Hope and Death; the eternal struggle of reality vs. idealism and its consequences in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich and Madame Bovary.

Authors Avatar

Hope and Death; the eternal struggle of reality vs. idealism and its consequences in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich and Madame Bovary.

Flaubert has referred to Madame Bovary as “an exercise in style” as he thought the actual subjects he was writing about; in this being the people, the story, the locations; were not pivotal and that the only way to redeem the book was by making it into a great work of art. He wanted to be different from the hopeless romantics of his time that idealized life in every way.  He did this by trying to bridge the gap between form and content, by attempting to make the words he used merge with the things he was describing. To do this, he searched almost fanatically for the "mot juste," the uniquely perfect word. That is, every word had to be exactly right to reveal the essence of the thing being described. The end result of this laborious process was the masterpiece that is known the world over today as Gustave Flaubert’s Madame Bovary.  

The key theme of One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich is the survival of the fittest in man’s struggle for existence. Within the Siberian labor camp, life is as difficult as it gets. From early morning to late in the evening, the prisoners must perform hard labor and exist on meager rations. They are expected to work in the sub freezing weather without adequate clothing or footgear. In addition, they are constantly taunted and abused by the guards and officials, being treated more like numbers or animals than human beings. If they fail to follow orders, they are severely punished. To exist in the camp requires a sturdy constitution, cunning resourcefulness, an iron will, and a positive attitude about life. Men like Ivan, Tyurin, Kilgas, Gopchik, and Y-81 succeed in their struggle for existence because they possess strong characters. They are proud and positive, taking their hardships in stride and living one day at a time. They do not bear grudges or covet the possessions of other. They are also appreciative of small mercies and grateful for little rewards, like extra rations. Because of their outlook, they are able to pass through their life of struggle. In contrast, characters like Captain Buynovsky, Caesar, and Fetyukov are misfits in the labor camp. They are unable to adjust to their surroundings and come to terms with their situation. They do not understand that they have to struggle hard and live positively in order to survive the harsh conditions of the camp. They spend their time resenting their present situation and complaining about it.

Join now!

Flaubert described Madame Bovary as "a work of anatomy." In fact, Flaubert's father was a doctor which meant that Flaubert spent much of his childhood in a very sterile and controlled hospital environment. The precision with which Flaubert brings his characters and their surroundings to life is in many ways like the work of a doctor. And like a cautious doctor, he tries to stick to the objective, concrete facts about his characters in their setting that will reveal their essence. Flaubert uses description of physical things; clothes, food, buildings, nature, and carriage rides; as another dimension of his story. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay