The chief objectives of this report include:Ø Settlement of the power conflict between top management of Cathay and pilots Ø Moderate the power of pilots in order to avoid or reduce industrial actions in future

Authors Avatar

TABLE OF CONTENT

1. INTRODUCTION        

1.1        Background Information        

2. OBJECTIVES        

2.1        Objectives        

2.2        Analysis of the Existing positions of both parties        

3. SOURCE OF INFORMATION        

3.1        Source of Information        

4. FINDINGS        

4.1        Interview Findings        

5.  SWOT ANALYSIS OF CATHAY        

5.1        SWOT Analysis        

5.1.1        Strengths        

5.1.2.        Weaknesses        

5.1.3.        Opportunities        

5.1.4.        Threats        

6. PROBLEM-SHOOTING AND RECOMMENTDATIONS        

6.1        Problems & Difficulties        

6.2        Recommendations and Strategies        

6.2.1  Strengthen the power of the company        

6.2.2. Weaken the power of the pilots        

7.        SUMMARY        

7.1        Summary        

8. REFERENCE & BIBIOGRAPHY        

8.1        REFERENCE        

8.2        BIBIOGRAPHY        


1. INTRODUCTION

  1. Background Information

Since 1993, Cathay Pacific Airways Limited (“Cathay”) has experienced the threat of industrial actions initiated by unions.  On 1 July 2001, another industrial action was commenced, resulted in a three-month chaos in Hong Kong's tourist industry.  

Being the representatives of the pilots of Cathay, Mr Nigel Demery, the President of Hong Kong Aircrew Officers’ Association (“HKAOA”), informed Cathay’s top management that the pilots refused to accept Cathay’s new pay proposal.  Members of the HKAOA have decided to commence industrial actions to force Cathay’s top management to accept their demand. The event was followed by a sharp increase of pilots reporting sick leaves.  Unlike previous industrial actions, Cathay’s top management held firm to their original standpoint and dismissed 52 pilots and chartered additional aircraft to moderate the problem of pilots reporting sick and absence from work.  However, the incident did not come to an end.  On the contrary, the problem escalated when HKAOA reacted by announcing support of the sacked pilots by taking legal actions against Cathay for the unfair dismissal.

The pilots’ industrial action caused a financial loss of US$12.8 million to Cathay each day. In fact, this was not the first time for the pilots to use industrial actions as a mean to press the top management in accepting their demands.  Three industrial actions have been taken place since 1999. These frequent industrial actions have not only caused financial loss, but also harmed the company’s overall reputation. Table 1 provides a summary of the industrial actions that has been taken place since 1993.

2. OBJECTIVES

2.1        Objectives

The chief objectives of this report include:

  • Settlement of the power conflict between top management of Cathay and pilots
  • Moderate the power of pilots in order to avoid or reduce industrial actions in future

2.2        Analysis of the Existing positions of both parties

Luthans (1992, p.426) said that formal organizations are highly political and power is the name of the game. Managers and non-managers in an organization often manipulate power to accomplish goals.  Cathay’s top management holds legitimate, reward and coercive power to perform various specific tasks and decisions.  Legitimating refers to an upward appeal, which adds weight to an influence attempt by showing support from senior managers, rules or procedures.  On the other hand, coercive power means the using of threats, intimidation and coercion to gain compliance. 

In the recent industrial action, the top management tried to utilize their legitimate and coercive power to gain pilots’ compliance. Apart from the effectiveness of this position-based power strategy, the use of coercive power always causes negative consequences such as weakening relationships.

In contrast, the pilots hold strong expert power. Pilots have high-value expertise. Referring to the strategic contingencies model which focused on individual power and how it is obtained, the subunits that are most central to the flow of work in an organization acquires power.  The major revenue of Cathay comes from passenger and cargo services. It is impossible for an aircraft to operate without a pilot.  The past industrial actions showed the strength of pilots’ expert power. Thus, the power conflict between top management and pilots must be settled in the long run.

Besides, Cathay’s pilots manipulated the coalition strategy to accomplish their goals. HKAOA is a typical coalition of pilots. At present, Cathay employs 1,500 pilots, more than 75% of the pilots are members of the HKAOA. Thus, each industrial action evoked by HKAOA has caused a significant impact on Cathay’s business and reputation.

Join now!

Given the fact that the majority of the general public was of the view that the pilots have been over-demanding and created much chaos to the tourist industry in Hong Kong (According to the interview results as well as from the media), it is a good opportunity for Cathay to take advantage of the situation and to moderate the power of the unions.


3. SOURCE OF INFORMATION

3.1        Source of Information

This report is based on both primary and secondary information from various means.  This includes:-

  • Interview with representatives of both Cathay and the HKAOA.
  • Annual ...

This is a preview of the whole essay