• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent were Stalins economic policies successful?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent were Stalin's economic policies successful? After Lenin's death in January 1924 there was a struggle for power within the Bolshevik party as Lenin did not specify a new leader. This left a lot of people wanting to become leader but after a struggle Stalin became undisputed ruler in 1928. Soon after this he introduced his economic policies but in order to determine how successful these policies were we have to take in to account the reasons Stalin embarked on his economic policies, the targets of the policies, what he did to achieve his objectives, the successes of the policies, the failures of the policies and the human cost of the policies. Stalin separated his policies into two which were industrialisation and collectivisation. The reasons Stalin chose to industrialise is that Russia was scared of the west. Stalin was afraid of been attacked by the capitalist west so set about making an industry so if war came Russia could produce arms fast and effectively. Stalin believed that this Western attack could happen very soon so speed was very important. Russia needed to be Self-sufficient also; this meant that it would be less dependant on other countries. Stalin aimed to catch up the 50-100 years Russia was behind everyone else in 5-10 years. ...read more.


There were two five year plans which were completed and also a third which had to be stopped. The 5 Year Plans basically set targets and helped people to realise what they were aiming for. In the countryside in order for Collectivisation to take place the State took direct control of agriculture and collectivised it. This meant that the peasants would put their lands together to form larger joint farms but they could also keep small plots for personal use. Animals and tools were also pooled together and the farms would be run by committees. Also the MTS (Motor Tractor Service) were provided by the communists to make tractors available and make farming easier. The Kolkhoz (collectivised farms) would produce 90% of their crop for the state who would then share out the profits and 10% to feed the peasants. Many peasants refused to collectives so party officials were sent out to the countryside that was called the 25,000ers (this was because there were 25,000 sent out) and forced those peasants who refused to collectivise. The officials were helped by the red army and the secret police. The main group of peasants to rebel were the Kulaks, the more prosperous peasants, and they simply refused to hand over anything and refused to becoming workers of the state so 'De-Kulakerisation' took place. ...read more.


Consumer goods were scarce and of poor quality. The working conditions on the large construction projects were appalling with many deaths and accidents. The workers were always working in dangerous conditions. Wages were also an issue. Wages fell between 1928 to 1937. Food was extremely basic also with just grain and crop being supplied. Strict discipline was also introduced in the factories which in most cases meant not many breaks and a lot of work. In the countryside over 13 million peasants died from famine, a lot of which came from the Ukraine. Also the almost all of the Kulaks were killed or sent off to labour camps where they were tortured and made to work for many hours on end. Many of the rebellious peasants were tortured or killed also. In conclusion I would say that Stalin's economic policies were a success. They achieved their main aim which was to win the next war which they did against Germany in World War 2. Stalin created a super power out a laughing stock in 10 years. But with some many people dying it is hard to call the whole thing a success. I would call Collectivisation a success and a failure as Russia managed to produce more grain than before but 13 million people died from a man made famine which is a terrible amount. Industrialisation I would call a success as Russia was now an industrial super power and it involved far less deaths than Collectivisation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. How was the schlieffen plan meant to work

    Additionally the use of cannons was constrained because they were difficult to handle and maneuver to accurately reach the enemy's trench. Therefore the weaponry used in the war contributed to the development of the stalemate quite greatly because, firstly, when using the machine guns and rifles the shooters found t

  2. To what extent is Al Queda a terrorist organisation?

    Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are examples of these states. Bin Laden did not believe that the Saudi Government acted in accordance to the Islamic law when they willingly allowed thousand of Americans upon their soil. There are many factors that link Al-Qaeda to Islam, but one that does not is the Crusades, which took place in the Middle Ages.

  1. Stoke Bruerne: Canal lives

    Comparing this to the evidence in the museum, the museum by far had lots more information on Sister Mary Ward. To the left is a photograph which I had taken on the visit to Stoke Bruerne. As you can see there is a lot more information on Sister Mary Ward than in the source.

  2. Evacuation was a success

    Female 1.8 62 19.1 31 9 14 7 Female 1.5 45 20.0 44 9 14 5 Female 1.49 52 23.4 56 9 14 10 Female 1.75 65 21.2 Student Number Year Group Years Months Gender Height (m) Weight (kg) Body Mass Index (BMI)

  1. To what extent was the Irish Famine merely an excuse for Peel to repeal ...

    Throughout his ministry, Peel expressed increased interest in Irish affairs, with acts such as the Maynooth grant in his political history. The idea that he had always been working on Irish policies makes it plausible that he repealed the Corn Laws for the benefit of the Irish.

  2. Do you think Lumsdale was a successful choice for the site of these mills?

    close to Cromford and there was no need to transport any goods long distances up steep hills by packhorse. The Cromford canal was built in 1794 and Cromford's mills could benefit enormously from this because it was a cheap way to transport goods and no expensive methods such as packhorses would be necessary at all.

  1. The Great Famine

    The collapse of a largely home-based textile industry, due to the advent of a factory based textile industry, exacerbated the situation in some rural areas, particularly in north Connacht and south Ulster. In Kerry and Cork, small holdings, which had been rented as part industrial, were now reduced to depending exclusively on farming.

  2. Was Cardinal Wolsey(TM)s Domestic Policies Successful?

    He put forward the humanist principles that all crimes should be punished regardless of rank or wealth. This made him popular with the peasants who were allowed to put in complaints about people. A good example of Wolsey abusing his power was with the case against Henry Standish.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work