In what ways does the character of Macbeth change between Act I and Act III in the play Macbeth?

Authors Avatar

Joanna Richman 10Q2

In what ways does the character of Macbeth

change between Act I and Act III in the play Macbeth?

In this piece of coursework, I will be arguing the points for and against the change of the character Macbeth in the play ‘Macbeth’. The play ‘Macbeth’ written by William Shakespeare and set in the 1080s, argues facts such as the strength of women in society and the main monarchy issues. Superstition and fate are another two things which the play argues throughout, as Macbeth always has a female influence with him, telling him what to think and how to act, in a sense that he is controlled by women throughout.

           As the story of Macbeth unfolds, Macbeth goes from being an honourable servant of King Duncan (soon to be killed by Macbeth), to a King who is determined to overcome fate and female influences. A character who suffers from his greed, dies at the hands of Macduff at the end.

           At the time when James I came onto the thrown, witchcraft was a huge part in society. The witchcraft act of 1562 stated that ‘any persons who should use or practise witchcraft will be executed’. People at the time of the Elizabethan era blamed unexplainable events as the work of witches, as the supernatural had always played a huge part in society. Women at the time of James I were often been accused of being witches, and most of the time were expected to be housewives. Though women were seen to be more educated than men, and were able to sort out problems more logically than men. This could show that women were mentally stronger than men, but it was seen to be regarded that women were the weaker sex, both mentally and physically. Old, poor, unprotected and single women/widows were the ones who were mainly targeted for witchcraft allegations.

          Macbeth was set in the 1080s, though it was written around 500 years later by William Shakespeare. The play Macbeth is known as ‘the Scottish play’ by some people, as it was seen that you couldn’t use the word ‘Macbeth’ (unless you were an actor) because of supernatural or irregular acts. Tragedies are thoughts to portray people; not to offend God, but still teaches people moral values. Tragedies originated in Greece, as Greek inhabitants are very conscious of the supernatural and supernatural acts. In Greek tragedies, all actors were male and always wore masks. Any violence in these plays would of taken place off stage, as the theatres were seen to be a holy place. This would show that killing them off stage would just be like killing them in the real world. Performances were open to all citizens, including women, but there is now little evidence to prove this. Macbeth was written at the time of Queen Elizabeth I’s death, and the throne was taken over by James I, so this could show that a male monarch may be stronger than a female monarch, and that a male monarch is what our country needs.

Join now!

           At the start of Act I, Macbeth is seen as a hero and extremely brave, but towards the end of Act III, his whole personality changes and begins to show the different side of Macbeth. ‘We’ve scotched the snake, but not killed it’ shows that although they have injured Banquo, he will heal over time and will come fighting back, causing more problems for Macbeth to deal with. Could this be the reason why Macbeth hired two murderers to kill Banquo, so he would have no reason to be guilty of anything? After the killing ...

This is a preview of the whole essay