Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power in the UK and US

Authors Avatar

Tanvi Thanki

0255878

GV1200

Compare and contrast pluralist and ruling elite accounts of political power

In the UK and US

‘Power is an inherently unequal relationship comprising an attempt to by one person or group to secure compliance from or enforce dependence upon another person or group’ (Stephen Lukes). In a pluralist political system, it is impossible for any one group to dominate all of government. Government is responsive to a plurality of groups which represent a plurality of interests and control diverse political resources. ‘Among the constant fats to be found in all political systems, one is so obvious that it is apparent to the most casual eye: in all societies two classes of people appear-a class that rules and a class that is ruled (Mosca). In this essay I will look at the similarities and differences of pluralism and the ruling elite in both the UK and in the US. Pluralism being that not one single group can be in power and the ruling elite theory states that there is only one group in power, which also shares a common set of interests.

Join now!

Pluralism is a political system in which pressure groups and other organisations seek to control government policy through the process of lobbying. These lobbies can become terrifically powerful. Pluralists claim that their system makes government more democratic by keeping representative politicians in check between elections. They argue that an election is to blunt an instrument for a democracy as a voter must chose between two parties neither of which supports a policy that he might think very important. An individual can then use the lobbying system to bring attention to that issue. They maintain that all these lobbies will ...

This is a preview of the whole essay