• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the key ideas of the Cosmological argument for the creation of God?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The cosmological argument. a) What are the key ideas of the Cosmological argument for the creation of God? There are three key ideas in the cosmological argument each view is written by a different philosopher and has a different view of the reasons for existence. Lets have a look at the different views. Thomas Aquinas was one of the greatest theologians the world had ever seen. He believed that Aristotle's philosophy was a better foundation of Christianity than Plato's theories were. Aquinas believed that to prove gods existence people only had to look at the world around them, the world couldn't exist, as it is if there wasn't an ultimate force behind it all; this force is called god. Aquinas had three main ways of proving divine existence. The fist way is the argument from the fact of change to a prime mover; everything in the world is in motion and so had to have been moved by something, nothing can move by itself without something else exerting a force on it. There must have been something which exerted the force in the first moving thing and which wasn't moved by anything else. ...read more.

Middle

He argues that everything in the universe has an explanation for its existence. Everything must have a reason for being as it is. For example my phone is missing the 8 button because after I lost it I never stuck it back on. I didn't stick it back on because I don't have any glue, I don't have any glue because I don't have any in the house. This could go on forever but there must be an ultimate cause for everything, an underlying cause for everything's existence. This explanation is god. This must exist outside the universe itself otherwise the reason itself would be part of the cycle of reasons which needs explaining. The third argument is known as the Kalam argument as way put forward by two Muslim philosophers called al-Kindi and al-Ghazali. The argument has three steps to it. The first is that everything that exists has a cause; the second is that the universe began to exist; therefore the third is that the universe has a cause. This chain is a chain that cannot carry on forever. ...read more.

Conclusion

Does that not make us think that maybe we are necessary beings as too? The role of god in the cosmological argument can also be replaced with the big bang. Many theologians may say that god caused the big bang but before the big bang there was nothing, not even time. God could not have existed in a place where there is no time or space. There is more evidence for the big bang then there is for any of the cosmological argument. If the big bang had happened then there would still be radiation form it that would be detectable, Scientists called Penzias and Wilson detected this noise in 1965. They heard some background noise through their antennas and after a bit on investigation they found out that what they were hearing was actually cosmic background radiation from the big bang. With the big bang theory proved the cosmological theory would be blown out the window. Looking at these weaknesses I actually think that the weaknesses outweigh the strengths due to the evidence for each side. My main reason for this is the evidence for the big bang and the proof that scientists have for the event. If this event happened then none of the other cosmological arguments can be true. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Philosophy essays

  1. Describe the main strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument for the existence of ...

    the principle of sufficient reason, it would need a self-explaining necessary being, standing outside the series, to explain the order of the hierarchy.18 Deductively, that self-explaining necessary being would be that which humans understand to be God. Hence, the definition of "God" that Aquinas arrives at is this: The self-explaining

  2. Examine the strengths and weaknesses of - The Thomist Cosmological Argument of the Existence ...

    There are several weaknesses to the Cosmological Argument, suggested by different philosophers. Hume was the first to find a weakness in the argument. In Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, he asked why must we conclude that the universe has a beginning: "How can anything that exists from eternity have a cause,

  1. Outline the key ideas of the Teleological argument and identify at least two if ...

    to serve a purpose, for example trees and their intake of carbon dioxide. The natural world, according to the argument must then have an intelligent designer. The teleological argument was used by St Thomas Aquinas as one of his Five Ways of knowing that God exists, but the most cited statement of the argument is that of William Paley.

  2. Augustine on creation and Aquinas on the existence of God.

    So, one cannot measure something that has happened, because once it is in the past, it no longer exists. Augustine accepts that their appears to be an irrational aspect of presentism, in that by accepting the present as the only form of time, one would then seemingly have to agree

  1. Comapring Aristotle's Prime Mover and the Judeo-Christian God

    they do not do the right thing; this is shown in the Bible through the Parable of the Sheep and the Goats. Belief in God doesn?t allow humans to explore the world for themselves and is often contradicted by new important scientific discoveries e.g.

  2. Assess whether the cosmological argument proves the existence of God.

    is meaningless and absurd, if this is true then it would greatly undermine the argument. The most profound weakness is the ?Fallacy of composition?, which is the misconception of thinking that there is a property or predicate to each part of a given group, it must be logically follow that the whole group has the same properties or predicates.

  1. Outline the key ideas of the design argument.

    evident from their acting always in the same way so as to obtain the result.? Another example for Aquinas?s theory would be an archer and an arrow. Without the guidance from the archer, the arrow would not fly across the air.

  2. Examine the key ideas and strengths of the design argument for the existence of ...

    See order within the beauty i.e. the stars. Humans like to look at beautiful things. ?God made man in his own image? ? Genesis 1:27 Challenges against the Teleological arguments come from Scholar David Hume a scholar who argues that the universe is not orderly and harmonious e.g.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work