The Crucible as a piece of drama is structurally flawed. It reaches a climax is the trial scene and subsequently loses momentum. Discuss.

Authors Avatar

““The Crucible” as a piece of drama is structurally flawed. It reaches a climax is the trial scene and subsequently loses momentum. Discuss.”

In terms of events, Act 3 is the most dramatic scene of “The Crucible.” This is because in Act 3, the play’s events spiral out of control, as the hysteria and momentum increase, so does the climax. Whereas, in Act 4, it is four months later and so it loses momentum as such a large space of time has elapsed. Also in this scene, the false confession that John Proctor makes isn’t as dramatic as the honest confession of adultery in the previous act. This is because the adultery confession is a personal secret of John’s, whereas the confession about binding himself to the Devil’s service is a lie and he only confesses it to save his life. Also in Act 4, the play loses some of its major characters but we only hear of them going, we don’t see it happening; therefore, that dramatic moment is absent from the play. There is some drama in Act 4 but it is a personal drama between John and Elizabeth and not an exciting drama that will entice the audience.

The amount of injustice in Act 3 is crucial to the play. Although there are some examples of injustice in Act 4, they’re not as dramatic as the injustices in Act 3. The start of the injustices in Act 3 begins with Martha Corey’s trial in the court. We hear Martha saying: “I know not what a witch is” and for that reason she should be released. However, the judges continue to interrogate Martha until Giles’ outburst, he claims that he has “evidence for the court.” Instead of listening to him, Danforth cries out: “Arrest him, Excellency.” This could suggest to us that, even though the court knows the truth, they do not want to hear it. If they did they would be admitting that they were wrong to hang people for witchcraft and so it will spoil the credibility of further court trials.

The next form of injustice in Act 3 is when Mary Warren confesses to lying about being possessed by someone else’s spirit. In response, the girls, led by Abigail, lie about the wind, saying: “Mary, do you send this shadow on me?” Thus suggesting Mary has bewitched them with her spirit and it has been sent out to kill them. In the midst of this act of lying, Abigail cries out: “Oh, Heavenly Father,” which then brings out the rage in Proctor and leads him to confess to adultery. This is a catalyst for the next injustice: Elizabeth’s lie. Elizabeth, usually an honest woman, “In her life sir she have never lied,” lies to stay faithful and to protect her husband. Unfortunately, the first lie she tells in her life is the lie that eventually kills her husband.

The historical context of this play shows us the social injustices of the Salem witch trials but it is also a reflection of the social injustices at the time of McCarthyism. In this play the character of John Proctor symbolically represents Arthur Miller. We find this out in Act 4 when John Proctor is asked to implicate his fellow townspeople, just as Arthur Miller was when he was called upon by an American organisation. They had reason to believe he was a secret communist.  They then asked Miller to name others who had attended communist meetings with him, and just like John Proctor, he refused to do so.

Join now!

The legal system begins to crumble in Act 4. The courts relied on Abigail’s judgement in the witch trials but we hear Parris say: “my niece - I believe she has vanished” and “My daughter tells me how she heard them speaking of ships.” These quotes give us reason to believe Abigail has absconded because she has a guilty conscience and knows that she has let innocent people die because of her vindictive, evil manner. Also, Hale’s manner, as a religious teacher who has knowledge in how to seek out witchcraft, changes dramatically at the end of Act 3 and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay