetsi Labour Force Survey, February 2002, by the Norwegian Institute for Applied Social Science (FAFO), funded by South Africa's Department of Labour and the Norwegian Development Agency. * D. McDonald, "The Bell Tolls for Thee," D. McDonald and L. Smith, "Privatising Cape Town," Municipal Services project paper, 2002. * Adam Habib and Vishnu Padayachee, "Economic Policy and Power relations in South Africa's Transition to Democracy," World Development 28 (2000), 25 * Xolile Nqata, A response to Social emancipation and national liberation, Umrabulo issue No. 10 1st Quarter 2001 * Patrick Wadula, Erwin pleads for more time on empowerment, Business Day 1st Edition: May 10 2004. 1 Anders Aslund, How Russia Became a Market Economy (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1995), page 5. 2 P. Harris 'Exclusion, Classification and Internal Colonialism: The emergence of ethnicity among the Tsonga-speakers of South Africa' in Vail, Leroy, ed, The Creation of Tribalism in Southern Africa, London: Currey, 1989, page 102. 3 African National Congress Resolution on the National Question, Mafikeng, 1997 4 Rist, G. The History of Development: From Western Origin To Global Faith, Zed Books,, London, 1997, page 1. 5 Jeremy Cronin, Post Apartheid South Africa: A Reply to John S. Saul, Monthly Review, Volume 54, Number 7. Accessible on http://www.monthlyreview.org/1202cronin.htm 6 See the Mesebetsi Labor Force Survey, February 2002, by the Norwegian Institute for Applied Social Science (FAFO), funded by South Africa's Department of Labor and the Norwegian Development Agency. 7 D. McDonald, "The Bell Tolls for Thee," D. McDonald and L. Smith, "Privatising Cape Town," Municipal Services project paper, 2002. 8 Adam Habib and Vishnu Padayachee, "Economic Policy and Power relations in South Africa's Transition to Democracy," World Development 28 (2000), 25 9 Xolile Nqata, A response to Social emancipation and national liberation, Umrabulo issue No. 10 1st Quarter 2001. Accessible on http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/pubs/umrabulo/umrabulo13t.html 10 Patrick Wadula, Erwin pleads for more time on empowerment, Business Day 1st Edition: May 10 2004. Accessible on http://www.businessday.co.za/bday/content/direct/1,3523,1611919-6094-0,00.html 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Human & Social Geography section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Human & Social Geography essays

  1. To what extent is the west to blame for the failure of the global ...

    Therefore this means that these countries have to do everything in their power and be non negotiable with terms which the countries giving aid have when it comes to taking the aid from them. "The North South terms of trade involves both aid itself and the tying of aid to purchases of exports from the donating developed countries"4.

  2. The Church's Struggle Against Apartheid

    This marked the permanent segregation of South Africa into areas designated for white or black ownership. 'The unmentioned purpose of the 1913 Land Act is to confine the Black man within such circumscribed limits that he should never be territorially independent ' (Martin Prozesky)

  1. Who Benefits From Neo-Liberal Globalization?

    increased thirty-four per cent in Africa, and seventy-three per cent in Latin America.30 "Structural adjustment seems bound to push Latin Americans' remarkable capacity for suffering to new extremes."31 The IMF and the World Bank commonly use Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

  2. Homelessness. Of course poverty is just a general effect from the corporate capitalist ...

    The average pay of Bangladeshi men and Black African women is almost 21% lower than the average pay of White British men, while the gap for Black African men and Bangladeshi women is almost 18%" 4 In this case it is undeniable that ethnics are facing discrimination to some extent

  1. disabled service user

    The information is shared to ensure the care meets the standards expected. The monitoring records all the information, and finally Reviewing ensuring that the services remain relevant to needs and evaluating their quality. Review starts with the views of the service user and carers on the progress that has been achieved in reaching the objectives stated in the care plan.

  2. Investigate the Factors that Determine the Well-Being of Africans Today

    The concord takes a rounded approach and includes a broad assortment of anti-corruption policies oscillating from good governance and organizational reform to the contribution of civil society. Its four posts - deterrence, illegalisation, asset repossession and international collaboration serve to promote exposed, candid and effectual decision-making, reasonable competition and principled procurement schemes, supporting effective Government development strategies.

  1. Experiences of Life as an Immigrant. Cross-cultural analysis of Eva Hoffman "Lost in Translation"

    ?We do not use stereotypes in an undiscriminating or unthinking way; rather, they serve as a tentative for which we then seek out further information?[12]. This means that Eva is aware of the differences between her own culture and the other one but she is not ready to accept it due to the lack of knowledge.

  2. The process of globalization and its impact on agriculture in Africa.

    In the past, price-distorting policies havegradually changed from disfavouring to favouring agriculture relative to other tradable sectors as per capita incomes grow (Anderson 2009); globally, productivity growth has been faster in the farm sector than in other sectors (Martin & Mitra 2001).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work