• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This case is about the disagreement between Simpsons Ltd v Thowers Ltd. The carrier's liabilities will be discussed in three parts, firstly to resolve the problem, I am going to give a short description of the main components of the contract of carriag...

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

This case is about the disagreement between Simpsons Ltd v Thowers Ltd. The carrier's liabilities will be discussed in three parts, firstly to resolve the problem, I am going to give a short description of the main components of the contract of carriage of goods by sea Act 1971, secondly I will decide which of the Hague Visby rules or the Common law is applicable, and to finish I am going to apply the rules in looking for the liabilities of the carrier by searching the duties and the defences of the carrier for each good. I) What is the contract "Carriage of Goods by Sea?" Firstly, we have to check whether the case is governed by "the carriage of goods by sea", or not and Secondly, whether Simpsons and Thowers satisfy all the conditions of Carriage of Goods by Sea. When we are looking at the definition of the contract, the contract stipulates that: ( JCT Chuah, 7-01, p201) * The contract of carriage must be covered by a bill of lading or any similar document of title. * The carriage of goods is from a port in a contracting state. In the case, we know that the contract was covered by two bills of lading. ...read more.

Middle

The carrier and the shipper are free to negotiate their own terms of carriage subject only to the operation of the common law.( JCT Chauh, p 273, 8-11). Art 1(c) Rules are satisfied only if: * The cargo must actually be stowed on deck * The bill of lading states clearly that this is indeed the case Moreover in the case law Svenska Traktor, Aktiebolaget v Maritime Agency (Southampton) ltd. (1953) it was stated that: "A mere general liberty to carry goods on deck is not, in my view, a statement in the contract of carriage that goods are in fact, being carrying on deck. To hold otherwise would, in my view, do violence to the ordinary meaning of the words of art. I (c). I accordingly, hold that the ... tractors were being carried by the [ship owners] subject to the obligations imposed on them by art. III, r. 2 of the Act" (ER Hardy Ivamy, 1977, p51). In this case the Hague Visby rules do apply. III) What is the liability of the carrier for each product? I will look at the carrier's duties and defences. A) What is the liability of the carrier for the loss of five containers of engine parts? ...read more.

Conclusion

Whereas Colinvaux ( 1971,p92) remember that: "Unseaworthiness must cause loss but the carrier will only be responsible if unfitness of the ship "becomes a real cause of loss or damage to the cargo". This fact has been supported by the judgement of the case Tanner v Benneh. For this case the court of appeal that "not with standing an exception of negligence, the ship owner was responsible for the whole of the damage. The carrier could also try to use defences of the carrier due to the negligence of the ship management, who "left a cargo open after an occasional routine inspection". The management of the ship relates to those things done for the safety of the ship. It was not the case which is why the crew still made a mistake. Also the case law Smith, Hogg v Black sea and Baltic general insurance, the court of appeal ( Lord Wright) affirmed the decision that : "the owners were liable whether the master was negligent or not, the ship was Unseaworthy and the Unseaworthiness was a cause of the damage. Conclusion Obviously, the carrier has breached his duties in the first and the second contract. The defence of the carrier does not bring enough objections to acquit Simpsons Ltd. He is therefore liable for the loss of the five containers of engine parts and the damage of 1,000 gallons paint. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    contract the terms of another contract between the parties, or a draft agreement between them23 - contract between one of them and a third party Brogden v MRC (1877) B supplied coal to MRC for many years without an agreement.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    The claimant bought the house but, after spending �100.000 on improvements to it, he discovered that aircraft noise was a problem. Hamilton Jones v David and Snape [2003] EWHC 3147. The claimant sought damages because the defendant's breach of contract had allowed her husband to abduct her sons to Tunisia.

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    The claimant offered to sell tools to the defendant. Their quotation included the details of their standard terms and conditions of sale. The defendant accepted the offer enclosing their own standard terms which was different from the claimant terms. The claimant acknowledged acceptance by returning a tear-off slip from the order form.

  2. "There are occasions where terms are implied into contracts which have never been discussed ...

    was not fit for the purpose that he had expressed which was a fast, flexible and easily managed car that would be comfortable and suitable for touring purposes. S14(3) can also apply in situations where the purpose is implied as in the case of Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd.

  1. "Everyone has the right to respect for their family life." Discuss this statement in ...

    In the convention the term family is specific for each individual case. For example there are no two families that are the same therefore a person's experience of a family life would be different to another person's experience. For this reason you do not have to be married to have the right to a family life.

  2. Common Law, 1st yr problem based assignment

    Jacky used, "he could come to buy...", and the wording is uncertain to make it an offer. A helpful case to this is Gibson v Manchester City Council3. The ratio of this case is certain terminologies have to be used to make an offer, and I think those refer to "will" or "am coming" etc.

  1. health and safety legislation and regulation

    If they find anything breaching the legislation and regulation they will fine the company or they will even close down the company for good. 2. The five steps of risk assessments and importance of carrying out the five steps. 1.

  2. Aspects of Contract and Business Law Case Studies

    Henry was the highest bidder in the case above, however Ben has refused to sell it to him at the price of £8100 because this is not Ben wanted. Ben has not reserved the auction therefore its Ben’s fault in this case.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work