Forensic science and detection techniques were improved within the force as well: In the early nineteenth century the cutting edge of detection policy was foot printing and its value in locating the criminal. But still the standard process in detective work remained to be ‘following suspicious characters’, the same methods used by ‘bobbies’ on the street. In 1884 a murderer was convicted because of the torn paper used for his pistol wadding matched the minute pieces that were found in his victims wound from the firearm. In 1892 a man called Alphonse Bertillon gave his name to a new method of identification which involved measuring specific parts of a humans body on the basis that no two individuals would be the same. This was soon made obsolete by the significant invention of fingerprinting in 1901, which was founded on a similar sort of assumption as the ‘Bertillon’ technique. Another revised form of police detection was photography; although a ‘Rogues Gallery’ of criminal photographs had existed in Scotland Yard since 1862 the first Force photographer was appointed in 1901. This method was originally used because it was thought possible to distinguish criminal ‘types’ from the shape of their skull and facial features. Photography was useful also in the examination of crime scenes and evidence…
Summarily, we can now see that although law and order in London in the nineteenth century was improved and regulated by the Metropolitan Police Force it had its failures as well. For instance while there were far fewer street crimes in the second half of the nineteenth century with the introduction of the MPF, but the number of burglaries actually went up. But not one of the massive amounts of modernisations and improvements within the MPF could stop a killer named ‘Jack the Ripper’ the evasive prostitute-slasher who held the East of London in his grip of terror spanning nearly a whole year, who has still never been caught…
- Why did the Whitechapel murders attract so much attention in 1888?
Between the years 1888 and 1891 eleven murders took place in an area named Whitechapel, London. At some point in the last 114 years all of these murders have been branded as ‘Ripper’ killings (See following table for a list of the murders and the six, in bold, now conceded as Ripper victims.) Jack the Ripper is the most notorious of Victorian criminals, yet he only, allegedly, killed six people who were considered to be of little importance in relation to Victorian society. So why did London, England and a number of other nations become so shocked and absorbed by this one man? Why do we still toil and endlessly investigate over this case of homicides? I hope to be able to answer this question during and at the end of this essay.
The Whitechapel Murders and the incorporated Ripper Murders (Marked in bold):
Note: Emma Elizabeth Smith and Amelia Farmer were not killed. Smith was attacked by a gang of five men who raped her and ‘inserted a blunt object into her vagina’ causing a substantial rip in her perineum. She succumbed to a coma after describing her attack and died four days later. Farmer (probably the same Amelia Farmer who last saw Chapman alive) faked a Ripper attack and partially slit her own throat in order to commit robbery.
A simple answer to this question could be that people had never seen this sort of crime before, neither sex-related nor serial, but both statements would be untrue. History has seen plenty of serial killing sex-offenders and although the common person may not be aware of them sexual murders are no modern thing. Sex related child murders could be accounted to Gilles de Rais, Marshal of France, in the 13th Century. Countess Bathory of 16th Century Hungary caused the death of some 650 girls so as to bathe in their blood and even in 1880 in Paris a man named Louis Menesclou lured a four year old girl into his room, strangled and then slept with her. The truth is however that the Ripper killings revolutionised the age of sex crime, they were the first cases of sex crime in the sense that we understand it today. The brutal and increasing ferocity in the nature of the crimes seemed designed to shock London. The Ripper murders, with their nightmarish mutilations, simply went beyond normal comprehension. This sparked a sort of morbid and black curiosity within people, ensuring their instant absorption into the story of the Ripper killings.
It seemed that the Ripper had no motive for such crimes, except from perhaps harbouring a deep sexual-psychological rage towards women. The killings were certainly not economic, the women were prostitutes and rarely carried amounts of money greater than that of which could buy a large glass of gin. Another stricken motive is sexual desire, even the most attractive of the victims, Mary Jane Kelly, was described as ‘a massive Irish woman who looked as if she could knock down a horse with an uppercut.’ The abdominal wounds and ferocity of the killings suggest what some people call ‘sexual hunger’ not like the aforementioned sexual desire but a force that had gone past desire and forced the individual to achieve sexual fulfilment in more radical ways. An example of this is Sylvestre Matushka who wrecked trains in order to reach sexual climax. These seemingly random, motiveless and psychological aspects of the murder methods attracted more attention from people.
One of the main factors of interest within the Ripper case was the unresolved matter of his identity, this particular aspect amassed quite a following due to the possible theories that the killer could perhaps posses medical knowledge, making him a high class, maybe prominent within London’s society. The continuing question of the Rippers existence and his blatant mockery shown in his apparent letters to people were intriguing, it appeared that this evasive monster was above the law, laughing and ridiculing even as he told authorities where he lived. (Prince William Street, this was derived from one of the many letters allegedly sent from the Ripper, although few researchers give it much credence. Prince William Street was only yards from the main road between Aigburth and the office of the Cotton Exchange.)
The correspondence received that related to the Ripper case (almost all claming to be Jack the Ripper) was massive, and only three are now considered credible, the ‘Dear Boss’ letter, the ‘Saucy Jacky’ postcard and the ‘From Hell’ letter. These, if real, all gain the reader a disturbing if valuable insight into the Rippers mind, suggesting a psychotic notion and displaying how he derived pleasure from his killings. These details served only to spark more interest in the case of this serial killer. The press reacted to the Ripper with great shock, and any news on it was widely covered. This emphasises just how much of an impact the killings made on people’s lives; normally a murder in Whitechapel would receive no such coverage at all and would often go un-noticed by the press, but the sheer ferocity of the Ripper murders instantly caught their attention and after the Nichols murder coverage was widespread.
- Why were the police unable to catch Jack the Ripper?
In the following essay I will attempt to portray an alternative answer to the above question. If the Whitechapel Murders table (above) is observed it can be seen that the Ripper murders followed a curious pattern of occurrence:
7th August
31st August
8th September
30th September
30th September
9th November
These dates could be interpreted so as think that the murders occurred on every 7/8th of the month and every 30th/31st of the month. Interestingly these dates also coincide with the phases of the moon which existed in 1888, the first and last murders, Tabram and Kelly, were both committed on the exact full and half moon phases of their month. The four remaining murders were all carried out two days before a moon phase. It is said that by offering blood sacrifices coinciding with moon phases that an inverted occult pentagram can be constructed (Five being a very significant figure in the occult). This ritual, once completed gives the individual, among other things, ‘favour in the sight of the Old Ones when They once more walk the Earth’ and a cloak of invisibility or immunity from discovery. But it could be raised that there were six victims, Martha Tabram was the first (incidentally her death again has an occult significance; she was stabbed thirty-nine times, three times thirteen apparently being an occult formula, perhaps part of the aforesaid ritual). On the 30th of September there were two murders, Stride and Eddowes, Stride however was not a proper victim. It is evident from the inquest at the time and the subsequent events that the Ripper was disturbed in his mutilation of Stride and did not have time to complete his ritual slaying. Perhaps it was essential enough that he had to find a second victim quickly in order to have a sacrifice for that particular moon phase, this was to be Eddowes.
If this theory is to function how can the lack of killings in October be explained? It is known that Inspector Abberline traced and questioned three medical students at the beginning of October about the murders, perhaps one of those students was in fact the Ripper. It would explain why there were no killings that month and that the Ripper waited until he could be sure he was no longer under suspicion. Only through pure speculation can that particular conclusion be derived, yet it is very tempting. Could this pent-up frenzy also explain the horror of the Miller’s Court murder? The final death that would seal the pentagram ritual and bring the killings to an end.
So perhaps the reason for the MPF’s inability to detain the killer and his continued anonymity is that he is, in fact, impossible to trace, protected by a dark force that mirrors the nature of his dark murders.
Assignment Two: Source Questions
1. Study source A.
What can you learn from Source A about the murder of Martha Tabram and Polly Nicholls?
Source A suggests a number of things relating to the murderer. It infers to the possibility that the killer was insane, “work of a demented being”, although there is, in fact, no evidence to support this inference other than the “extraordinary violence” used. We can see from the source that there is no apparent motive to the killings, it informs us with: “no adequate motive in the shape of plunder can be traced.” This seemingly complete lack of understanding about the motive of the murders suggests that this was indeed one of the first publicised or heavily investigated cases of serial sex crime in the available history.
- Study sources A, B and C.
Does the evidence of Source C support the evidence of Sources A and B about the Ripper murders?
Source C can provide only one obvious assent to the statements in Source B, Blackwell’s report on Stride’s body states at the end: “In the neck there was a long incision which commenced on the left side, two and a half inches below the angle of the jaw, cutting the windpipe completely in two.” This conforms with Source B’s cogitation that it was an anatomically skilled and knowledgeable person, any less experienced person (As was confirmed by police inquiries with slaughterers and surgeons, etc.) would have hesitated and made at least two incisions. Yet both Source B and Source C seem to disagree with Source A, the newspaper article. This could be attributed to the early status of the article; both the other sources are from later murders and more information may have been gathered, it is also because Source A is only a newspaper article, the other two sources are in-depth reports. A newspaper is not required to delve into detail and is not obliged to be constantly accurate. Source A claims that the murders are the work of a madman where as Source B states firmly how the murderer must have had considerable skill and knowledge, these are not traits normally associated with people inflicted with insanity. Source A also declares that there is no financial motive for the murders where as Source C clearly says that there was no money on the body, this could be because the murderer removed any, again dissent to Source A’s statements.
3. Study Sources D and E.
How useful are Sources D and E in helping you to understand why the Ripper was able to avoid capture?
Source D presents us with an eyewitness description of the supposed killer from Elizabeth Long, believed to be the last person to see Annie Chapman alive. This information, when analysed, can help us comprehend better the reasons for the Rippers sustained anonymity. Long’s portrait of the killer, while quite concise given the circumstances, is by no means grounds enough to locate the murderer. There are no characteristics featured in the report that could help to tell the Ripper apart from any other Victorian man in a London street. The fact that Long mentions he had a foreign appearance could have attributed to the futility of the search for the Ripper. Racism was very common in Victorian London (specifically anti-Semitism) and it would not be surprising to find that Long had perhaps included that part of the report just to stir trouble. The Metropolitan Police Force, of course, launched massive inquiries and utilised a lot of police resources in order to follow up and investigate these claims of the Ripper’s nationality. This source is also an example of the many vague portrayals of the Ripper’s appearance:
“I think he was wearing a dark coat but I cannot be sure.”
This uncertainty in nearly all eyewitnesses and the night-time nature of the crimes would only serve to hinder the MPF in their efforts to find the killer. Source E is an article published in a London newspaper after the deaths of Annie Chapman and Polly Nicholls. In this article the MPF, it seems, are being criticised for their poor handling of the situation. Not only does this help us understand why the Ripper was able to avoid capture but the article also goes on to describe Whitechapel at the time as “a network of narrow, dark and crooked lanes.” This in itself is another aid to the Ripper’s evasion, for someone who knew the area it would be more than easy to disappear after a murder or escape from pursuers.
It would appear from these two sources that the Police focused their forces in the wrong areas and the wrong ways, from this prospective the sources are extremely useful in helping us to understand the Ripper’s escape from identification.
- Study Sources F and G.
Use Sources F and G, and your own knowledge, to explain how the police tried to catch Jack the Ripper.
Source F demonstrates one of the MPF’s approaches in locating Jack the Ripper. It is a leaflet requesting any information about the murders. This conveys the MPF’s desperation as they couldn’t have hoped to get much of a response from the leaflets, especially since they were distributed after the fifth murder, by then all of England would have known of Jack the Ripper and anyone with information useful to the police would surely have come forward before. Source G is an extract from a letter sent to the Home Secretary on the 17th of September (after the third murder) requesting the reinstatement of rewards for information leading to a felon’s arrest. In addition to these, and many other methods, the MPF employed watchmen to hide in dark alleys or patrol around Whitechapel, every potential source was followed through, experts from all fields were brought in and people of many professions questioned, especially regarding skills or techniques used in any sort of slaughtering, incision making or surgery. Since the MPF did not have the technology to vary their detection techniques they relied on a labour intensive guarding of the Whitechapel area, and consequently also depended on catching the Ripper at the scene of the crime with evidence at hand.