It is with the blind man that Lázaro becomes the rogue, as he draws out the pícaro in him through his cruelty and deceitful influence as he cheats people into paying him for prayers. When Lázaro has finally had enough of the miserly blind man he deliberately plays tricks on him as he ceases to care about pleasing his master, and leaves the blind man unconscious in the road after he tricks him into jumping into a stone pillar.
Lázaro comes across his second master in Maqueda where ‘El Clérigo’ asks if he is able to assist him during mass. Falling into his employment Lázaro comes across more misfortune ‘Escapé del trueno y di en el relámpago, porque era el ciego para con éste un Alejandro Magno, con ser la misma avaricia, como he contado.’ Lázaro is weakened by starvation with his new master as he is fed on one onion every four days, whereas his master feats himself daily upon food which he keeps locked in a chest. Lázaro comes to a point of desperation where he prays for deaths in his master’s congregation so that he may eat the funeral parlours, because they were the only place where he could get a good meal.
Weakened by starvation Lázaro is left questioning his morals and unable to leave his cruel master, due to his physically wakened state from starvation and the belief that each new master will be crueller than the last. Once again the rogue in him finds a way of cheating his master in order to survive. Lázaro the pícaro re-emerges as he comes across ‘un caldedero angelico’ knocking on his master’s door. By telling a lie he managed to acquire a key that fit the lock of the forbidden chest. Chaos ensues as the priest begins to count the loaves as he notices that they are going missing. By making his master believe that his precious bread is being nibbled at by rats by showing him a hole that is in the chest and leaving crumbs Lázaro manages to keep his master at bay. However as the priest tries every effort in keeping the rats away the situation becomes more complicated. The holes are patched up by his master, only to have Lázaro secretly tear in more holes with his knife. Unfortunately for Lázaro as his master becomes obsessed with the mystery of his diminishing food stores, he comes to believe that the culprit is a snake. One night hearing a whistling he makes his way to Lázaro’s bed in the night as he believes that the snake might be in his bed. Hitting Lázaro in the face the priest discovers the key hidden in Lázaro’s mouth. For his deception Lázaro suffers a serious wound and when he regains consciousness three days later he is sent away by the priest.
The tratado involving Lázaro and the priest is important as it provides the background against which the reader’s sympathy for the protagonist is intensified. The morals of the church are questioned with the lack of charity from the priest, compared to the desperation of Lázaro who once again has to deceive his master in order to survive.
‘El Escudero’ brings hope to Lázaro as he adopts him to be his servant. Although the squire appears to be well dressed and confident when Lázaro is brought into his house which is ‘oscura y lóbrega’ he realises that he is as poor as Lázaro himself despite appearances, and that his master will not be able to provide him anything, and he turns to despair. ‘Finalemente allí lloré mi trabajosa vida pasa y mi cercana vida muriente.’ The disappointment that Lázaro feels with the squire foreshadows his conscious abandonment of Lázaro at the end of the tratado. His relationship with this master is different as they act as allies rather than enemies in order to beat their hunger. Lázaro pities his master despite the squires* pride and stress on honour ‘la negra que llaman honra’ and begs for him, acting as the provider for the first time rather that the provided for. There is a mutual respect as neither the master nor the servant speaks of the reality of their situation as they live on the brink of starvation as they face constant hunger, symbols of death lie all about them as they live in ‘the house without food or drink.’ The roguishness of Lázaro is put to one side in this partnership as Lázaro does not have to cheat his master, and his master is not cruel. Lázaro begging for food cannot be seen as a dishonest act as he shares all that he finds. The intimacy in this tratado shows how Lázaro is becomes more humanised, only making his final betrayal more deep when his master abandons him as he is unable to pay the rent, leaving the boy waiting for him alone to face the debt collectors.
This tratado shows Lázaro at his highest moral point in the book, where he is willingly working in order to help his master ‘Contemplaba muchas veces mi desastre, que escapando de los amos ruines que había tenido, y buscando mejoría, viniese a topar con quien no solo mantuviese, mas a quien yo había de mantener.’ He could easily move onto another master but he stays as he wishes this master well. This tone from Lázaro makes his abandonment by the squire even more dramatic.
The fourth tratado is short as Lázaro chooses not to go into as much detail as he does with his previous master’s, he only stays with his master a ‘Fraile de la merced’ for the short period of eight days. As a reader we are denied access to Lázaro’s inner thoughts and feelings, as he merely complains about the amount of walking he had to do out doors, not much else is revealed. ‘Y por esto, y otras cosas cosillas que no digo, salí de él.’ Due to the lack of information and the reputation of Friar’s of that ilk during the 16th century (Cuando vieres a un fraile de la Merced / Arrima tu culo a la pared) it has been suggested that perhaps Lázaro was subject to sexual abuse by this master.
In this tratado the picaresque does not feature as there is no embellishment from Lázaro, and also the short length of time would allow for little to happen. From a technical point of view the passage acts as more of a passage of time as we see a more mature Lázaro with his following master.
Lázaro with his fifth master ‘El Buldero’ adopts a different role from that of the other tratados, as he becomes more of a spectator. Unlike the time spent with his other masters Lázaro is not starved or mistreated, so therefore his priorities change and Lázaro finds himself sympathising with the people that his master is deceiving. Lázaro witnessed how his master, who was commissioned to sell Papal bulls, would go to any lengths in order to convince the village people to buy themselves a ‘remission of sin.’ The role of the pícaro is therefore reversed in this tratado, as his master ‘El Buldero’ acts the rogue by performing fake miracles and exorcisms in order to sell his product. We see that Lázaro adopts a more of a moral attitude and leaves his master as he is being fed through dishonest means: ‘fue a la costa de los curas y otros clérigos donde iba a predicar.’ With time and experience we see that Lázaro is becoming less of a pícaro as he matures and moves from master to master.
Another transition of time passes as Lázaro took up the honest trade of a water seller in the sixth tratado. His master treated him well and paid him for his work, 30maravedis for every Saturday that he worked. At the end of four years Lázarillo saves himself enough money to dress himself well in honourable clothing. In doing so he leaves his trade ‘desde me vi en hábito de hombre de bien, dije a mi amo se tomase su asno.’ The irony is that Lázaro becomes like the poor squire, appearing to be a gentleman and having the same attitude that his looks bring him ‘honora.’ The values of Lázaro change once again as he becomes more inclined to materialistic things in order to bring him success.
With his new attire Lázaro falls into more work as the assistant to a constable, a wine cellar then the town crier of Toledo, living in the comfort of the petit bourgeois. It is here that the rogue re-emerges and we see perhaps the greatest element of the picaresque in the book. Lázaro conveniently falls into a marriage with a woman who is the mistress of the Archpriest of San Salvador. The constant need to have food on his plate is fulfilled as he is invited to dine with his wife’s master Sundays and most holidays as well as being gifts of food throughout the year. Despite the obvious infidelity of his wife Lázaro turns a blind eye and reaps the benefits of the ménage à trios, changing his role from being a comically deceived husband, to a pimp, as he encourages his wife to continue the relationship. He ignores the town gossip being told by the Archpriest that ‘quien ha mirar a dichos de malas lenguas nunca medrará’ therefore choosing the pathway to comfort and materialism at the expense of his and his wife’s honour.
The type of pícaro that Lázaro becomes in his adulthood is different to the one that he was when he was a child. In his childhood the cruelty and mistreatment of his masters brings Lázaro to perform deceitful acts of trickery in order to survive. His obsession with food lies in the fact that Lázaro is often on the brink of starvation, the fact that it is a matter of life and death for him makes Lázaro ‘the boy’s’ acts more justifiable. By the seventh tratado however the justification is lost. Lázaro has moved himself up through his working with various masters and from the lessons he has learnt, therefore making him capable to work for his living. By allowing the situation with his wife and the Archpriest Lázaro’s morals are questioned and the readers sympathy wanes as we realise that Lázaro is a pícaro for his own comfort. His marriage situation makes his life more luxurious and easy.
The novel and its picaresque elements are not solely confined to the character of Lazarillo de Tormes. His masters in someway or another were all pícaro’s themselves. The blind man sold prayers to women charging them and giving them false hope in exchange for food. The priest act extremely uncharitably and starves Lázaro whilst he is a glutton himself. The squire is a pícaro in the sense that he deceives people into thinking that he is a man of honour from the way he dresses, whereas in reality he is penniless and starving, finally performing the ultimate act of betrayal and abandoning Lázaro leaving him to face people he owes money to. The Pardoner who sells remissions of sins is probably the worst pícaro of them all as he deceives larges groups of people into thinking that they have a definite place in heaven. Finally the Archpriest is a rogue for convincing Lázaro to marry his mistress, whilst keeping his good name unblemished.
The element of the picaresque is ongoing throughout the book. Despite Lázaro being the main pícaro of the book initially is it not from his choosing. He is pushed into becoming a rogue from the cruelty of his masters, which then in later life lowers his morals as he become similar to his masters himself, greedy and selfish. Lázaro’s life turns a circle as he becomes like his mother marring himself to the hand that feeds him. By the end of the book Lázaro is a rogue by choice and admission, unlike during his childhood where becoming a rogue was a matter of survival.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Anon, La Vida de Lázarillo de Tormes. Edited by R.O.Jones 1963
Helen H. Reed, The Reader in the picaresque novel, 1984
Fransisco Rico, La novella picaresca y el punto de vista.1970
Harry Sieber, The Picaresque 1977
Wilkipedia online Encyclopedia.
JSTOR online journals.