The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the weakness of the Provisional Government. How far do you agree with this view?

Authors Avatar by olliep (student)

Oliver Perretta

The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in October 1917 mainly because of the weakness of the Provisional Government. How far do you agree with this view?

In the long term, it can be said that the weakness of the Provisional government was one of the main reasons that allowed the Bolsheviks to seize power in October 1917, the fact that they were weak and unpopular meant that nobody was prepared to defend it when it was attacked. They gave no hope of change and had unpopular policies towards war; it can also be argued that the failure of Kerensky’s offensive, dealing with the land question and Kornilov’s attempted coup was crucial to its fate. However, as well as the weak government, the strengths of the Bolsheviks also contributed to their rise to power. The Bolsheviks were brilliantly organised, they had masterly executed the coup d’état and had skilfully aligned itself with the demands of the workers and peasants. The Bolsheviks also had good slogans such as ‘Peace, Bread, Land’ and ‘All Power to the Soviets’. Other parties claimed that they would never carry out their promises, but their arguments were too complicated for people to understand, so this gained support for the Bolsheviks. To get across their ideas and slogans, the Bolsheviks also had their own newspaper, the ‘Pravda’ which was a propaganda machine, which gained them their support. They also had their own private army, the Red Guards, led by Trotsky and dedicated to revolution; this gave them the military power to win. Finally To tie this all together the Bolsheviks had a great leader, Lenin, a professional revolutionary and a good planner with one aim, to overthrow the government. Lenin was financed by Germans as they knew that he wanted to take Russia out of the war.  This gave them the money to mount their publicity campaigns.

The provisional government were formed on the 2nd of March after the abdication of the Tsar as a result of the February revolution; they had the job of ruling Russia until a Constituent Assembly could be formed. One of the major weaknesses of the Provisional government was its lack of credibility and authority. For the masses of Russian people the provisional government did not bring immediate change. They were unable to distinguish themselves from the government of the Tsar; in fact many in the government were also in the government of the Tsar including the leader, Prince Lvov, Milyukov, Leader of the Kadets and Kerensky, war minister. There were terrible conditions in Russia i.e inflation and hunger because the war still hadn’t ended and the government did nothing to stop this and the people did not notice a difference, or a change in their lives which made the government very unpopular. As well as this the Provisional government were also very weak compared with the Petrograd soviet. The Soviets had a better claim to legitimacy as it had been formed from representatives of the workers. It then expanded its base to include soldiers. The Soviet had control over postal service and railways in Petrograd, and it was getting to the point that the Provisional government couldn’t do anything without its support. This was illustrated by Order number 1 which urged soldiers to only obey the orders of the government if they didn’t contradict its own decrees. However the Soviets were not initially Hostile, Indeed within the first couple of months, there was a lot of cooperation between them and there were no serious disputes between the two bodies in the dual authority.

Join now!

Although the weakness of the Provisional Government and lack of support of the masses had given the Bolsheviks an advantage, another factor that bought the Bolsheviks to seize power was their organisation and use of effective slogans to gain support from the industrial workers, peasantry and soldiers. The role of the soldiers was very important, especially after the inclusion of their key representatives in the soviets. Although there is evidence that patriotism remained a strong force amongst front line troops, those stations in radicals were particularly radical. They wanted to see the end of war with Germany, and as ...

This is a preview of the whole essay