Euthanasia Essay

Introduction

In this essay I am going to try and find out whether Euthanasia is right or wrong, and if it should be legalised or not. I will go about this by looking at all aspects of the argument, I will look at real life stories, the emotional, religious, ethical, laws, medical and the financial aspects of the argument. Then at the end of the essay I will give my own opinion.

 Euthanasia, is the practice of ending a person’s life to release someone from an incurable illness or if the person is in intolerable pain. This can only be done if it is the persons will (if they are over the age of 18,) or if the person has a living will, which was written before they became ill, or are in coma. But even then, Doctors go against the will of the person and do what they believe to be right. If the person is under the age of 18 then the doctors decide how they should treat them, and if they are in a coma there is no chance of them surviving, then the parents or guardians of the person can decide if they want them to stay alive or to switch the machines off. There are different types of Euthanasia, two of these types are Passive Euthanasia, which is when nothing is done to prevent death e.g. when Doctors don’t use an artificial respirator to keep alive someone terminally ill. Another type of Euthanasia is Active Euthanasia which is painlessly putting someone to death.  

Living will is when a person writes what they wish to happen to them if they were in a certain position, e.g. if the person was involved in an accident and became severely brain damaged and they had written that they would like to be allowed to die rather than to be treated, then they should be allowed to die. Although Doctors do not always do as they were asked to in the living will and go against the person’s wishes.  

 

Against Euthanasia

When a person dies there are many people, like relatives and friends that will be affected. It would be very upsetting for the relatives and friends of a person who was helped to die, because they may not know the reasons for the person wanting to die, and they may feel that they could have been treated or helped. Also if the person was in a coma and being kept alive by life-support machines, there always a chance that the person may begin to show signs of improvement at any time, ‘miracles can happen’. This was proven true ‘when a day before Catherine Roberts’s life machine was going to be removed, she blinked, stuck her tongue out and mouthed ‘I love you’ at her mother.’ So some people feel that there is always a chance for the person to recover. When a person has a serious illness (not in a coma and are perfectly sane,) and it is almost one hundred percent certain they will not to recover they may be depressed and not actually mean what they say. This could mean that a relative or friend could not understand or know that the ill person is depressed and help them to die with out realising they are depressed. Another emotional aspect of this argument, which is probably very rare, is that a friend or relative of the ill person may know that they are wealthy (especially if they are old, and if they know that the money would get passed on to them,) and pressurise or persuade and take advantage of the ill person that it would be for the best and a lot less painful if they were to die quickly. If Euthanasia stayed illegal it would be protecting elderly people from undue pressure.

Join now!

Ethically, it could be wrong to take any decisions about another persons’ life and it may be seen as murder of a kind to help someone take a life even if it is what the person wants. People arguing against Euthanasia say that permitting health service professionals to engage in active Euthanasia creates risks of abuse and misuse of the power over life and death.

Many Christians believe that Euthanasia is wrong; they think this because they believe that everyone is meant to die at a certain time, not when they decide. Today most branches of Christianity, Judaism, and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay