This article compares the 'The Longest Day' directed by Andrew Martin with 'Saving Private Ryan' that was directed by Steven Spielberg.

Authors Avatar

This article compares the ‘The Longest Day’ directed by Andrew Martin with ‘Saving Private Ryan’ that was directed by Steven Spielberg.

These two directors were trying to achieve different goals, ‘The Longest Day’ was made post-war in 1962 and when the war may still of been in peoples thoughts and where many of the people who fought in the war would still be alive.  However ‘Saving Private Ryan’ was made much later on in 1999, by then the world has gladly put this terrible event behind it.  Steven Spielberg is not as biased because his audience now do not have the same attitude as in 1962, only 17 years after the war.

I feel the aim of Andrew Martin was to achieve a film America would be proud of showing it in its full glory and might.  I think this because of the fact that the soldiers who fought would still be alive so to honour them as well.

Steven Spielberg’s aim is totally contrasting, he is very much anti-war and his film is made far more realistic then the invulnerable soldiers in ‘The Longest Day’.  He also now has the ability to use many modern features for example sophisticated special effects.  Both of the films were very good in there time because the directors made what the audience wanted.

Join now!

The differences between the two films are shown clearly in the beach landing scenes.  Both scenes show the same historic event, the Omaha beach landing in 1944.  However, the way the two directors depict this event highlights the way Hollywood’s portrayal of war has changed.  The first shot of Robert Mitchum’s character in ‘The Longest Day’ shows him standing above the rest of the soldier, this straight away shows him as in control and a superior officer.  Tom Hanks character when we first see him with his men he is much more human and vulnerable for example his hand ...

This is a preview of the whole essay