Whose Life Is It Anyway?

Authors Avatar

Whose Life Is It Anyway?

We are all entitled to dignity, we should all be able to distinguish what is right and wrong for ourselves, but what if your freedom of speech was taken away?

Until we reach the age of eighteen we live our lives under the supremacy of our parents, this is for our better being. Once we have reached adulthood we are expected to make our own judgements, we should be able make rational decisions for ourselves. Teenagers eagerly work towards this goal of freedom with little thought for how they will always be under authority, whether it be in the workplace, the community, or in everyday life. But these rules which we unconsciously live under are supposedly for our own benefit.


Brian Clark wrote “Whose Life Is It Anyway?” in 1972. Ken Harrison is a artistic and intellectual man, a sculptor by profession. Until he is involved in an unfortunate accident which leaves him paralyzed from the neck down.
His witty, vibrant mind is left trapped, in a useless shell of a body. Throughout the book we sadly witness a man of great intrepidity have his independence stolen, along with his dignity.

The books vast majority is set in Ken’s hospital room where he waits indefinitely. Kens only contact with the world outside, ironically, are the doctors and nurses, which have become the reason for his confinement. Clark cleverly uses the unvaried setting to give you a clear insight into the monotonous non-existence of Ken’s life.

Quadriplegia encages Ken’s body within four square walls.  But his mind remains acute, as he apprehends the struggle that lies ahead of him. Kens voice protests on the behalf of all the patients who’s dignity, and self-determination is overruled by well-intention and expert opinion.

Join now!

        

Dr. Emerson poses as his main opposition, he is a doctor with much experience, and he is unquestionably loyal to his profession. The conflict between patient and doctor becomes a delicate contrast between ethics and politics.

Dignity begins with choice, Kens choice to die only becomes inhumane once he is refused it, society would find a mans existence declined equally unethical.

Ken is aware of the limitations on his improvement, that he will be spending the rest of his life dependant on others, nothing more than an active brain in a non-functional body. As a man ...

This is a preview of the whole essay