• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the arguments for and against the state taking on responsibility for social welfare?

Extracts from this document...


What are the arguments for and against the state taking on responsibility for social welfare? The different arguments for and against the state taking on responsibility for social welfare have been powerfully put across by people of opposing political persuasions in Britain over the last 60 years. In this essay, therefore, I intend to use Britain's welfare state to exemplify arguments for and against the state taking primary responsibility for social welfare. The welfare state in Britain was introduced in 1945 by the newly elected Labour government. Although this was the first comprehensive attempt at creating a functional welfare state it is important to note that it was not an entirely new policy. In fact, we can trace back to 1601 to find an early attempt at implementing a state welfare provision - the Poor Law. The theory behind this legislation was that the poor were to be categorized into the deserving ("the impotent poor") and the undeserving ("the persistent idlers"). There were many obvious flaws in the methodology and logic in the implementation of the Poor Law but it must be recognised that this was an early attempt at providing a social welfare system. This demonstrates that for hundreds of years a case has been made for some measure of state social welfare provision. It is also vital not to underestimate the impact the studies carried out by social researchers such as Rowntree (1901) and Booth (1902) ...read more.


Probably the most notable change in policy brought in by the New Right was the end of the commitment to full employment that previous governments had encouraged. The New Right believed in a "natural level of employment". They felt that this "natural level of employment" was being undermined by wages being too high due to the actions of trade unions. Therefore, they argued that the market would solve unemployment by creating downward pressure on wages. Because of this, the differential between wages and benefits was increased by creating downward pressure on benefit levels and therefore welfare expenditure. However, despite this right wing shift in political thinking, there was no major change in welfare expenditure until the late 1980's. The year 1988 was an important one in terms of implications for the welfare state as it represented a far more radical application of New Right thinking towards the welfare state. Firstly, the New Right introduced a shift from the previous system of universal provision towards a system based more upon selective provision. For example, some of the benefits that were previously available to everyone (universal) became only available to some via a "means test" (selective). This was a big move that completely contradicted the universal method employed by previous more left wing governments. Another change made by the New Right was the introduction of privatization and marketization. An example of this is the case of the sale of council houses. ...read more.


It is also suggested that due to financial restrictions the voluntary sector will never be anything more than a secondary level service that relies on the state or private sector provision. Social security benefits are the most redistributive aspect of the welfare state as they distribute income to the poorest people in the country. A point in favour of a social welfare system, from a socialist or social democratic perspective, is that the social security benefits can be used to redistribute wealth to make society economically fairer by heavily taxing the rich and giving it to the poorest people in society. On the other hand, opponents see this as a Robin Hood aspect of state social welfare which demotivates both the richest and the poorest people in the country - encouraging idleness (one of the "five giants" beveridge was trying to eradicate) amongst the poor and encouraging the rich to leave the country. The New Right when in power, therefore, cut back on the redistributive aspects of welfare provision. The one-off grant system that was previously in effect was replaced in the 1986 and 1988 security acts and 16 to 18 year olds entitlement to income support was revoked. In current political debates the Conservative party, now in opposition frequently accuse the Labour party of redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor via "underhand" or "stealthy" methods. This is an indication that the argument about the extent to which the state should take responsibility for social welfare remains highly contested. Where you stand on this issue is fundamental to your political beliefs and how you will vote. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Work section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Work essays

  1. Should the way in which taxes and charges areleviedto pay for social welfare systems ...

    Thirdly, the number of 'non-working' people, (those who exist on benefits but are unable to work, either through illness, family circumstances or institutionalization) in the UK has been steadily increasing for 50 years; now outnumbering the standard unemployed, (those 'actively seeking work'), by nearly two to one creating an ever-increasing

  2. Student number: 0373390

    The steps between problem and goal are: 1. Preparation. 2. Exploring problems 3. Agreeing goal and time limit 4. Tasks 5. Ending the work and evaluation. The initial phase of task-centred practice is problem exploration. During this phrase key problems are identified, and then prioritised.

  1. 'The British welfare regime has been profoundly shaped by ideological assumptions about family, work ...

    their husbands, together with a steadily growing number of women in paid employment, challenged the gender norms of the post-war period. Lone parent families, including many from the ethnic Afro-Caribbean community, and a steady increase in the numbers of elderly women living alone, laid bare the assumption of the 'ideal' nuclear family.

  2. To What Extent Does New Labour Have a New and Distinctive Approach to Welfare

    of the welfare state by limiting the direct provision of welfare by state institutions. They did this by trying to separate purchasers of services from providers and by allowing schools and hospitals to manage themselves rather than be managed by local or health authorities.

  1. To what extent does the welfare state still fulfil its original aim of providing ...

    A stealthy aim was to also provide a more equitable distribution of the National wealth and thus indirectly increase wages. Employers throughout France "accepted the plans with a gloomy resignation" (Dupeux 1976), with the realisation that there was a negative correlation between the cost of welfare and the level of salaries that would need to be paid.

  2. "The social welfare response to HIV/AIDS was, and remains fundamentally inadequate". Discuss

    However, the Griffiths Report in 1983 stating "the NHS needs the ability to move much more quickly for any medical problem" [Ferlie and Pettigrew 1990:197] relates to the principle that the slow response could simply be due to systems failure and not prejudice or discrimination.

  1. The criticisms made against William Beveridge by the feminist movement have, by-and-large, not been ...

    However, if we then review Thomas Humphrey Marshall's (1893-1981) theory of citizenship, the picture becomes somewhat less clear. Marshall states that citizenship actually has: ...three parts, or elements, civil, political and social. The civil element is composed of the rights necessary for individual freedom - liberty of the person, freedom of speech, thought and faith, the right to own

  2. Outline what is meant by the two strands of British conservatism and consider whether ...

    are dangerous as they entail authoritarian measures which will crush individual liberty and social hierarch is desirable because the majority will benefit from the leadership of the few. Because conservatives prefer tradition they do not have any illusion that future times can eliminate imperfections of human arrangements, in contrast with their ideological adversaries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work