• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"A common ideology was the single most important factor in drawing Mussolini and Hitler into an alliance"

Extracts from this document...


"A common ideology was the single most important factor in drawing Mussolini and Hitler into an alliance" How far do you agree with this assessment of n**i-Fascist relations in the period 1933-39? Italian foreign policy became increasingly expansionist in the 1930s, aiming not only at control of the Mediterranean, but also at an African empire and from 1935 onwards Mussolini behaved in every way like an expansionist power. In the process, Mussolini committed Italy to an alliance with Germany. From the mid-1930s Hitler and Mussolini became increasingly closer, eventually drawing into alliance during the Second World War. The connection between Italy and Germany was formalized by the Rome-Berlin Axis; a term first used by Mussolini in a speech in November 1936. The axis allowed them to accommodate each others expansionist ambitions. The alliance was further tightened by Italy signing the Anti-Commintern Pact with Germany and Japan also in 1936, and the 1939 Pact of Steel which committed Germany and Italy to mutual support in any offensive or defensive war. Throughout this period Mussolini and Hitler shared a common ideology. Both dictators had expansionist aims, and an ambitious wish for imperial aggrandisement. Both dictatorships were very militaristic and nationalistic, with a similar hatred for socialism. ...read more.


A German alliance became increasingly attractive to Mussolini as Hitler boldly dismantled the settlement piece by piece. Therefore it is arguable that their expansionist and revisionist ideology brought Mussolini and Hitler together. Mussolini and Hitler's joint yearning for worldwide fascism also brought the leaders together; as they both believed that Europe's future lay with Fascism, nationalism and right-wing militarism. Mussolini hoped to synchronize his own ideology with Hitler's Nazism in order to produce a 'century of Fascism'. The involvement in the Spanish Civil War was motivated partly by this ideology; both leaders shared an obsessive hatred of socialism, and Mussolini argued that he could not allow a Communist government to be formed in the Mediterranean. By helping Franco overrule the socialists in Spain; Hitler knew that it would mean the Soviet Union would loose Spain as a potential ally, and that the international political climate would be dominated by fascism. The outbreak of the Spanish Civil War further accelerated Italo-German rapprochement and Hitler not only saw the civil war as a means of testing his newly rearmed military and air force, but as a way to get closer to Italy. The outcome of the Spanish Civil War led to a major change in international relations: France and Britain drew closer together, and an alliance between these democracies and Italy was now made impossible. ...read more.


France's political system was forever changing, and the country saw a change of government four times in 1933. Another important point to consider relating to the democracies was that they were very against Italian expansionism. Britain and France had numerous colonies in Africa, but denied Mussolini Abyssinia. This consequently drew Germany and Italy closer together. Throughout this time period, Mussolini wavered between an alliance with Britain and France, and an alliance with Germany. He played the democracies off each other, in order to benefit his expansionist aims. It should not be disputed that Mussolini and Hitler's common ideology was a highly important part of the alliance between Italy and Germany. I would agree with the statement that it was the Fascist ideology that drew the two nations together into eventual alliance, as both leaders held many similar ideologues, such as expansionism, imperial aggrandisement and a hatred for socialism. However there were other extremely important factors that must be considered such as the military and political advantages for both countries, and the personal relationship between the two leaders. A shared ideology was singly very important, but alone it could not have drawn the countries together. No countries draw together based purely on common ideology, there must always be economic, military or foreign policy benefits. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Students memorized set speeches and rehearsed answers to questions in front of mirrors. Two thousand speakers were trained in 1929 and 1930 alone. The program was expanded with the establishment by Fritz Reinhardt of a correspondence school. Students memorized a simple speech written by Reinhardt, who also corrected speeches written by the students themselves.


    According to Hitler, the ideal war was one of conquest, extermination, and suppression; the ideal area in which to conduct such a war was in the east, where the German people would win for itself the Lebensraum, necessary for its moral and racial purity, as well as for its ultimate

  1. How successfully did the Nazis impose their ideology on German women?

    n**i policy towards women was largely reactionary. The Nazis wanted to reverse many of the recent trends that had increased opportunities for women throughout Europe, such as increased female employment in the non-agricultural sector and a declining birth rate that was partly due to wider access to contraception.

  2. To what extent is Fascism a single doctrine?

    Influenced by Nietzsche's idea of the "Ubermensch", the "over-man", both Hitler and Mussolini believed that a uniquely gifted individual would rise up and awaken the people to their destiny. His authority is therefore unlimited. In this way the phrase "Adolf Hitler is Germany, Germany is Adolf Hitler" was rigorously chanted

  1. Can historical parallels be drawn between democracies and dictatorships?

    who had blindly submitted to his unconscious "Germanic" inclination to abdicate personal responsibility in favour of the following the "mass": the result of which was an unforeseen destruction, but more important perhaps, the annihilation of over half of Jewish community.

  2. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    The government was only in power for a few months. The quotation is interesting because how can something fall when it has so little power and was there for so little time then how could it be classed as falling.

  1. Mussolini is considered as one of the most important European dictators of the twenties ...

    This seemed to have saved Mussolini from major strikes, which could have been the end of his quite fragile party. Mussolini even if he was the leader of the party he still needed it to keep him in power. When he was forced to leave in 1941 it was not

  2. To what extent were the German and Italian regimes under Hitler and Mussolini Totalitarian?

    of the individual in common. The difference between them, however is that Totalitarian is purely a term describing a situation, a current state of something. Nazism and Fascism on the other hand, describe an ideology that developed over centuries and eventually ruled a country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work