• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the arguments for and against the state taking on responsibility for social welfare?

Extracts from this document...


What are the arguments for and against the state taking on responsibility for social welfare? The different arguments for and against the state taking on responsibility for social welfare have been powerfully put across by people of opposing political persuasions in Britain over the last 60 years. In this essay, therefore, I intend to use Britain's welfare state to exemplify arguments for and against the state taking primary responsibility for social welfare. The welfare state in Britain was introduced in 1945 by the newly elected Labour government. Although this was the first comprehensive attempt at creating a functional welfare state it is important to note that it was not an entirely new policy. In fact, we can trace back to 1601 to find an early attempt at implementing a state welfare provision - the Poor Law. The theory behind this legislation was that the poor were to be categorized into the deserving ("the impotent poor") and the undeserving ("the persistent idlers"). There were many obvious flaws in the methodology and logic in the implementation of the Poor Law but it must be recognised that this was an early attempt at providing a social welfare system. This demonstrates that for hundreds of years a case has been made for some measure of state social welfare provision. It is also vital not to underestimate the impact the studies carried out by social researchers such as Rowntree (1901) and Booth (1902) ...read more.


Probably the most notable change in policy brought in by the New Right was the end of the commitment to full employment that previous governments had encouraged. The New Right believed in a "natural level of employment". They felt that this "natural level of employment" was being undermined by wages being too high due to the actions of trade unions. Therefore, they argued that the market would solve unemployment by creating downward pressure on wages. Because of this, the differential between wages and benefits was increased by creating downward pressure on benefit levels and therefore welfare expenditure. However, despite this right wing shift in political thinking, there was no major change in welfare expenditure until the late 1980's. The year 1988 was an important one in terms of implications for the welfare state as it represented a far more radical application of New Right thinking towards the welfare state. Firstly, the New Right introduced a shift from the previous system of universal provision towards a system based more upon selective provision. For example, some of the benefits that were previously available to everyone (universal) became only available to some via a "means test" (selective). This was a big move that completely contradicted the universal method employed by previous more left wing governments. Another change made by the New Right was the introduction of privatization and marketization. An example of this is the case of the sale of council houses. ...read more.


It is also suggested that due to financial restrictions the voluntary sector will never be anything more than a secondary level service that relies on the state or private sector provision. Social security benefits are the most redistributive aspect of the welfare state as they distribute income to the poorest people in the country. A point in favour of a social welfare system, from a socialist or social democratic perspective, is that the social security benefits can be used to redistribute wealth to make society economically fairer by heavily taxing the rich and giving it to the poorest people in society. On the other hand, opponents see this as a Robin Hood aspect of state social welfare which demotivates both the richest and the poorest people in the country - encouraging idleness (one of the "five giants" beveridge was trying to eradicate) amongst the poor and encouraging the rich to leave the country. The New Right when in power, therefore, cut back on the redistributive aspects of welfare provision. The one-off grant system that was previously in effect was replaced in the 1986 and 1988 security acts and 16 to 18 year olds entitlement to income support was revoked. In current political debates the Conservative party, now in opposition frequently accuse the Labour party of redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor via "underhand" or "stealthy" methods. This is an indication that the argument about the extent to which the state should take responsibility for social welfare remains highly contested. Where you stand on this issue is fundamental to your political beliefs and how you will vote. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Work section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Work essays

  1. To What Extent Does New Labour Have a New and Distinctive Approach to Welfare

    The idea behind New Labour's new approach is rooted in the report of the Commission on Social Justice (1994). The report set out a preferred alternative to the traditional approaches, the 'middle way' of 'Investor's Britain' (Powell, 2000). An Investor's welfare state is proactive, emphasising prevention, and stressing causes rather

  2. Decision Managing and risk taking.

    The levels of involvement are: * Being told - This is the lowest form of involvement * Being consulted - This is where your opinions will be appreciated but not greatly considered in the final outcome * Being a partner - this is a high level of involvement and means

  1. Provide an overview of the feminist perspective on welfare provision. What reforms are suggested ...

    Therefore, the position of unsupported mothers was unchanged by the report, 'and they were essentially in the same position they were under the poor laws' (Wilson, 1977, p 152). Furthermore, Beveridge was concerned with the falling birth rate and therefore anxious to get working/service women back into the home.

  2. Student number: 0373390

    A maximum of three problems should be worked on. Too 'many selected problems will probably lead to confusion and dissipated effort' (Doel and Marsh, 1992:31). Having selected the problem(s) the worker then finds out what the SU wants to happen, what goal(s)

  1. Should the way in which taxes and charges areleviedto pay for social welfare systems ...

    "Successive decades of under investment have weakened the public welfare services to the point of near collapse and it is unsurprising that chronic under funding shortages and inefficiencies have become commonplace."5 This has led many, those who can afford it, to pursue private welfare provision, creating a two-tier service structure.

  2. To what extent does the welfare state still fulfil its original aim of providing ...

    This is very much similar to the provision provided by the British welfare state. The primary objective of this scheme was to provide a security from the government for those who were incapable of protecting themselves from possible future economic or social crisis.

  1. understanding welfare

    However this arrangement was actually designed to prevent older people choosing a care home which the public would pay for without being assessed, therefore it could be argued that this arrangement actually created less choice. The role of the care manager is to carry out an assessment of the individual,

  2. The criticisms made against William Beveridge by the feminist movement have, by-and-large, not been ...

    the position or status of being a citizen, with its rights and privileges. This definition of citizenship appears simple enough and implies that individuals have certain universal rights, privileges and protection offered to them by inhabiting a specific area. However, if we then review Thomas Humphrey Marshall's (1893-1981)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work