Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9

What are the arguments for and against the state taking on responsibility for social welfare?

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

What are the arguments for and against the state taking on responsibility for social welfare? The different arguments for and against the state taking on responsibility for social welfare have been powerfully put across by people of opposing political persuasions in Britain over the last 60 years. In this essay, therefore, I intend to use Britain's welfare state to exemplify arguments for and against the state taking primary responsibility for social welfare. The welfare state in Britain was introduced in 1945 by the newly elected Labour government. Although this was the first comprehensive attempt at creating a functional welfare state it is important to note that it was not an entirely new policy. In fact, we can trace back to 1601 to find an early attempt at implementing a state welfare provision - the Poor Law. The theory behind this legislation was that the poor were to be categorized into the deserving ("the impotent poor") and the undeserving ("the persistent idlers"). There were many obvious flaws in the methodology and logic in the implementation of the Poor Law but it must be recognised that this was an early attempt at providing a social welfare system. This demonstrates that for hundreds of years a case has been made for some measure of state social welfare provision. It is also vital not to underestimate the impact the studies carried out by social researchers such as Rowntree (1901) and Booth (1902)

Middle

Probably the most notable change in policy brought in by the New Right was the end of the commitment to full employment that previous governments had encouraged. The New Right believed in a "natural level of employment". They felt that this "natural level of employment" was being undermined by wages being too high due to the actions of trade unions. Therefore, they argued that the market would solve unemployment by creating downward pressure on wages. Because of this, the differential between wages and benefits was increased by creating downward pressure on benefit levels and therefore welfare expenditure. However, despite this right wing shift in political thinking, there was no major change in welfare expenditure until the late 1980's. The year 1988 was an important one in terms of implications for the welfare state as it represented a far more radical application of New Right thinking towards the welfare state. Firstly, the New Right introduced a shift from the previous system of universal provision towards a system based more upon selective provision. For example, some of the benefits that were previously available to everyone (universal) became only available to some via a "means test" (selective). This was a big move that completely contradicted the universal method employed by previous more left wing governments. Another change made by the New Right was the introduction of privatization and marketization. An example of this is the case of the sale of council houses.

Conclusion

It is also suggested that due to financial restrictions the voluntary sector will never be anything more than a secondary level service that relies on the state or private sector provision. Social security benefits are the most redistributive aspect of the welfare state as they distribute income to the poorest people in the country. A point in favour of a social welfare system, from a socialist or social democratic perspective, is that the social security benefits can be used to redistribute wealth to make society economically fairer by heavily taxing the rich and giving it to the poorest people in society. On the other hand, opponents see this as a Robin Hood aspect of state social welfare which demotivates both the richest and the poorest people in the country - encouraging idleness (one of the "five giants" beveridge was trying to eradicate) amongst the poor and encouraging the rich to leave the country. The New Right when in power, therefore, cut back on the redistributive aspects of welfare provision. The one-off grant system that was previously in effect was replaced in the 1986 and 1988 security acts and 16 to 18 year olds entitlement to income support was revoked. In current political debates the Conservative party, now in opposition frequently accuse the Labour party of redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor via "underhand" or "stealthy" methods. This is an indication that the argument about the extent to which the state should take responsibility for social welfare remains highly contested. Where you stand on this issue is fundamental to your political beliefs and how you will vote.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related University Degree Social Work

  1. Student number: 0373390

    For example Goldberg et al (1977) found that task-centred method used by case workers increased the '...social skills of their clients so that they feel capable of applying directly for resources and services without needing the social worker to intervene as an agent or advocate' (Goldberg, E.M. et al, 1977:14).

  2. To what extent does the welfare state still fulfil its original aim of providing ...

    In contrast the workers received the new welfare laws heartily as they would benefit accordingly. In practice the belief that the Welfare Sate could provide care for all from 'cradle to grave' is one that can be easily contested. The Welfare State is open to all those who are citizens of Britain or France in their respective countries.

  1. To What Extent Does New Labour Have a New and Distinctive Approach to Welfare

    began a thorough review of past policy priorities, which led to a rebranding of the party as New Labour and a rejection of many of the state welfare commitments of past Labour governments. Revulsion against the visible decline of the welfare state under the Conservative's was part of the reason why millions voted Labour in May 1997.

  2. 'The British welfare regime has been profoundly shaped by ideological assumptions about family, work ...

    However, during the 1960s a series of challenges emerged from various quarters. Welfare users and their advocates, as well as social movements representing women, ethnic minorities and the disabled, criticized the discriminatory and oppressive policies and practices of state welfare, and the principle of 'universalism' was exposed to be, in practice, highly selective (ibid).

  1. Decision Managing and risk taking.

    It is also important to consider the society and environment in which Delia grew up as she could have learned these behaviours from someone such as her parents, therefore this may lead to a different form of intervention. Different levels of client involvement Each service user can have different levels of involvement for a variety of reasons.

  2. Should the way in which taxes and charges areleviedto pay for social welfare systems ...

    This inevitably leads to discontent among those, (the middle-class), who increasingly see their taxes spent on others, (the poor) creating class tensions and calls for tax and public service retrenchment by the now dominant middle-class. Secondly, as the service sector develops and a society becomes wealthier people's expectations of welfare

  1. The criticisms made against William Beveridge by the feminist movement have, by-and-large, not been ...

    However, if we then review Thomas Humphrey Marshall's (1893-1981) theory of citizenship, the picture becomes somewhat less clear. Marshall states that citizenship actually has: ...three parts, or elements, civil, political and social. The civil element is composed of the rights necessary for individual freedom - liberty of the person, freedom of speech, thought and faith, the right to own

  2. "The social welfare response to HIV/AIDS was, and remains fundamentally inadequate". Discuss

    However, the Griffiths Report in 1983 stating "the NHS needs the ability to move much more quickly for any medical problem" [Ferlie and Pettigrew 1990:197] relates to the principle that the slow response could simply be due to systems failure and not prejudice or discrimination.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.