• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess Functionalist and Marxist approaches to the relationship between education and the economy

Extracts from this document...


G.D.H Assess Functionalist and Marxist approaches to the relationship between education and the economy Functionalist and Marxist perspectives differ considerably in the way they view the relationship between education and the economy. Both perspectives agree that the educational system provides society with certain functions, but they disagree about the purpose of these functions and more importantly who benefits from them. Functionalists see the educational system as providing a positive educational experience, which benefits the children and society. Whereas, Marxists claim that the system oppresses and harms people, and that it only benefits the powerful. Functionalists believe mass formal education is an essential part of industrial society, and that the expansion of industrial economies brings a corresponding expansion in the educational system. They also see the introduction of mass education in Britain during 1870, as a response to the increasing demand of industry, for a literate and numerate workforce. Many Functionalists, such as Durkheim, claim that education performs two central functions, which relate to social cohesion and the division of labour. Durkheim (1961 'Moral Education') argued that education transmits the norms and values of society to the next generation. It therefore reproduces social solidarity, which according to functionalism, is needed in order for society to exist. Durkheim offered an explanation of how social solidarity is reproduced by the educational system. He said that school creates a miniature model of society, where the child interacts and cooperates with other pupils whilst following a set of fixed rules. ...read more.


Post modernists have argued that in a fragmented and multi-cultural society, different groups have different values. Therefore, how can the educational system succeed in transmitting the values of society as a whole? Both Durkheim and Parsons have been criticised, particularly by Marxists, who have argued that the values of school and the purpose of job training, may not reflect the needs of society, but the interests of a ruling class. There have also been arguments about whether schools are meritocratic, some have suggested that the educational system largely reflects and transmits the inequalities of society. Davis and Moore's argument about role allocation has been criticised. Research has indicated that the relationship between academic qualifications and occupational status is weak. It has been argued that other factors, such as class, race and gender may play a bigger part in determining occupational status. It has also been suggested that even academic attainment itself, is affected by the pupils' class, race and gender. Some sociologists also believe that intelligence has little effect upon academic attainment. The Marxist approach to the relationship between education and the economy, places emphasis on the part the schools play in preparing children for their future working roles, in terms of both skills and values. Marxism sees the educational system as an ideological state apparatus, which is used by the ruling class to transmit their capitalist values, in order to protect their own interests. ...read more.


Richard Scase (1977 'Industrial Society: Class, Cleavage and Control') interviewed a sample of English workers, and found that only 2.5% of them felt that educational qualifications were an important factor in determining social class. The rest of the sample felt that family background and economic factors were more important. This would suggest that education has not succeeded in legitimating inequality. Reynolds criticised Bowles and Gintis for not adequately explaining how the economy shapes the educational system. He argued that it is impossible for the capitalist state to exercise complex control over schools, because local authorities and teachers have a considerable amount of freedom and independence in the way schools are organised. Bowles and Gintis's argument about the ruling class manipulating the educational system relies at the most basic level, on some sort of conspiracy between employers and teachers. To conclude, the Functionalist perspective views education as a vital part of society, which turns pupils into model citizens and has a positive impact on the economy and society as a whole. Education also produces a diverse workforce, in a way that is fair to everyone, and it compliments the requirements of the economy perfectly. The Marxist perspective views education as a part of society that is vital for the ruling class, because it reproduces the unequal distribution of wealth and power, by turning working class pupils into conformist workers. It therefore sees education as an ideological tool, used by the upper classes to exploit the working classes. Ref: Haralambos and Holburn (2000) Sociology: Themes and Perspectives (fifth edition) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically Evaluate the Functionalist Perspective on Education

    5 star(s)

    style of language used, attitudes and manners, which means initial privileges in school. These people are aware of the importance of education, and perhaps hold the feeling that privileged positions held by the minority in the top jobs must be protected.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Comparison Of Marxist And Functionalist Views On Education

    3 star(s)

    The role of Education in a Marxist world would be to reproduce the current class structure. Marxists believe that Education Forms the basis of all society and that this will always be true, because the education system copies what it sees in society, i.e.

  1. Examine sociological explanations of the relationship between education and the economy

    There is nothing wrong with these universities but certain people and groups see them as lower class and therefore less likely to employ them. This is a barrier that gets in the way. There is a lack of evidence that schools teach work specific skills, an example of this is

  2. Assess Functionalist and Marxist approaches to the relationship between education and economy.

    Hargreaves also noted that schools fail to produce a sense of dignity for working class pupils and therefore fail and may form subcultures, which rejects the values of the school. Hargreave proposed three solutions to the national curriculum. One was for students to follow a field of study where they have a special interest or ability.

  1. According to Marxist, the main aim of the education system is to provide capitalist ...

    The final and most important function of the hidden curriculum is that it produces a subservient workforce, fueled with passive and uncritical workers, who willingly and unquestioningly accept what functions they are told to perform. In a study of 237 members of a New York High School, Bowles and Gintis

  2. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist views on the role of education in ...

    A, where there educational curriculum has introduced the pupils to take an oath to the Stars and Stripes at the start of every school day, and so they are committed to their society at an early age. However a criticism to these norms and values that he talks about

  1. Identify and explain three ways in which, according to Marxism, the education system is ...

    This is replicated when a male worker is paid more and even respected more than a woman in a place of work. Even the basic things mirror the workplace; vocational and academic subjects mirror manual and non-manual work.

  2. The Marxist view of education

    Meritocracy is a myth. They state that the education system is a giant myth-making machine. It creates the myth that those at the top deserve their power and privilege, that they have achieved their status on merit, and that those at the bottom have only themselves to blame.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work